~ TOC Editorial ~

April 2012 will forever be remembered as arguably the most significant milestone month in Singapore's online media landscape.

No, it has nothing to do with TOC's indulgence with its April Fool's joke, much as we wish our sense of humour is that well liked. It also has nothing to do with what would likely be the first physical gathering of bloggers to boo down the proposed Internet code of conduct, courtesy of the Institute of Policy Studies.

Indeed, the milestone comes from our political elite, infamous for its many blunders and politically-suicidal antics online.

This April, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong made waves online when he launched his Facebook page and attracted more than 40,000 fans within days.

By this count, it would seem that the PM himself has not only checked the box, but now sets the gold standard for one of his promises following General Elections 2011 – to engage more online.

But one wonders if he is engaging the online community, or merely engaging online. Has he fully exploited a highly interactive platform, or is he (or the Prime Minister's Office) still using it as an information/ ideology dissemination tool?

It is clear that PM is receiving a mass influx of comments on various issues. Nobody is expecting the PMO to handle all of them, so he was right in making a clarification post to say he has forwarded these citizen concerns to his Ministers – a positive step forward, as it (minimally and finally) acknowledges that online comments can be valid.

But one critical aspect of online engagement is transparency – at least in terms of the willingness to close the feedback loop. Not all of his Ministers are as willing to engage online. What have they done with these comments, and does having PM as mediator help facilitate the resolution of these issues?

If you have been one of those whose views have been flagged for attention to a Minister by PM Lee, we will like to hear from you about your experience. Let us know what has happened since, by adding your comments to this page.

Regardless, this move at the highest level of political leadership will be seen as a positive start for the online presence of the People's Action Party. But governance is not just about putting you photo online and letting it make friends with other photos.

Governance is about working the ground of your constituency to understand citizen issues, raising citizen concerns in parliament, and translating these concerns into policy formulation. Always in that order, but not always involving all components, which then depends on whether you are a Member of Parliament or a Minister.

So, as part of our "GE2011 One Year On" series, we would like to hear from you about how you think your elected representative has performed. But lets do it with a twist: Visit our Facebook discussion page, and submit an award nomination!

Most Cyber-Engaged Minister. Best Spectator in Parliament MP. Most Well-Walked for Walkabouts MP. Lifetime Achiever for Talking Down Singaporeans Minister. Whatever your peeve, whatever your pick, from the serious to the wackier, from any political party you care for, we want your submissions. Add a description to justify your choice, and we might just put it into our honour roll at the end of the week!

But we will not just let you do the thinking. On 7 May 2012, TOC will be running three commentaries on the three political parties currently represented in Parliament – PAP, WP and SPP. We will take a look at what they have done the past year, and if they have delivered on what they have promised based on their existing presence in Parliament.

Watch this space.

 

Also Read

The PAP – facing its new mandate by Ghui

The SPP – After Potong Pasir by Benjamin Cheah

 

 

 

 

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Newsbites – no to 4G charges, and more nuclear experts for Singapore

IDA: StarHub can’t charge for 4G The Infocomm Development Authority has stopped…

UEFA Champions League kicks off but Singtel is still in negotiations for broadcasting rights

Singtel came through at the eleventh hour to announce on their Facebook…

陈振声称需赋权人民行动党 展现“正向稳定”政治因素吸引外资

贸工部长陈振声认为,在来届选举新加坡必须先向世界展示更具正向稳定的信号,吸引更多更强大的经济投资,创造良好的就业机会。 周一(11日)陈振声接受《亚洲新闻台》的采访透露,新加坡必须向世界发出相对“正向的信号”,激发投资者对新加坡的信心,以此吸引更强大的投资,制造就业机会,以让新加坡人能够安然度过低靡时刻。 他强调,纵观许多并列第一世界的国家具有多元化的政治体系,并且能够赖以生存,倘若没有强劲的经济表现、强大的投资和良好的就业机会,一个支离破碎的政治体系也会体现出缺点。 “所以,在来届选举中,我们不仅要向自己,而且要面向世界发出“正向强大”的信号,我们才能借此攀升,与竞争对手拉远距离。” 因此,陈振声表示,目前首要任务即是授权于人民行动党,告诉国际社会行动党是长期存在,即指新加坡是稳定和连贯的,同时行动党也会执行与实现所有的承诺。 他也表明,若新加坡人投向一个“无法协调分歧与带领新加坡前进”的政治制度,新加坡社会的凝聚力将会分散,更可能导致分裂的出现。 吸引外资,意味着创造更多就业机会? 尽管如此,引进外资就意味着创造更多的机会吗?我们可以从中检讨,例如樟宜商业园中也吸引大量印度软件公司,它看似为我国创造就业机会,但我们可以从中发现,他们大量聘雇印度籍工程师。 随着新加坡人的抱怨连连,情况逐渐恶化,以至于政府不得不介入调解,让这些公司聘雇更多外国人。 政府的介入也连带影响了于新加坡工作的印度专业人员,由于工作签证的条件变得严苛,导致工作签证的派发变得相当零散,甚至促使印度政府以违反贸易协定向新加坡政府投诉。 据报道,部分印度IT公司均受到影响如HCL、TCS、Infosys、Wipro、Cognizant和L&T信息技术。 印度贸易组织(Nasscom)投诉,“签证问题已拖延一段时间,自2016…

SPH CEO says company would move forward from growing property business; creator of STI removed from STI

At Singapore Press Holdings (SPH)’s annual general meeting yesterday (27 Nov), SPH…