G Hui/

I read with disappointment that British author Alan Shadrake’s appeal against a conviction for contempt of court was dismissed by the Singapore Court of Appeal on Friday, 27 May 2011. Is such a harsh sentence necessary? Is a custodial sentence needed? Has he even committed a crime?

Whether or not the death penalty should be abolished is a separate issue. Whether or not Shadrake has locus standi to comment on Singapore’s laws as a foreigner is likewise a separate point.

I had expected GE 2011 to be the dawn of a new age. Clearly, I had been too hopeful.

PM Lee Hsien Loong pledged that there will be changes within the People’s Action Party (PAP). The cabinet reshuffle added credence to that promise. It is therefore regrettable that Singapore has not taken his opportunity to rejuvenate certain aspects of its legal process. By and large Singapore’s legal system is world class. Be that as it may, there are certain areas that are sorely in need of change.

Shadrake was charged and found guilty of “scandalising the judiciary” in his book, “Once a Jolly Hangman”. I have read the book. It is not particularly well written, nor is it exceptionally sensational. All it did was raise some questions in relation to how the death penalty is used and how it can be unfairly applied. He is not the first person to raise these concerns nor will he be the last. The only mistake he made was to promote the book in Singapore.

The Attorney General, in explaining why charges were brought against the author, said ”public confidence in the Singapore Judiciary cannot be allowed, in any way to be tarnished or diminished by any contumacious behaviour”. Public confidence in the judiciary is of utmost importance. However, such

confidence must be earned. It cannot be asserted with force. Blind loyalty and faith cannot be demanded. This high handed statement sounds remarkably like the PAP’s past mantra.

By imposing such a harsh sentence, the courts of Singapore have achieved precisely the opposite result of what it wanted. It has created publicity for Shadrake and for the book. Had the courts, or the Attorney General, simply ignored the book or issued a statement casting doubt on its claims without taking the matter further, the debacle would have died down. Now, however, everyone knows about it and wants to read it. By attempting to quash the book, they have succeeded in giving the book credibility.

Those in power in Singapore have to be more mature in how it deals with supposed criticism.

Suppression only leads to oppression, which will in turn boil over. Criticism must be engaged and questions must be answered. The Government should have addressed each of Shadrake’s accusations, citing why each of them was untrue, without embarking on the legal route through the courts. This would go a long way in building public trust and goodwill.

All in power have to be accountable to the people over whom it wields power. This applies equally to the judiciary, the executive and the legislative. . Being able to deal with questions such as those raised by Shadrake would be a start.


Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

军方公布初步调查 网民:为何冯伟衷被夹伤?安全程序是否到位?

三军总长王赐吉中将率领陆军总长吴仕豪少将等人,于昨午召开新闻发布会,向公众交代初步调查结果。吴仕豪指出,冯伟衷当时和另一军备技术员,准备维修自走炮,维修时需先降炮管从高位降下到待机位置。 炮管降下时,位于炮塔内的炮管后端,会往后延伸。相信当时冯伟衷是被往后延伸的炮尾压伤。 然而, 新闻发布会上,军方领导并未解释,为何炮管下降时,只有冯伟衷身在炮塔内。至于另一技术员和炮塔指挥官,为何没发现冯伟衷位在炮尾后端。 吴仕豪表示目前公布的是冯伟衷所属营单位,在新西兰做的初步调查,事故原因仍待独立调查委员会,调查后才能下定论。 至于王赐吉中将表示,目前陆军部队已暂停所有国内外军训,包括野外训练和实弹演习,并把更多时间放在检讨军训中的安全步骤。 同时,武装部队也将全面降低军训密集度,把更多精力放到军训安全上。王赐吉说“现有军训是否太快、强度太大、活动太多?可能需删除一些活动,用更多时间调整更适中的军训水平。” 王赐吉:“武装部队整体安全体系仍健全” 有现场记者问及,冯伟衷发生事故,也意味着军中在一年半内已发生了五起事故。对此军方是否仍有忽略掉的安全问题。对此王赐吉仍坚称整体武装部队安全体系仍健全,并表示军方“绝不推卸责任”,会从每次事故汲取教训,实施更严格的安全措施。 他也表示“有责任确保服役人员训练后都能安全回家”。 网民关注为何事故发生? 媒体报导王赐吉等军方领袖的宣布后,许多网民也在各大媒体脸书留言,群众更为关注的是,事故为何发生?为何冯伟衷仍在炮塔内的情况下,是谁下令降下炮管?安全程序是否做足?…

WP reaches out to fellow opposition parties to avoid 3-cornered battles

By Lin Lijuan Once friends on the same side, now competitors on…

“父亲迈向激化” 女儿上网求助

一名网友在Reddit网站里针对父亲近日极端亲中而自我激化(self-radicalisation),向网民征求建议。 网友Poppraline则在Reddit上求解,指近日也开始意识到父亲在不停观看“宣传中国实力”的视频,并且已有一年以上。 “几乎每天早晚,他开始观看一些有关中国的视频,他们通常都是由机器发出的人声或以非常愤怒的语气说话的视频,大部分都是中文,有些则是美式英文。 她也叙述,不仅如此,她也认为自本地电视台开始向播放来自中国的节目,并删除大量来自台湾的节目后,父亲似乎开始接触了这些视频,并作出愈发极端的评论,如例如有关冠病19 是西方针对亚洲种族的生化武器等阴谋论、嘲笑白人死于冠病19病毒等。 因此,种种行为也引发网友的注意,网友称如今父亲的行为可能有激进化的现象,只好上网向有相同经历的网友求助。 自我激进化指通过挑战既定规范和政策的合法性,采取激进的立场,而激进化的过程因人而异,可以在长时间或短时间内发酵。 网友澄清,本身并非亲中或亲美,但父亲的行为也逐渐影响母亲,也让网友担心未来的生活,是否会出现更激进化的行为。 对此,也引发许多网友的关注,并分享自己也遇到相同的情况,并给出一些建议。 网友 kiral00 :…


我国投票站在今晚(7月10日)10时正,全部关闭,并在约11时30分,抽样结果陆续出炉。 所谓的抽样计票结果,是指每个投票站的计票助理,在各党监票员和候选人面前随机抽取100张选票进行计算,之后再结合同一选区内所有投票站的抽样成绩,平均统计出候选人或候选团队的得票率。 截至目前为止,所接获的抽样结果成绩如下: 武吉巴督: 人民行动党57%  对   民主党43% 丰加北:  人民行动党 63% 对   前进党…