~by: Ghui~

The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) has issued a statement in response to calls for the abolition of the Internal Security Act (ISA) in Singapore by ex- ISA detainees (see HERE).

Pointing to the evolution of the ISA as Singapore’s circumstances, vulnerability and risk tolerance changes, the ministry stated that the “instrument of last resort” has enabled the nation to “counter serious security threats, protect our people, and preserve our racial harmony and social cohesion”.

Reiterating a point already made, the authority said, “It (the ISA) remains relevant and necessary in today’s evolving security environment, for keeping Singapore safe and secure” (see HERE).

There are other tools besides the ISA at Singapore’s disposal to combat this problem. Acts such as the Sedition Act, Corrosive and Explosive Substances and Offensive Weapons Act, Vandalism Act, the Terrorism (Suppression of Bombings) Act and the Terrorism (Suppression of Financing) Act are all laws that can be effectively utilised to deal with the threat of terrorism. In fact, I would argue that these acts are more useful in dealing with the threat of terrorism because they target the problem more specifically. So if the combat of terrorism is the main justification for the retention of the ISA, then the ISA is superfluous.

The ISA has been criticised as opaque and vague. Indeed Section 8 of the ISA (see HERE) confers on the government the right to arrest and detain individuals without trial for up to two years at a time if the President is satisfied that to do so:

  1. would prevent that person from acting in any manner prejudicial to the security of Singapore or any part thereof; or
  2. if such detention was for the maintenance of public order or essential services therein.

The wide way in which Section 8 is drafted is open to abuse because terms such as “prejudicial to the security of Singapore” or the “maintenance of public order” are subject to interpretation. Its retention therefore leaves Singaporeans in a situation whereby the most draconian sanctions can be imposed on an individual on the basis of an act which is subjective.

How can the ISA keep Singapore safe and secure if its citizens are unsure of its exact remit? When something is shrouded in mystery, people tend to worry and speculate. Far from keeping Singapore safe and secure, the ISA could arguably keep citizens fearful and anxious.

The ISA should be abolished in line with the fact that the threats of communists are a relic of the past. There are other laws in place that can deal with the security of our nation effectively.

Where an individual’s freedom can be arbitrarily taken away without trial, people need to know exactly where their boundaries lie. A law that imposes such a fearsome sanction has to be clear about what acts an individual needs to commit before he or she triggers that punishment. As it stands, the ISA ‘s ability to deprive one of his or her liberty without trial and without a clear list of transgressing crimes is outdated, unnecessary and unfair.


Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

“乐于助人”邀政治人物体验拾荒者生活 惟无法透过募捐平台筹资

非营利组织“乐于助人基金”(Happy People Helping People)为了协助拾荒老人筹款,将邀请政治人物参加体验活动“穿上他的鞋走一英里” (A Mile In Their Shoes),让他们体验5小时的拾荒老人的生活,从中了解这些老人所面临的困难。 其中受邀政治人物包括人民行动党以及各党派人士,而答应出席有新加坡民主党三人、革新党二人、以及前进党和人民力量党各一人。人民之声两人则表示可能参与,“乐于助人基金“也邀请了非政治人物参与。 为了能够在活动期间筹集资金,乐于助人基金也计划使用募捐平台Give.Asia进行筹资,最终所获得的资金将平均分配给约150名老人。然而,在筹资这条路上可说是困难重重,由于Give.Asia不能透过募捐平台进行“政治活动”,迫使乐于助人基金只能再寻觅替代的筹款方式。 本社也针对此事向Give.Asia询问,但尚待回复。…

客工宿舍疫情爆发 陈川仁称不应仅归因于宿舍环境

国会议长陈川仁认为,客工宿舍疫情大爆发,不能仅仅归因于宿舍内的糟糕生活环境,反之冠状病毒19的高度传染力和群体住在封闭住所,更可能助长疫情传播。 陈川仁在2014至2015年间出任人力部长。根据《海峡时报》报导,他是在昨日(7日)出席客工宿舍一项活动期间,接受媒体采访时这么表示。 陈川仁认为,不应把客工宿舍糟糕生活环境,与冠病疫情混为一谈。他举例,假设大学生继续留在大学宿舍,也可能出现大规模爆发。“如果人们住在密集场所,加上病毒传染的性质,会形成疫情爆发。” 截至5月7日,本地新增741病例,累计确诊增至2万0939例。 陈川仁称无意为一些“恶劣”宿舍环境的个案“洗白”,不过也不能一竿子打翻整船人,认为所有宿舍环境都是如此。他也认为,对于那些违反法律的雇主仍应采取行动。 陈川仁曾指他国被迫锁国,因未能管控病毒传播 不过,回溯3月25日,陈川仁曾指出,其他国家被迫转向“封境”措施,是因为未能一开始管控住传播,导致后来病例数增长、医疗体系不堪重负。 “这正是在中国、伊朗、意大利发生的事,接下来会是… …?”他也指当前这些国家只能采取封锁减缓病毒传播,但他担忧可能已错过防堵窗口。陈川仁也指我国还在可控范围,还不到上述国家的地步,因为一开始就已采取措施,例如香港、台湾和韩国也展示他们如何应对疫情。

$130 million disbursed to about 87,000 beneficiaries under ComCare in 2015

Ministry of Social and Family Development (MSF) has announced that the Government’s…