The Singapore economy is near breaking point and cannot be sustained going forward without society tearing apart, says a former government economic planner who has just completed a 45-page paper “Creating Jobs and Enterprise in a new Singapore economy – Ideas for Change”. Tan Jee Say feels strongly that new economic directions are urgently needed to prevent a socio-economic tragedy from unfolding, and he has proposed a $60 billion National Regeneration Plan to transform Singapore into a knowledge-based regional services hub that puts Singaporeans first in jobs and enterprises created in a new Singapore economy.

Jee Say’s analysis and prescription are persuasive, according to Lord Butler who as Head of the British Civil Service in the 1980s and 1990s, oversaw the “painful transition” of the United Kingdom from a predominantly manufacturing economy to a knowledge-based one. Lord Butler commended the paper and described it as a thorough and well-argued piece of work that deserves the attention of policy makers.

The following is the first in a three-part summary extract from the soon-to-be-published paper.

by Tan Jee Say

The Singapore economy has become more volatile in recent years, with business cycle fluctuations becoming more pronounced, and Singapore experiencing three recessions (1998, 2001 and 2009) in the past 15 years, in contrast to only one recession (1985) in the 30 years between 1965 and 1995. The greater volatility led to more job losses that lasted for longer periods. Volatility has resulted in lower growth.

Low Productivity

Singapore’s low labour productivity growth in recent years is a statistical phenomenon and is the result, not the cause, of our poor economic performance. To focus on raising productivity as a key economic strategy, an old and discredited strategy adopted by the government since the early 1980’s, is like putting the cart before the horse – can we expect it to succeed when it has failed to do so in the last 30 years with productivity continuing to be stuck in the lows to this very day in spite of all the high-sounding campaigns by high-level productivity councils? Rather we should focus our minds on economic policy because it is bad economic policy that has resulted in Singapore’s heavy dependence on foreign unskilled and low-skilled workers that in turn pulls down labour productivity.

Unsustainability of Manufacturing

A major contributor to the increased economic volatility was manufacturing which has been promoted by the government in the past 5 decades as a key pillar of its economic growth strategy. The strategy was successful in the first 2 decades but by the early 1980’s, it was running into bottlenecks as Singapore’s constraints manifested themselves.

Singapore has little comparative or competitive advantage for manufacturing to flourish as land, labour and skills are in short supply. The manufacturing sector can only remain viable in Singapore through more subsidized factory land and space, uninterrupted inflow of cheap foreign labour, and generous tax holidays and other giveaways. Such economic distortions in the last thirty years have delayed Singapore’s economic restructuring. We cannot afford and should not tolerate further wastage, not even for another year.

Two additional factors weigh against manufacturing – firstly, most top students are not opting to read engineering as their first choice in the local universities and polytechnics, a trend that does not augur well for the innovative potential of nor the prospect for ‘complex manufacturing’ , a niche that the ESC wants to promote; and secondly, Singaporeans are happier working in the services sector than in manufacturing industry. Without a happy and talented workforce, can complex manufacturing succeed in a sustainable way?

Which Services for the Future?

Singapore’s future lies in services. We can thrive as a dedicated services hub for the region as we had done so in the past as a vibrant commercial metropolis even before Singapore went into manufacturing in a big way in the 1960’s.The rest of the region has also progressed as we have. To continue to be relevant to them, we have to develop into a full-fledged integrated services hub with the best offerings available in the field. It should be knowledge-based that will capitalise on Singaporeans’ high level of education and experience of the world’s best practices. It must be the right kind of services that do not exploit or offend the sensitivities of the region.

Picture credit:

The two huge casinos are the wrong kind of services activities to have. Economic development is more than just about generating jobs and income growth. There is a moral purpose as well, otherwise we might as well turn Singapore into a prostitution hub or a distribution centre for drugs which will bring us untold riches. Economic development is about developing and using human capital to produce decent and worthwhile goods and services in a sustained way.

On the other hand, casinos are a soft option that preys on human weakness to generate profits. They destroy the work ethic and lead to broken families and other social problems. The casinos should be closed down so that Singapore can part company with those who choose to prosper through vices such as gambling, prostitution or drugs; only then can Singaporeans once again walk tall and proud on the high and honourable path to economic development and prosperity.

