A “GE2011 One Year On” special report

~ By Benjamin Cheah ~

In the 2011 General Elections, Chiam See Tong made his biggest gamble. The veteran politician ventured out of the traditional Singapore People’s Party (SPP) stronghold of Potong Pasir, leading a team to challenge then-Deputy Prime Minister in Bishan-Toa Payoh. Mr Chiam’s wife Lina stood in his stead, standing against Sitoh Yi Pin.

Chiam’s gamble backfired. Spectacularly.

Mr Chiam lost his bid in Bishan-Toa Payoh. Mrs Chiam lost to Sitoh Yi Pin by 114 votes. In January, six prominent members of the Singapore People’s Party resigned. The only glimmer of a silver lining is Mrs Chiam’s appointment as a Non-Constituency Member of Parliament.

In hindsight, the SPP had to fail. As discussed in my article on 7 April 2011, its campaign strategy basically banked on Mr Chiam’s brand name. Unlike other parties, it focused more on promoting personalities (primarily Mr Chiam’s) than proposing policies, and what policies the party did state during the rallies were given minimal attention and lacked focus.

Mr Chiam’s brand is intrinsically tied to his efforts in Potong Pasir. It is not easily transferrable to Mrs Chiam: for all her years of supporting Mr Chiam, she is still a newcomer to Singapore’s politics and is still untested and unproven when compared to Mr Chiam. When Mr Chiam went to Bishan-Toa Payoh, much of his brand power was diluted, and had to rely on what he did at the national level. It was clearly not enough.

The combination of poor strategy, electoral defeat and bloodletting has effectively neutered the party. Between now and the next general elections, Mr Chiam’s brand power would be further diluted, even more now that he does not have a formal voice in Parliament. He, and by extension the party, can no longer count on appealing to support from the ground to carry the day. To remain relevant, the SPP needs to re-brand itself as a national party on equal footing with opposition parties — and the People’s Action Party.

If handled properly, the SPP’s electoral defeat could be the catalyst the SPP needs for renewal. With Mr Sitoh handling the day-to-day running of Potong Pasir, the party can focus their time and energies on developing public policy, re-branding and recruitment.

To its credit, the SPP seems to have learned from its defeat.

Mrs Chiam, in her capacity as NCMP, participates actively in Parliamentary discussions. As the Party’s sole representative in Parliament, she has the dual role of being the SPP’s public face and advocating the SPP’s policy positions in Parliament. Regular engagement would keep her, and the party, in the public eye. The Online Citizen routinely publishes her speeches for our readers — but that is not enough. For the mainstream media to pay attention to her, she will need to keep herself in the public eye and keep engaging in Parliament and beyond. While she still works mainly in Potong Pasir, she needs to see herself not just as the municipal custodian in waiting, but as a stateswoman who represents the people’s voice.

Mr Chiam, while no longer a Member of Parliament, still carries weight in the public arena. His greatest assets are his tenacity, intelligence, and wealth of experience. As reported in TOC, Mr Chiam spoke at length about Singapore’s Central Provident Fund scheme during the SPP’s launch of its financial literacy programme. (https://www.theonlinecitizen.com/2012/04/chiam-see-tong-government-treats-cpf-as-a-business/) Mr Chiam would likely have insights on other issues as well. I would not be surprised if he helped Mrs Chiam with her speeches, the way she used to help him with his. He is the SPP’s greatest asset, and should be employed to the fullest of his abilities — not just as a representative of Potong Pasir, but a representative of Singapore. It seems the SPP is taking steps towards this with Mr Chiam’s speech.

In its election manifesto, the SPP wanted to raise six issues for national dialogue: cost of living, influx of foreigners, public transport,          public housing ageing population and public accountability. Mrs Chiam in Parliament has tried to do this wherever possible, by raising questions and commenting on speeches. While this is commendable, it is not enough. Currently, Mrs Chiam is mainly responding to proposals and speeches made by other MPs, or participating in debates organised by someone else. In such contexts, the SPP’s agenda can be overshadowed by everybody else. While it is unrealistic to expect the SPP to dominate the national discourse, at some point Mrs Chiam must start being proactive in Parliament. That way, she will have a better chance of commanding media attention, and further developing the SPP’s brand.

That said, the SPP seems to be raising these issues outside of Parliament. It is also moving away from the Chiam- and Potong Pasir-centric strategy of the previous GE. In March, the SPP held a job fair at Sennett Estate. (http://www.spp.org.sg/job-fair-for-singaporeans-17-18-march/) Its Financial Literacy Awareness Programme started on April 15. (https://www.theonlinecitizen.com/2012/04/public-forum-and-launch-of-the-spp-financial-literacy-awareness-programme/) Both activities, while held in Potong Pasir, were open to all Singaporeans and addressed some of Singapore’s major bread-and-butter issues.

While helping people meet their needs, the activities would reinforce pro-SPP ground sentiment in Potong Pasir and simultaneously spread the message that the SPP wants to help all people with their problems — not just those in Potong Pasir. This may signal a shift in strategy, encompassing both Potong Pasir and the rest of Singapore. By regularly starting and maintaining such initiatives, the SPP would demonstrate an ability to help people in practical ways, not merely by raising issues in Parliament. Continuing this strategy would help to cement the SPP in the national consciousness — in addition to aiding people. The SPP’s efforts in Potong Pasir would also naturally be compared to Mr Sitoh’s; it may be a sign that the SPP is laying the groundwork to contest Mr Sitoh in the next GE.

The SPP has been dealt a very poor hand, and it is doing what it can with what people and resources it has left. The SPP appears to be taking baby steps towards renewal. While it is still too early to make out the shape of the SPP’s long-term strategy, the SPP is steadfastly refusing to fade into the ash heap of history.

