Breaking News:
Bernard Madoff, who was charged with defrauding thousands of investors in the US of some US$65 billion, has been handed a 150-year jail term. (BBC
)

Billboards and banners at various parts of S’pore last year

Andrew Loh

It is that time of year again, as National Day approaches, when our Members of Parliament show their patriotism. To do so, billboards and bannerettes are springing up all over the island, as they did in previous years. They are huge, colourful and according to some, an eyesore. Also, they cost quite a bit of money.

In a time of Singapore’s worse recession in its history, where thousands are out of job and struggling to survive, one would have to question if such ostentatious show of patriotism is necessary.

In a Straits Times report on 29 June 2009, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong said that “low-income families approaching the CDCs have increased by about 40 per cent” and, in another report on the same day, the Finance Ministry revealed that “more than 780,000 HDB households will receive $60 million of utility rebates in July.”

Clearly, Singaporeans are finding it tough to cope with living costs.

It was not too long ago that PAP-run town councils were found to have invested in toxic financial products and had lost S$16 million in the process. In a bid to dismiss the losses as small or insignificant, the government revealed that the PAP-run town councils have accumulated, over the last 20 years, S$2 billion worth of reserves in their sinking funds. (Channel NewsAsia)

This writer wrote to the Ang Mo Kio – Yio Chu Kang Town Council last year to ask about the cost of the billboards and the bannerettes. The reply from the town council was that “the total cost of each billboard is $3,300”. The town council said it paid for one billboard “per division/SMC and the rest are borne by the respective CCC through their own fund raising.” The cost of electricity for the spotlights which lights up the boards at night costs S$100 (for two months) for each billboard. The town council had put up 7 billboards in the AMK-YCK constituency but said that “for the rest, we leave it to the CCCs to install at their own costs.” It had also installed 1,336 bannerettes in the area.

While we may understand that MPs would like to celebrate National Day and show their patriotism and solidarity with the nation, we should also question if such spending is necessary, especially in these uncertain times.

In Aljunied GRC constituency, the town council has even introduced electronic LCD screens on its notice boards at the void decks. (See picture, below). Is this necessary?

LCD at an Aljunied void deck notice board

Would it not be more prudent and helpful for the town councils to use the funds spent on these billboards to help families which are struggling with utilities bills and service and conservancy charges instead?

In an interview with the Straits Times two days ago, on 27 June 2009, Senior Minister Goh Chok Tong lamented that residents still do not feel they have a stake in the governance of their estates and that there was a “missing link” in the relationship between the town councils and residents. Indeed, his fellow PAP member, Mr Lim Boon Heng, felt that “we have not yet imbued the sense of personal and collective responsibility in the residents.” (Straits Times)

One would, instead, question the sense of responsibility of the town councils in how they are spending funds collected from residents.

Finally, commenting on the town councils’ investments in December last year, Minister of Health, Mr Khaw Boon Wan also defended the town councils from accusations of being non-transparent in how they spent their funds.  “It’s absolutely transparent,” he said, “because this is not a secret society activity where there is secrecy and so on.” (AsiaOne)

The Online Citizen would thus like to encourage our readers and all Singaporeans to write to their respective MPs and ask about the costs of putting up the billboards and bannerettes (and for Aljunied residents, the cost and necessity of the LCDs).

Also, we welcome our readers to take pictures of these and send them to us at [email protected] and the replies they may receive from their town councils.

—-

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

PM Lee: POFMA would catch you if you spread fake news about CPF withdrawal ages on social media

At the National Day Rally 2019 yesterday (18 Aug), Prime Minister Lee…

Nets apologises for hurt caused by controversial E-Pay advertisement; netizens fume in anger

After days of non-stop issues revolving the ‘brownface’ advertisement for E-Pay, financial…

幸运商业中心发生恐怖车祸,休旅车失控冲撞2死4伤

幸运商业中心昨日下午发生恐怖车祸,一辆黑色轿车因失控撞入公寓停靠处的防撞杆,再冲入人行道,撞倒聚集在那里的几名女佣。休旅车在撞人后并未停下,而是再撞坏栏杆,与4人一起跌落至下方停车场出口处 ,造成2死4伤。 据警方与民防部队表示,意外发生地点位于乌节路幸运商业中心公寓旁的纳麦路(Nutmeg Road)当时他们在下午5点左右接获通报,并派出五辆救护车。   6名严重伤者在现场,年龄介于37岁至56岁之间,其中41岁与50岁伤者在车祸现场已昏迷不醒,立即送往陈笃生医院进行抢救,但仍伤重不治。 而目前64岁肇祸司机涉嫌危险驾驶导致死亡而被捕,案件正在侦办中。 据悉,6名伤者皆为菲律宾籍女佣,菲律宾外交部表示正在与我国大使馆核实意外的最新信息,并将为受害者提供一切援助。 菲律宾驻新大使馆表示,目前仍有两名伤者正在重症监护病房里,而另外两名伤者情况稳定。至于两名不幸的死者则正计划将其遗体运回菲律宾。 意外视频与照片疯传,家庭佣工中心吁尊重死者与家属 意外发生之际也被许多路人拍摄下来,可以从不同的视频与照片中发现,黑色休旅车是停靠在幸运商业中心的一条小路上,而且旁边躺着两个人,救护人员也为他们进行急救。 这些视频与照片也开始在网络上疯传。…

NTUC Fairprice sets purchase limit for essential goods; netizens ask for more stricter measures

Following the announcement of Malaysia’s movement restriction order which started on Wednesday…