To make up for the economic loss from closing down the casinos, we need to move aggressively to develop those services we are currently good at providing so as to yield quick returns such as services involving the port, transport connectivity, financial institutions, education and healthcare. While we can be proud of having good basic infrastructure, there are still serious gaps to be filled particularly in education and healthcare. Once these holes are plugged, Singapore will have a fully developed infrastructure that will enable it not only to uplift the well-being and standard of living of its own citizens but also have additional capacity to serve the needs of the region.

End of Part One. You can read Part Two here


The writer was with the Ministry of Trade and Industry from 1979 to 1985 where he headed economic and manpower planning and also served as secretary to the late Dr Albert Winsemius, the economic adviser to the Singapore Government. From 1985-1990, he was the principal private secretary to Mr Goh Chok Tong. In 1990, he went into investment banking and subsequently took up fund management. He is a Chartered Fellow of the Chartered Institute for Securities & Investment. He is a graduate of Oxford University where he read philosophy, politics and economics.

He will be sharing his insights of the Budget 2011 this coming Saturday 19th Feb at TOC’s Budget Forum 2011.

Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

15国宣布明年越南签署RCEP协定 印度不参与

东盟昨日在声明中指出,区域全面经济伙伴关系协定(RCEP)的15个参与国,已完成谈判,并宣布预定明年2月在越南签署协定。 但15国中不包括印度,印度总理莫迪在曼谷举行的RCEP峰会上说,环顾七年来的RCEP谈判,包括全球经贸形势都在变化,这些变化是不能忽视的。他认为RCEP协定并未充分体现它的初衷,这种情况下印度不会加入。 根据法新社报导,印度对外事务部东亚区高级外交官维杰塔库星(Vijay Thakur Singh)对记者说:“我们已经向与会国传达了我们将不加入RCEP的决定。” 第三次区域全面经济伙伴协定(RCEP)领导人会议本月4日在曼谷举行。不过参与谈判的各国领导人仍表示大门仍为印度而开。 参与RCEP协定的15国包括东盟10国,另加中国、韩国、日本、澳洲和纽西兰。这项协定涵盖全球一半人口和30巴仙的全球生产总值(GDP)。 据分析,印度可能担忧RCEP将对该国制造业造成冲击,特别是中国廉价商品涌入;该国希望RCEP自贸程度低一些,给该国更多照顾。 要开放印度市场  相应领域也要对印度开放 印度总理莫迪本月2日,接受《曼谷邮报》采访时称,他仍致力于推动RCEP谈判,不过强调若要印度开放庞大市场,相应领域也要对印度开放,让印度商家从中受惠。 他指出印度很清楚,互利的RCEP较符合其国家以及所有伙伴利益。…

93万户组屋将获 60元至100元水电费回扣

约93万户组屋即将在本月获得60元至100元的水电费回扣,以抵消他们部分的水电费。 水电费回扣,属于消费税补助券之一,每个三月发放一次,以此协助家庭抵消部分水电费,降低开支。 文告表示,将根据不同房型,获得不同价格的回扣,如一房式或两房式单位将获得100元水电费补助、三房式则会有90元补助,四房式则是80元,五房式则有70元,三代同堂或其他大型组屋则享有60元回扣。 若其房地产超过一个将无法享有水电费回扣。 日前,新加坡能源公司宣布,家庭电价将上调至3.5巴仙,即每千瓦0.81元。 举例而言,住在一房式的家庭,每月平均账单可增加1.02元,而五房式也可能会出现上涨3.20元的电费,形成最新电价自2014年以来,达到最高水平。 此外,城市煤气周一也宣布,今年第一季度,家庭天然气价格将调整至4.22巴仙,即每千瓦0.76元。 政府也推出水电费回扣(U-Save)协助民众抵消水电费。据报道,政府为水电费回扣拨出的总开支,今年预计达3亿元。 文告也指出,水电费回扣相当重要,至少能够帮助一房式或二房式单位的居民抵消平均三至四个月的水电费;而三房式和四房式的居民则可以抵消一至两个月的水电费。

NTU to provide free COVID-19 testing for all hall residents to ensure campus remains safe

In a move to ensure the campus stays safe, Nanyang Technological University…

Netizens displeased with DPM Heng’s statement that GST would be up to 15% if not for Singapore’s healthy reserves

While speaking at the Building our Future of Singapore Together dialogue at…