From the Jakarta Post:

The family of David Hartanto Widjaja, an Indonesian student who died at Singapore’s Nanyang Technological University (NTU) on March 2, and a local verification team doubt the Singaporean court process of his death.

The coroner court under the subordinate court in Singapore has been processing the case to decide whether David’s death was a suicide. If it not, then the case will be forwarded to the criminal court.

However, it appeared the court process was intentionally directed to a conclusion of suicide despite evidence showing a strong possibility of murder, according to David’s family and the verification team.

“We have strong evidence that he was murdered but that fact was not brought up in the court,” David’s father, Hartono Wijaya, told a press conference Tuesday at the National Commission on Human Rights.

“Testimonies from witnesses presented by the NTU were fictitious and none of our witnesses was brought to the court.”

Djaja Surya Atmadja, a forensic expert from the Faculty of Medicine in the University of Indonesia, said any forensic doctor could see from the forensic report that David’s body had defense wounds, and that there were no wounds of suicide.

Djaya and another forensic doctor, Evi Untoro, analyzed the case based on the forensic report. Using a mannequin, they visually demonstrated the locations and forms of wounds that David had…

Click here to read more.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

被裁员职业类别中占比仍高 PMET成劳动市场新弱势群体?

根据人力部最新的劳动力报告,尽管被裁退人数有所下降,但专业人士、经理、执行员与技师(professionals, managers, executives and technicians,简称PMET)却占了被裁员人数中的大部分,从1440人增至1680人。 该报告揭露,被裁退人数由第一季度的3230人,下跌至第二季度的2320人。 但大部分被裁退人数为PMET人士,一半以上的被裁退员工握有大专文凭,而且七成的人已年过40岁。 2019年上半年PMET被裁员总数,多达3120人。而根据今年4月人力部长杨莉明在国会答复,在2018年,有5400位本地PMET被裁员。 星展银行经济学家谢光威(Irvin Seah),接受《雅虎新闻》采访时曾表示,PMET领域裁员人数比其他劳动力更高。2018年数据显示,PMET的劳动力占了57巴仙。对此,谢光威将PMET视为”新弱势群体“,并指出尽管PMET属于专业技能,并获得相当优秀的资格,但其人力淘汰率在过去九年中一直持续上升。 此外,说到重新进入劳动力,谢光威也表示PMET的表现“持续低下”,根据数据显示,PMET人士在被裁员后半年,重新进入职场的仅达57.8巴仙。其中之因素为薪资的落差,谢光威指出,因为PMET属于白领阶级的专业人士,通常的薪资要求会更高,以支持他们的生活,但显然已产生变化。 被裁银行职员 …

Three additional cases of Covid-19 infection in Singapore; two new clusters identified

The Ministry of Health (MOH) announced on Wednesday (12 Feb) evening that…

Hong Kong netizens offended by Chan Chun Sing’s “disgraceful” remarks, saying Singapore do not understand Hong Kong’s actual situation

The leaked audio recording of Minister Chan Chun Sing’s remark over the…

李显扬:显龙对遗嘱有疑问 应以公民身份投诉

李显扬再度发文抨击,指总检察署仍未回答他的提问,为何要为私人事务浪费公共资源?如果总理李显龙对父亲的遗嘱有疑问,理应以私人公民身份提出投诉。 他非议总理假借总检察署,向律师公会提呈其妻子林学芬,指林学芬在为李光耀准备遗嘱一事失职。 李显扬在个人脸书发文写道:“总检察署为何种公共利益服务?事情过了那么久,为何要为私人事务浪费公共资源?其中有许多都是各方已知的事实,但为何选择在2019年仓促重提此案?” “然而,总检察署没有回答这些疑问。反之,当具体到曾向律师公会投诉过五项个案–却没有任何一单是过了五年的旧事,也不涉及四人遗嘱。” 他指出,在各方都有法律代表的情况下,总检察署插手有关私人遗嘱事项,是前所未有的。 “如果显龙对父亲的遗嘱有疑问,理应以私人公民身份提出投诉。” 总理李显龙妹妹李玮玲医生,于本月6日10时42分,在个人脸书揭露总检察署向新加坡律师公会提呈逾500页的投诉信。总检察署在答复媒体询问时指出,李显扬妻子林学芬作为专业律师,在为李光耀准备遗嘱一事,有失职之嫌的表面证据,表面触犯法律专业(专业行为规章)第25节条文和第46节条文。 当局认为,林学芬在李光耀最后一份遗嘱,以李显扬作为受益人的情况下准备遗嘱,并安排李光耀执行,而李显扬获得的份额有增加。 对此,李显扬在本月7日发文回应,其妻子从未担任李光耀的律师,父亲的遗嘱在五年前就已执行。当父亲完成遗嘱后,告知全家和他的律师,遗嘱由李&李律师事务所保管。 他说,没有人在父亲签定最终遗嘱的过程提出投诉—包括父亲自身、任何受益人、以及咨询黄鲁胜(现任总检察长)的李显龙。 他反驳总检察署称妻子林学芬拒绝回应是不实的,并呼吁总检察署公开完整往来信件。 曾担任李显龙私人秘书的总检察长黄鲁胜回避处理林学芬可能专业行为失当一事,事件改由副总检察长余文正负责。…