[TOC thanks the UK High Commission for sending us this article for publication. It is written by the British Minister of State at the Foreign and Commonwealth Office, Mr Jeremy Browne.]

On this, the seventh World Day Against the Death Penalty, it is grimly disturbing that we are continuing to see such widespread use of the death penalty across the world.  Amnesty report that in 2009, 18 countries carried out executions, with a total of 714 people executed during the year, and this does not even include figures from China, where these remain a state secret. The majority of the world’s executions take place in China, so the actual figure is likely to be in the thousands.

Some of the crimes committed by people who have been sentenced to death are appalling.   Why then does the British Government remain absolutely opposed to the death penalty in all circumstances, no matter what the crime?

The answer to my mind is clear.

First, there is no evidence to suggest that a person who commits a crime which carries a life sentence in prison would have acted any differently if he or she had known that their crime could have resulted in their execution.

Second, any miscarriage of justice leading to the imposition of the death penalty is irreversible and irreparable. It is difficult to forget the case of Derek Bentley, executed in 1953 when he was only 19 years old and eventually cleared 45 years later.

Third, if the state has the authority to execute its own citizens as a criminal penalty, the balance between the rights of the individual and the power of government is fundamentally altered.

Finally, the existence of the death penalty undermines human dignity and has no place in the 21st century. Abolishing the death penalty is a vital step towards the development of full and universal human rights.

There is now clear international momentum towards global abolition.  In the past 10 years alone, 22 countries have abolished the death penalty.  But global abolition is still many years away, and considerable challenges remain before we can live in a fully abolitionist world.  Only 58 countries retain the death penalty. But that is still 58 too many.

On Monday 11th October the British Government will launch its new strategy for global abolition of the death penalty.  We will direct our work at the most prolific users and in those places where we can make a real difference.

This may sometimes require a pragmatic approach with some countries.  For example, encouraging states to formally establish moratoriums on the use of the death penalty.  And we call on those countries that continue to rely on the death penalty, to ensure that international minimum standards are adhered to, including never executing juveniles, pregnant women or persons who have become insane, and ensuring rights to a fair trial and to appeal.

Our international project work is also yielding results.  The Foreign Office funds projects to bring legal challenges to the constitutionality of the imposition and the application of the death penalty.  We have recently supported successful challenges in Kenya, Barbados and Uganda among others.

Removal of the mandatory death penalty can significantly reduce the number of prisoners who are sentenced to death.  Just last month, 167 prisoners on death row in Uganda had their sentences commuted to life imprisonment as a result of an FCO funded project and last year Kenya commuted the death sentences of its entire death row of 4000 prisoners.  These are steps in the right direction.

But we cannot stop there.  The abolition of the death penalty will not happen overnight and there is much hard work ahead.  The UK remains firmly committed to taking action on its own and together with our international partners in order to achieve our ultimate aim of global abolition.

—————

About the author: Jeremy Browne was appointed Minister of State at the Foreign and Commonwealth Office on 14 May 2010. He has been the Member of Parliament for Taunton Deane since May 2005.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Human Rights in everyday life

Siew Kum Hong illustrates why human rights is applicable to everyday life in S’pore.

Attempts to smuggle 1,080 e-vaporiser refill pods and 10 e-vaporiser modules foiled by ICA

A total of 1,080 e-vaporiser refill pods and 10 e-vaporiser modules were…

似乎不了解禁令仅限电动滑板车 妇女推车徒步缓行网民心酸

前日,国会正式颁布禁令,不准电动滑板车在人行道上行驶,惟脚车和电动轮椅等代步工具(Personal Mobility Aids),仍可在人行道、脚车道和公园连道使用。 不过有网民发现,一位行动不便的妇女,可能是对禁令不甚了解,而在行人道上慢慢地推着行动辅助器、一拐一拐地行走,令见者都不免心酸。 一名网友于昨日(11月5日)下午5时许,在Helloあsia Singapore脸书群组上传了一段,只有短短六秒的视频。   视频拍摄者相信是乘坐着行驶中的车子,只见一名很穿暗色系的穆斯林妇女手推着一辆三轮的行动辅助器,在人行道上缓慢前行,行动非常不方便。 上载者也在视频中写道,“看了都让人心酸”。 这视频在15个小时内就获得七万人观看,2500人转发,以及305个留言。 呼吁撤下有关视频 有网民感叹禁令实施的不合时宜,“害惨了阿姨这群体的人士”。…

“脱口罩才说话!” 侮辱商场职员、涉袭警 妇女被捕

妇女拒绝戴口罩,还与商场工作人员起争执,以及涉嫌袭警,有关妇女已被捕并在今日(9日)被控上庭。 本月7日,一名妇女因戴口罩问题,在三巴旺太阳广场(Sun Plaza)与工作人员起争执。她声称工作人员戴上口罩说话,她听不清楚,要求对方脱下口罩才说话。 尽管工作人员多次劝诫,对方仍不配合;后来警员接到投报到场,警方要求妇女拿出身份证,对方仍不肯合作,还将身份证上的地址标签撕掉。 另一名警察试图阻止却遭袭击。该名妇女因涉嫌蓄意伤害执勤公务员,可能触犯刑事法典第332节条文。一旦罪成可面对最高七年监禁、罚款或鞭刑。 此外,防止骚然法令下,使用侮辱性语言骚扰他人,可判处最高半年监禁、5千元罚款或两者兼施。 至于拒绝戴口罩,警方则在冠状病毒疾病(临时措施)法令下调查妇女。