The following is an extract from Yawning Bread:

The prosecution’s case against Zainal Kuning appeared watertight. They had a confession from him that he had stabbed to death Ang Chye, 65, a caretaker of a Yishun coffeeshop, on 2 February 1989, in what was alleged to be a bungled burglary. Zainal fit the profile of a likely burglar — a manual labourer, aged 30. He must have needed money.

He was accused of the murder alongside his friend Salahuddin Ismail. Salahuddin’s brother, Mohmad Bashir Ismail, was also charged with murder originally, but had his charge reduced to burglary.

At the trio’s trial, however, Zainal denied that his confession was voluntarily given. He claimed that he had been tortured and police officers had led him to believe that his accomplices had already fingered him as the one who had stabbed the caretaker and that if he confessed, he might get a lesser sentence.

Unfortunately, it is quite common for defendants to claim that their confessions were extracted through torture and generally courts are skeptical. The police officers involved strenuously denied mistreating him. Justice T S Sinnathuray ruled that the confession was voluntary, and with that, Zainal’s fate was virtually sealed.

This case is recounted in Chapter One of a little-known book Lee’s Law: How Singapore crushes dissent, by Chris Lydgate, 2003. I should thank the Singapore Democratic Party for a brief reference to this case on their website — this was what led me to look up the book and the Straits Times’ stories myself.

Pages 5 and 6 of Chapter One describe  the torture Zainal claimed to have suffered. I shall spare readers the chilling details. Suffice it to say, it must have been severe enough to get someone to sign a confession that could lead straight to the hangman’s noose.

Other than the confession, however, the prosecution had no physical evidence that it was Zainal and Salahuddin who murdered the elderly man, or that they were even there at the coffeeshop that night. Despite this, the defendants’ chances looked extremely slim.

Continue reading here.

Further reading here.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

SCDF firefighters extinguish fire at CK Building after 16-hour battle

The fire at the CK Building along Tampines Street was so massive…

轿车鲁莽换车道 送餐员疑被撞倒路上

  银色轿车鲁莽换车道,没顾及后方的其他道路使用者,结果一辆尾随在后骑电单车送餐员,连人带车倒在路上。 但令网民愤怒的是,轿车竟无视事故发生,继续行驶离开,让人看了都不禁问到,“有没有搞错?!”。 一段誌期9月13日、行车记录器所拍摄到的车祸经过短片在脸书流传,根据脸书群组SG Road Vigilante,有关意外发生在中央快速公路的一条分支路前。 网民纷纷炮轰“难以接受这样的驾驶方式”,指责银色轿车的驾驶者不应该连续越过两条车道、转回原来车道时,也应该让路给原路上道路使用者。 然而有些网民认为银色轿车并没有真正撞到电单车送餐员,是送餐员因闪避时紧急刹车而导致电单车打滑。 (短片源自脸书群组SG Road Vigilante)