Leong Sze Hian/

I refer to the article “Seven trade unions endorse Tony Tan: Presidential candidate also holds dialogue with SMCCI members, pays tribute to Malay community” (Today, Aug 12).

It states that:

“The seven unions are the first from the labour movement to announce their decision, following the NTUC’s new approach on endorsing presidential candidates.

NTUC chief Lim Swee Say had said earlier that unlike in the past Presidential Elections when it had thrown its support behind a candidate, this time round, the labour movement will facilitate opportunities for union leaders to meet the presidential hopefuls and let them decide who to support.”

Despite the NTUC chief’s remarks, NTUC’s president said on the same day that Dr Tony Tan “fits the bill” as the President.

So, isn’t this almost akin to an endorsement?

I believe many Singaporeans may be looking forward to the NTUC chief carrying out his facilitation of “opportunities for union leaders to meet the presidential hopefuls and let them decide who to support”, now that the opportunity has already been given to the first of the Presidential candidates, Dr Tony Tan. I think the other three “Tans” may be awaiting anxiously too.

Big sacrifice for the people

With regard to “Dr Tony Tan, who was the executive director of the Government of Singapore Investment Corporation (GIC) before he resigned in order to put himself forward for the election”, I would like to applaud Dr Tony Tan for taking the unprecedented step of resigning from SPH and GIC, even though there is no requirement for him to do so.

This sacrifice on his part, in standing as a candidate for the Presidency, is not unsubstantial in monetary terms, as he is voluntarily giving up his current and possibly any future remuneration from these appointments.

Not fair to candidate?

As the Government has always had a candidate in the Presidential elections, with walkovers in the last two elections, why is it that the Government is not having a candidate for this coming elections?

Whilst I appreciate and accept Dr Tony Tan’s explanation that he is standing as an independent candidate without the backing of any political party or at the suggestion of the Government, in my view, unless the Government comes out with a statement to explain why it is not endorsing a candidate this time round, Dr Tony Tan’s chances may naturally be somewhat diminished by the Government’s silence in this regard.

With Dr Tony Tan’s sterling record of public service, it may in a way be quite unfair to him, and perhaps a loss to Singapore that he does not win if he starts his candidacy with the above-mentioned disadvantage.

So far, many members of Government, including the Prime Minister and former Senior Minister, have said that Dr Tony Tan would make a good President, short of an outright endorsement.

In this connection, media reports and the internet blogs are already abuzz about this issue.


Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

New citizens will never let the PAP down

Augustine Low writes that Singapore’s new citizens, who receive numerous benefits and privileges, owe their allegiance to the country. As new citizens are likely to back the ruling People’s Action Party, the low fertility rate gives the party an excuse and an opportunity to welcome more new citizens each year.

Jakarta riots: Deadly violence continues for second night in Indonesia after election result gave Joko Widodo victory

Violence has escalated into a second night of raging riots in the…

DJ Glenn Ong’s deeply hurtful comments

Update: Glenn Ong in commenting on his Facebook to this article requested…

“寒蝉效应甚于诽谤法” 施仁乔忧防假消息法遭滥用

媒体研究学者施仁乔教授(Cherian George)担忧,防止假消息法产生的寒蝉效应远甚于现有的诽谤法。只要政府认为“公众对政府信心遭削弱”,或者有散播群体间敌意和仇恨的威胁,该法赋予更广泛的权力来抑制批评声音。 任何部长都长或政府部门,都可以委任一个“主管当局”(Competent Authority)来执法。施仁乔形容,这种权限是很罕见的,因为一般仅让特定部长有法律权限。 再者,也没有安排监督机构,来监管如何裁定消息真伪。 目前任教于香港浸会大学传播研究中心的施仁乔,2014年也曾担任南洋理工大学副教授。 在获悉防止假消息法出炉后,他对于法案草案中的内容产生忧虑,在日前撰文对该法案分析评述。 他指出,比较可行的媒体管制,监管机构理应尽量避免政治干预,但是新法案却强制执法当局需服从指示,却没有任何独立的监管机制: 12 – (5) Once…