 

_______________

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

解封第二阶段鸡只也出来溜达 “闯”地铁站被阻

第二阶段解封开跑,除了各处购物商场出现人潮外,鸡只也不遑多让,到欧南园地铁站(Outram Park MRT)搭地铁啦! 在多个社交媒体上,有网友表示,今天(6月19日)在欧南园地铁站看到两只鸡只在地铁站出现,工作人员赶紧驱赶。 该地铁站设置在地下三层,不禁让网民好奇,这两只鸡到底是如何下到地铁站的。 在脸书群组ROADS.sg的帖文下,就有不少民众猜测鸡只到底要去哪里,有者认为是趁着解封时期去逛街或访友,有者说它们是为了被丢弃的鸡蛋报仇,而因为没有戴口罩,所以被工作人员驱赶。 然而较为了解当地情况的网友则表示,这些鸡只是来自警察广东民大厦,在艾弗顿园附近,“经常看到它们带着可爱的小鸡走来走去”。

民调反映选民认为行动党可信度下降

李光耀公共政策学院研究所,透过手机、互联网等访问4027名选民进行民意调查,了解选民的投票考量和倾向。 其中各年龄层选民对于人民行动党的可信赖程度(credibility)下降,40至49岁年龄阶层的选民跌幅最为急促,达13巴仙。35岁以下年轻选民,认为工人党比行动党更可信赖。 65岁以上选民,认为工人党可靠的反而增加至少20巴仙。认为行动党可靠的选民比率,从93下降至86巴仙。认为工人党可靠的选民,则从2015年的71巴仙,增至79巴仙。非常认同工人党可靠的选民,也从8巴仙,激增至20巴仙。 再者,认为政治应趋向多元的选民比例有所增加,至22.4巴仙。至于认同维持现状、应维持行动党一党独大局面的受访者,也从2015年的44.3巴仙,锐减至仅18.5巴仙。 在疫情当前,人们更关注政府管理的效率和民生课题,此次则要求政策的公平、确保有需要的群体能够获得帮助。不过多达89巴仙选民,如何应对冠病疫情,也左右选民的选票。  

新加坡2020大选 –问一问“要多少钱呀?”

陈华彪 PAP会有第13次的鸿运吗? 毕竟,为了收买260万选民的选票,它们承诺给家庭,社区和企业撒了近1千亿元。但是这都是纳税人的钱。反对党现在可以争辩说,有了这么一大笔钱,也足以实现他们的社会替代计划。别让用来对付反对党的种种POFMA分散注意力,迫切需要做的是针对如何为新加坡大瘟疫后社会格局定调这一课题立刻启动辩论。 在争取选民人心的竞赛中,主流媒体是在行动党绝对的掌控之中,再加上各种各样的戏法,如烟幕和镜子任由他们利用,行动党获得重大胜利是不在话下了。至少这是许多外国观察者的看法。 为什么人民行动党部长陈振声却警告选民,反对党可能赢得足够的席位组织政府呢? 在这次大选的十一个政党之中,加入行动党的人是唯一不必害怕来自讳深莫测国家的报复。对于许多人来说,加入行动党是事业生涯的进一步发展。 没有一个反对党能在组织上延伸之广和党员之多与行动党相比。自1959年以来,整部国家机器都在执政党的支配下。通过操纵高达10亿余元预算的人民协会,行动党的触须伸展到小岛的每一个角落及住户,也被默认为执政的天赋政党。 和区域周边其他依靠贪污豢养的执政党不同,人民行动党有另类的手段来资助他们庞大的政治机器,并打扮成白之又白。难怪是继中国,朝鲜和古巴共产党之后,行动党是领衔世界上不间断统治时间最长的执政党。 选择在执政期限还有一年之前进行选举,行动党企图抓紧从冠状病毒瘟疫中捞取最大的政治优势。同样的在新加坡和其他的地区,面对危机下的选民都倾向投票给现任政府。利用大瘟疫流行下举行大选,行动党能拒绝反对党举行群众大会的权利而不会受到国际的谴责。 直到宣布大选时,行动党已经通过一系列的压迫性和立法上的改变,消除了潜在的政治挑战,使反对党陷入种种困境。 POFMA,所谓的《 2019防止网络虚假信息和网络操纵法案》,现在已经是过去几天内对付反对党的一种便利工具。…

【娱乐】《放马过来》招募新马才艺新秀

你自认才华横溢,千里挑一?梦想在社交网站以外展现你的才华?亚洲心动娱乐公司(AMM)近日举办选秀节目《放马过来》(Show Off Show),希望能栽培后起之秀。 在今日的线上记者会,该公司总裁梁智强推出上述才艺秀,物色多才多艺的能人异士,和热衷歌唱、表演、主持、舞蹈和直播等方面的人才。 该公司表示,创建上述互动娱乐平台,以释放他们的才能,并放眼能吸引来自新马和其他地区的人才和粉丝。 该才艺秀将为期10周,参赛者将完成知名主持人和裁判给与的挑战和任务,挑战参赛者的临场应变和跳脱框框的思考能力。获选参赛者也有机会参加由资深演员和数码娱乐专才如梁智强和的陳邦鋆的大师班,以提升个人技能。 参与者有机会赢取总值高达19万8千元的奖金和礼品,其中首奖高达2万元、奖品价值2万3000元: 至于裁判和主持人班底也是群星显赫,中文赛裁判包括梁智强、何戀慈、谢丽萍、洪爱玲,由知名“卖鱼哥”王雷和艺人孙景祥主持。英语赛方面,则邀请DEE KOSH、MELISSA THNG 、古玛和TOSH ZHANG等艺人为裁判,以及NOAH…