Leong Sze Hian /

I refer to the article, “Khaw’s advice: Apply for flats in new towns; chances are better” (ST, May 31).

The report says:

“Mr Khaw’s latest announcement (to build more BTOs in mature estates) gives hope to buyers like human resources executive Teo Yingying, 25, who has applied for a BTO flat with her boyfriend five times with no success. She is hoping for a BTO launch in Tanjong Pagar where she now lives with her parents.

‘I want to be near my parents, if we ever have children, my parents can help me take care of them when we’re working’, she said”.

If engaged couples like Miss Teo and her boyfriend decide not to marry, they will have to pay a 10 per cent penalty of the flat’s purchase price.

If a CPF Housing Grant is involved, the penalty to pay back the grant includes accrued interest.

Can HDB disclose how many young, engaged couples changed their mind and ended up being saddled with huge financial losses.

How much in total has the HDB collected from such penalties?

One of the reasons that are contributing to record divorce rates now may be that couples are literally being forced to marry when their flat is due, or marry even if they don’t really want to, because of the withdrawal penalty.

Shouldn’t this policy be reviewed, instead of arguably just playing to the gallery, with talk of more BTOs in mature estates?

Also, unless the Market Subsidy Pricing policy is reviewed, BTOs in mature estates may mean even higher prices – which may lead to greater financial stress, higher risk of default on the mortgage, less funds for retirement, etc. (“CPF Minimum Sum to be revised to $131k”, ST, Jun 1)

To just cite people preferring to stay near their parents as the reason why BTOs in mature estates are heavily over-subscribed, may be somewhat overly simplistic.

There may be other reasons such as:

– There have been very few BTOs in mature estates. Therefore, demand may be due to the very low supply historically.

– Historical price data may indicate that mature estates appreciate in value faster than non-mature estates. Therefore, from an investing or money-for-value perspective, buyers who can afford may prefer mature estates.

– I believe the rentals in mature estates have  also been higher on a rental yield basis.

– As the historical wage data seem to indicate, the majority of middle and lower-income households may no longer be able to afford the much higher mature estates’ BTO prices. However, the 70th to 80th percentile may also not be able to afford private property. So, this group may have a tendency to prefer mature estates’ BTOs, from an affordability – lifestyle preference perspective.

Can the Minister cite some statistics to support his statement – how many of those who applied for mature estates’ BTOs did so primarily to live near their parents?

Higher HDB profits?

Since the construction industry’s capacity is around 20,000 flats a year, building more in mature estates may translate to higher profits for the HDB, and less flats for the lower-income.

Priority to lower-income?

In my view, in light of the current acute housing shortage, particularly for lower-income and financially stretched families due to the HDB’s policies on eligibility for divorcees, singles, second-timers, income ceiling, resale levy, loan eligibility and conditions, etc, the immediate policy review priority should not be towards higher-income Singaporeans at the expense of the lower or middle-income.

Longer construction period?

The average BTO construction delivery period has edged up to around 4 years or 48 months, a far cry from the former National Development Minister’s reply in Parliament just last year, that the average BTO construction period is only 32 months.

What’s the point of saying we will keep building more when it may keep getting longer to get your flat?

Read also: Focus on HDB (Part 1): The more the merrier?

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Wuhan mayor admits lack of transparency in informing public about the outbreak; partially blames the Beijing government

The mayor of Wuhan, the city that’s at the centre of the…

阿兹敏否认涉及性爱短片 两小时后再传出次轮“爆料”

马来西亚男男性爱短片传出后,原产业副部长三苏依斯干达的高级机要秘书哈兹阿兹(Haziq Aziz)昨天凌晨在脸书上承认自己是其中一人,更指经济事务部长阿兹敏是另一人。阿兹敏较后于昨午5时否认了有关的指控,但是在他刚刚做出否认的两小时后,第二轮的性爱短片和照片又在WhatsApp群组中散布。 在面对众多争议后,阿兹敏终于在昨日下午5时20分发表文告,强烈否认涉及有关短片,更怒斥这是一场政治阴谋。 怒斥为政治阴谋 他指出,有关诽谤是一场策划了数个月的恶意阴谋,旨在破坏其声誉,推翻并摧毁他的政治生涯。 他在有关文告中也提到,他和家人的安全在斋戒月的最后一周频频受到威胁,不断被他人指责涉及贪污。因此他有理由相信,这项阴谋在数个月就已经展开了。 他表示将通过正当法律途径对付并揭发涉及此阴谋的人士,已经指示律师对作出有关恶意指责人士采取行动。 他也表示,相信警方和反贪会会采取必要的行为,并认为类似手段应该杜绝于新马来西亚时代。 至于目前,他将不会对任何要转移其视线的人认输,仍然会注重在推行稳定经济发展政策。 安华同情阿兹敏经历 人民公正党则针对此事件,于当天下午5时30分召开了政治局会。此外,公正党领袖都促请各界及党员们,停止散播和议论有关的短片。 多名政党领袖都抵达公正党总部,惟阿兹敏没有现身。…