Breaking News: Singapore confirms first case of H1N1, Influenza A. She is a 22-year old woman. She was in New York from May 14 to 24. She arrived in Singapore on 26 May and her GP sent her to the hospital on the same day.

Gerald Giam / Senior Writer

I strongly reject PAP MP Hri Kumar’s suggestion in Parliament that the Prime Minister should be given the option to appoint individuals from outside the rank of elected MPs to his cabinet. He had argued that the pool of talent available to the PM will “increase substantially” and he can draw on the experience of many “capable individuals”.

This is a dangerous line of thinking which is not just undemocratic, but foolish as well.

What Mr Kumar is asking for is to insulate ministers from the rough and tumble of elections, so that there is no need for them to shake the hands of “commoners” and appeal for their support at the polls. He is saying that a cabinet minister should not need to be directly accountable to the voters, so as to free him up to make decisions however he deems fit, with little regard for the views of the people. He is saying that the definition of a “capable individual” does not necessarily include having the ability and EQ to relate with those less intelligent or successful than himself.

Most glaringly, Mr Kumar is saying that what we need are technocratic managers, not politicians, to lead our country.

This reflects the view of the right wing of the PAP, but if accepted, will take our already struggling democracy down a path that many will live to regret.

Singapore will be worse off if we are led only by scholar-technocrats without the common touch. We need ministers who can emphathise with ordinary Singaporeans. Who see themselves as ordinary Singaporeans who had extraordinary opportunities.

I am not saying that it is impossible for an unelected official to have the common touch. But if we open the doors to this segment of society to lead us politically, we will be fishing from the wrong pond. We will, in the long run, attract the wrong sort of people to lead our country — people with a different set of values and motivations. Our country will then really turn into an “administrative state”.

In any case, it’s not as if we aren’t already led by technocratic managers, given that many of our scholar-ministers have never had to face an election fight to get into office. Many of those that did were shielded by heavyweight ministers in GRCs. Mr Kumar himself entered Parliament without a fight.

We need more inspirational leaders, not corporate managers. The cabinet should not be an extension of the Civil Service or the corporate boardroom.

I don’t know why the PAP hasn’t figured out why it is so hard to convince intelligent and principled men and women to join the party. Surely having a chequered history of jailing and abusing well-meaning social activists should not be that big a barrier to joining the party? Or is it?

Some may argue that this is the system in the US and it seems to have worked there. There is a big difference between the US system and the Westminster system: The US President is directly voted in (for all intents and purposes) by the people, whereas in Singapore the Prime Minister is simply the MP who has the most support in Parliament. In the US, cabinet members are an extension of the President, who is accountable to voters for their successes and failures.

All said, having a US-style cabinet without a US-style presidency will erode our democracy.

—–

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

The national flag, to hang or not to hang

By Terry Xu TRE posted an article earlier about what a reader…

Major fund managers incur pay cut last year due to poor results but unknown for GIC & Temasek

Major funds in the world are slashing their CEO’s pay in view…

“不可能拿纳税人钱补投资者损失” 环境部挺公用局决定

因不满凯发债务重组计划,以及公用事业局将以零元收购大泉海水淡化厂,凯发永久证券和优先股投资者,有意在本周六在芳林公园进行抗议。 一些投资者认为,公用局打算接管淡水厂的决定是“无情的”,令投资者们感到难以接受,因为他们的投资都被用在这个水电厂的建设。他们希望公用局能“出于善意和道德责任”,补偿这些永久证券和优先股投资者。 对于投资者的诉求,本地网媒“Mothership”致函质询新加坡环境与水源部,惟后者指出任何投资都有风险,公用局不可能动用纳税人的钱,来补偿投资者对损失。 “任何生意都不能免除违约责任” 该部在答复中指出,任何生意都可能面对财务压力,也无法幸免于违约责任。“公用局无法用纳税人的钱,来抵消掉投资者面对的损失。” 该部解释,当初凯发的确符合公用局的需求,在竞标者中最具竞争力,才获得建造海水淡化厂的招标工程。凯发还要求把淡水厂和发电厂整合起来。 在官民合作的工程,公用局虽不会干涉有关公司企业决策,但也会监督企业是否有能力继续按照合约履行职责。 早前,公用局声明凯发“白武士”SM投资(SMI),不应以公用局的违约通知为由,退出重组凯发的协议。环境与水源部也支持公用局的声明,若公用局终止和凯发的购水合约,反而对凯发有利。 环境部:公用局首要任务是保障国家水资源 凯发此前认为公用局的举动,能减轻凯发集团面对的压力,对该公司市值能起正面影响,也增加凯发成功重组的几率。 环境与水源部也重申,公用局的首要目的,是保障新加坡的水资源。而公用局的举措也符合这个目的。 公用局早前指出,大泉水电厂无法履行购水协议下的多项合约义务,尤其未能按照需求让水电厂继续可靠运作。…

Netizens express concerns after four new COVID-19 community cases test ‘preliminary positive’ for double mutant from India

On Sunday (9 May), Singapore recorded 10 new community cases of COVID-19,…