~ By Texas Hong ~

A cleaning lady works in the pantry of my office, doing simple chores. Let’s call her Lucy. Yesterday, she told me how she admired the design of my cup that I use in the office. Curiously, she wanted to know how much I bought it for.

“Ten dollars”, I said proudly, thinking that I managed a good deal.

Lucy walked away with her head bowed; muttering words which meant that it is very expensive and that I must be earning a lot of money. No I do not earn a lot of money, but to the cleaning lady, she thinks I do.

This made me reflect upon the on-going debate about Professor Lim Chong Yah’s proposal to structurally raise wages of low income earners. This made Lim Swee Say remind Singaporeans of the connection between productivity and wages.

Am I more productive than her? Surely the chores that she does for a living is something I dare not imagine undertaking myself. What made me so special in comparison to her such that I am earning so much more than her? I sit at my desk plodding away on my keyboard every day, swapping contracts at a macro level. Is this what we mean by being productive?

Singapore is not a pin-making factory in Adam Smith’s hypothetical world, it is a country. While we try to remain competitive in the global village, we have created too much social division in this nation. It is saddening to see our labour movement subscribe to bare naked economics plucked from ‘A’ levels textbooks.

Lim Swee Say’s assertion is not wrong. In the globalised world today, we must try our best to source for the cheapest input (in this case, labour) and maximise the value of our output to remain competitive. Just as critics label Professor Lim’s idea as something which ignores the productivity function, they have also forgotten about the social disparity function which is a serious problem to any country in the world.

In a capitalist society, companies cream off profits from their business ventures on the back of people like Lucy. It is time to redistribute some of these profits back to these people through the most direct way – wages, not handouts.

While Lucy might be benefitting from state-sponsored handouts because of her low income, I hope for the day that she does not find my cup expensive.


Headline illustration courtesy of Hub Pages

______________________________

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Reform Party’s Kenneth Jeyaretnam challenges “fake news”, a COVID-19 election, advantages for PAP

After his pre-Nomination day video on Tuesday morning (30 June), the Reform’s…

Outflow of income from SG economy by MNCs and foreign workers

by Chris Kuan A number of FB friends were asking me about…

浪浪收容中心面临倒闭危机,网民纷发起捐款助度难关

我国一家流浪动物收容中心Animal Lovers League 因积欠四万余元的租金,面临倒闭,日前在社交网络媒体上发文号召民众捐款,希望度过困难,确保被收养的动物不会流离失所。 收容中心表示,他们目前已收留了约500只流浪猫狗,一旦收容中心倒闭,该500只毛小孩或再次回到街头流浪。 文中解释,收容中心每月需支付庞大的业务费如毛小孩的医疗服务及食物,而收容中心为了支付开销,也曾号召民众赞助“支付最低寄宿费用”,每个月以60-100新元赞助毛小孩,但未能获得长期赞助,甚至已被遗忘。 为了能够拯救毛小孩的住所,Animal Lovers League决定发文恳求民众的拨款。 此文发出后,许多网民纷纷表示愿意协助收容中心度过困难。部分网民认为政府应出面解决收容中心的问题。   网友IsThat…

Workers’ Party balances Hougang and national issues

~ By Benjamin Cheah ~ Desmond Choo is not independent of the People’s Action…