by Imran Andrew Price

Jonathan Eyal sounded almost as if he was a died in the wool neo-conservative warning about the “awful and the dreadful” choices in dealing with the possibility of Iran obtaining nuclear weapons (“The bets on a per-emptive strike on Iran” ST 4/12/2010). His dire warnings and scary rhetoric were virtually the same as those used by the pro-Israel neocons in the march to war that occurred in the international media in the lead-up to the disaster of the invasion of Iraq in 2003. Of course, he completely avoids any mention of that conflict or the lessons learnt from it in his article.

It is quite incredible that he seriously advocates a recipe for endless war in the Middle East as the best means of securing Israel’s sense of security. He simply dismisses the possibility of using diplomacy to solve this issue (“But the chances of this working are almost nil”) without any shred of evidence for this.

The US Defense Secretary, Robert Gates has argued that a “successful” attack on Iran’s facilities would delay the Iranians by at most a few years. Such an attack would in fact, spur the Iranian regime with much greater incentive to obtain nuclear weapons.

At this time, it is not even clear that Iran has made a definitive decision to build nuclear weapons. It has been developing its nuclear capability for many decades but the US 2007 US National Intelligence Estimate concluded that Iran had “no active nuclear weapons program”. It has not been rescinded since then.

Eyal does not mention why the prospect of Iran at some stage in the future obtaining such weapons is such a dreadful threat. Certainly, the Israelis believe that such a threat would be unacceptable. But can the terrible loss of life that would ensue from a “pre-emptive” attack on Iran and its aftermath in endless war in the Middle East ever justify such an action?

He talks about the likely response of Iran and other “Islamic” countries but he assiduously ignores the very real danger that such an attack would lead to a huge explosion in terrorist violence all around the world not just in the Middle East.

Stephen M. Walt from Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government and others like him have proposed that rather repeating the disaster of the Iraq war on an even grander scale, the US should negotiate a “grand bargain” with Iran that accepts their enrichment programme on the “strict condition that it ratifies and implements all elements of the NPT Additional Protocol.”

He also goes on to warn about how the “pro-war” party in the US used the tragedy of 9/11 to drag the US into the conflict in Iraq by adopting “hawkish rhetoric and tortured rationales in order to show how serious they were”. Even “former doves jumped on the bandwagon and the centre of gravity swung inexorably to the hard line position and the results were disastrous”.

Jonathan Eyal seems to be pushing that same bandwagon as far right as he possible can. Hopefully, friends of the United States in Asia will realize the dangers in this approach and make sure that an even bigger disaster does not happen this time around.

Imran is a member of the Centre for Contemporary Islamic Studies in Singapore and actively opposed the invasion of Iraq in 2003.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Washington Post journalist slams K Shanmugam for alleging “one-sided portrayal” of HK protests by international media

Singapore’s Minister of Law and Home Affairs K Shanmugam is “really helping”…

失望要求撤回更正指示遭驳回 民主党考虑再上诉

人力部援引《防假消息法》,对民主党的贴文发出更正指示。后者在上月上诉高庭,不过高庭已裁决驳回民主党要求撤回指示的申请。 民主党今日(5日)也在脸书发文表示,对于高庭的裁决“感失望”,也表示打算针对裁决上诉。 该党重申在此前申诉时提出的论点 :《防假消息法》仅适用于明确的虚假消息,但不应针对对于统计数据的诠释差异。 “我们注意到,法官提及法院在此事扮演的作用是诠释法律,故此法院作为收到法律强制性的约束。” “不过法官也曾指出,有别于可依靠国家机制,来证明消息真伪的部长,一般发表论述者则往往资源有限。” 民主党申诉失利,也意味着这是本地首宗在《防假消息法》下,更正指示申诉者被驳回的案例。 人力部是在去年12月14日,针对民主党的脸书贴文和文章,发出要求更正指示。人力部反驳,本地PMET的就业率自2015年实则逐步增长;且并没有出现本地PMET裁员增加的趋势。 民主党在上月3日向人力部长杨莉明申请,撤回上述更正指示,不过该部在6日驳回。对此民主党只得上诉高庭,在上月16日聆讯。该党选择自行辩护,宁可把支持者们的善款用在筹备来届选举。

Could PM Lee’s comparison of Israel’s election during a pandemic be the best example?

While speaking to reporters at the Istana on Friday (27 March), Prime…