~ By Seker Sb ~

The advantage of growing up a minority in Singapore is that you adapt. We adapt to the name calling that begins in nurseries and kindergarten and we continue to adapt when we realize that those names could only have been passed on from adults. We adapt to the sino-centric sports teams at primary school. We adapt to people speaking in the mainstream language in group meetings in secondary school and we take pride in the fact that you actually understand what they are saying. We adapt to the cruel jokes that use only the colour of our skin as a basis. We adapt to the fact that apart from us and others like us, no one else thinks it is anything other than normal to in fact do so.

 
We adapt to the concept of SAP schools and the countless other instances of an expression of dominance, of the culture, language and worldview of the majority. And we adapt despite knowing that the laws of our land say otherwise. We adapt to the history of Singapore being taught as if its connection to the peninsula was an aberration and therefore deny its natural heritage. We adapt to other distortions of history when they tell us the railways were built by menial "coolies" without also referencing that they were prisoners of war who had, prior to their capture, taken up arms to free their own motherland.
 
We adapt to the uninhibited entrenchment of stereotypes during National Service and we serve nonetheless. We even adapt when they tell us that we have a greater propensity to become traitors because some madman somewhere detonates a bomb and he happens to share a religion/race with us. We adapt to the quotas on places at universities and we adapt to job advertisements which preclude on the basis of language. We adapt when they tell us it is economics at play, as though language has no bearing on race or ethnicity.
 
We adapt when the elected representatives speak openly about the shortcomings of particular minority groups as if they were genetic predispositions as opposed to a failure to ensure equality of opportunity. We adapt to the fact that officials fail to realize that social engineering in Singapore has led to widespread social alienation. We adapt to the endless touting of meritocracy regardless. 
 
But at some point, we stop adapting. When does that happen? When it becomes acceptable to publicly liken a race to dogs, as Ms Shimun Lai did not too long ago. When others jump on the bandwagon to shield the initial commentator from criticism, as Mr Stanley Hart has seen fit to do. When it becomes acceptable to publicly take a photo of young children and affix a label likening them to terrorists and not be either remorseful or repentant.
When minorities begin to feel the shift of publicly acceptable behavior against their interests. When minorities begin to realize that increasingly, individuals are acting on their prejudices publicly, apparently without a fear of consequence. When the minorities do what they can to right this trend by turning to all available state and institutional actors and realize that Singapore's famed method of tip-toeing around instances of racism is just not good enough. When minorities realize, in hindsight, that these are not just instances, but trends they have long become accustomed to.
 
When minorities realize that those who made these comments either did not have any minority friends/followers within their social network or did not care about the sentiments of what few they did have. Both are horrifying in their own way.
 
But mostly, we stop adapting when realize that the avenues open to us are few and ineffectual. When we realize that whilst it was our choice to adapt and not make it an issue every single time we were insulted by word, deed, or omission, it certainly is not a choice we want our children to have to consider making.
 
To the very many wonderful friends, teachers, mentors and random individuals of the majority I have come across, I am sorry I even have to write this.

But I must.


This article first appeared as a facebook note on the author's personal facebook page and was erroneously attributed as anonymous earlier. TOC thanks Seker Sb for allowing us to republish his article on our website.

Headline photo courtesy of ComeSingapore.com.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

军人闯砂边界绑架五平民 印尼认错保证不重演

马国砂拉越的马印边界地区,惊传印尼军人闯入砂拉越境内,持械绑架五名砂拉越平民。他们先释放两人,再索要赎金,经马国军方斡旋后,最终另三人皆获释放。 根据《新海峡时报星期刊》报导,五名砂拉越人是在本月11日,是在毗邻印尼边界的Balai Ringin的甘榜Danau Melikin的森林收集木材,当地距离印尼加里曼丹边界仅400公尺。 他们遭到两名身穿军装迷彩服的男子伏击,他们身上有5.56毫米的Pindad SS-1突击步枪,是印尼国防部的标准武器装备。 被迫承认偷盗木材 五人全被捆绑,人质年龄介于15至64岁。他们被押往印尼境内的双溪恩特里哨站,还被迫承认偷印尼木材,头上被盖上黑色帽子。间中,印尼军人被指拿枪指着人质,还对空中开了两枪。 人质后来向警方投诉,除了背部和腿部遭军人鞭打,他们还被役使前往河边,帮军人收集食用水。 五名人质中,其中一对兄弟在11日下午四时左右就被释放,但另三人还在印尼军人的哨站过夜。被释放者被要求告知家属,需准备一万令吉赎金和两个新电锯。 马军方介入谈判  隔天人质即获释…

学生反映媒体过度渲染教师检查内衣颜色一事

本月29日,《新明日报》报导,指南洋女中学生家长向该报申诉,有老师在突击检查女学生内衣颜色时,,竟打开衣领纽扣,直接拉扯出内衣肩带,认为这种做法不恰当,并引发家长学生不满。 据报导,有关事件发生于本月22日。有关老师是中四年级主任。由于其中一班的级任老师是男的,不能进行衣着检查,便由该名主任代劳。 由于学校的校服是白色的,校方有规定,学生的内衣必须是白色或肉色,不能是任何其他颜色。 但这名老师被指在检查过程中,将学生衣领处纽扣解开,拉出学生内衣肩带检查。家长在申述时指有数名女学生都受到如此对待,而感到不满。 至于英媒《海峡时报》则报导,南洋女中公关主任坦言女教师的检查手法“可能引起学生不适”,在文告提及,校长也电邮给所有家长解释此事并致歉。 与此同时,也有一些学生在社交媒体对于教师的检查手法表达失望,不过目前这些贴文已被移除。 虽然媒体报导显示学生对此事感到失望,不过有关事件被检查的其中一名女学生现身说法,认为媒体可能过度渲染此事,实际上在当时老师进行突击检查,并没有向媒体所描述的那般糟糕。 老师尽责   已获校内师生原谅 名为Aurora Woo在脸书留言指出,实际上有关教师是好老师,尽责也受学生爱戴。 “老师的本意是要检查内衣颜色,大部分学生她也只是透过肩膀透视观察,只有对一名学生要求解开领扣。校方也承认和老师的沟通有出现误会,并不需要解开衣扣。而那名老师事后也马上向有关同学道歉。”…

PM Lee’s ESS speech and Q & A session

Economic Society of Singapore Annual Dinner 2012 Question & Answer Seesion –…

Grassroots leader helps build close to 5,000 BTO flats for HDB

A full-page advertisement appeared on ST today (31 Dec) congratulating Mr Von…