Announcement: The Online Citizen will bring you “live” updates from Suntec City tomorrow (Saturday) of the AWARE Extraordinary General Meeting. “Live” updates will begin from 12 noon. Stay tuned to TOC!

By Avery Chong, Gerald Giam, Nathaniel Koh, Watson Chong and Yaw Shin Leong

Singaporean workers are facing their most challenging period since Independence. Thousands have lost their jobs since the current economic crisis began last year, and unemployment is expected to continue rising through 2009 and beyond. Many workers have been forced to accept salary cuts or go on unpaid leave to help their companies stay profitable.

These workers should be saluted for their resilience, perseverance and adaptability in the face of enormous challenges. Singapore‘s prosperity and economic progress were achieved primarily through the sweat of our workers.

The Government always claims credit for Singapore‘s economic growth during good times, yet conveniently blames the global downturn when our economy takes a nosedive. However the facts tell a different story. Singapore was the first country in Asia to slip into recession last year. Our GDP is expected to contract 8.8% this year — much worse than almost all our major trading partners (see Annex A for the economic forecasts for our top trading partners).

The Government’s economic model may no longer be serving us well, and we need to start a national conversation to discuss alternative economic models to take Singapore to the next level of progress.

Closing the income gap

Singapore‘s economic growth over the last decade has resulted in phenomenal income increases for PAP ministers, “foreign talents” and top company executives, while the incomes of low wage Singaporean workers have stagnated or even fallen. Singapore‘s income inequality is now more in line with Third World countries than with other developed economies like Japan and Denmark.

Economic growth should benefit all Singaporeans, not just the rich and well-connected. While there should be fair rewards for hard work and good performance, the reality is that many ordinary Singaporeans work just as hard, if not harder, than their wealthy counterparts, but have not reaped commensurate rewards.

The Government should implement measures to increase the take home pay of low-wage local workers. This can be achieved through tighter restrictions on the import of foreign labour in domestic industries, skills development for higher value-added industries, productivity increases through capital investments and increasing government-funded income supplements.

The Goods and Services Tax (GST) for basic necessities like rice and sugar should be removed to benefit low-income Singaporeans. The GST should be reverted to its previous rate of 5% for all other goods and services, except luxury items.

While a no strings attached welfare state is undesirable, there is room for limited and conditional financial assistance for the unemployed. This financial assistance could be based on a fixed quantum or a proportion of the job seeker’s last drawn salary. It should not be disbursed solely at the discretion of Citizen’s Consultative Committees or Community Development Councils. It should be given for a limited period (e.g., six months) to all retrenched Singaporeans who demonstrate a commitment to looking for a new job.

Finally, wealthy Singaporeans should do their part to help their less fortunate countrymen through increased contributions to social welfare organisations and foundations that help Singaporeans in need.

We wish all our fellow Singaporean workers a Happy Labour Day!

——–
[1] The Economist Country Briefings (17 April 2009).

[2] Caught in the pay squeeze, Straits Times, 8 Jun 2008; MOM Report on Wages in Singapore 2006, p45.

[3] Singapore‘s Gini index is 42.5, similar to Thailand (42.0) and Cambodia (41.7). Gini index for Japan (24.9) and Denmark (24.7) are much better than Singapore’s. There are no developed countries that have a worse Gini index than Singapore (UNDP 2007/2008 Human Development Report).

——–

Annexe A

2009 GDP Growth Forecasts for Singapore’s top trading partners

 

 

Trading partner rank

Country/Region

Real GDP growth forecast (2009)

2

China

+6.0%

10

India

+5.0%

11

Australia

-1.2%

4

Indonesia

-1.9%

1

Malaysia

-3.0%

3

United States

-3.2%

13

United Kingdom

-3.8%

9

Thailand

-4.4%

12

Germany

-5.3%

6

Hong Kong

-5.9%

5

Japan

-6.4%

Singapore

-8.8%

7

Taiwan

-9.3%

8

South Korea

-10.1%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Source: IE Singapore and Economist Intelligence Unit

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Goh Jin Hian resigns from board of Swiss-based crypto bank Seba amid lawsuit by IPP’s judicial managers

Dr Goh Jin Hian has left the board of Swiss-based crypto bank…

Singapore and Malaysia agree to revert to original port limits

Governments of Malaysia and Singapore have agreed to revert to their original…

Huawei apologises for ending S$54 promotion early after phones are sold out

On Wednesday (24 July), Huawei announced that it will be selling its…

火葬场收红包事件:网友认为应分清意图,将红包平均分摊

网友Simon Lim: 我想指出上周有关“收受红包的火葬场工作人员,被严厉警告的事件作出评论,以下皆为我个人评论。 我国贪污调查,一向以对贪污“零容忍”原则获得美誉并闻名世界。对我们而言,贪污调查局确实恪尽职守,而他们也值得任何的赞扬与鼓励。不过,我亦希望他们能在执法时融入更多的人性与弹性。我想要强调的是,弹性并不代表与贪污妥协。 对大部分家庭而言,每当有家庭成员离开,本就会经历悲伤与痛苦。我记得当我的家庭成员离世时,我的家人与亲戚都经历了紧张、痛苦等高度的情绪消耗。我也相信这也会发生在其他的家庭中。 当葬礼结束后,家属想为一路陪同的、尽责的工作人员送上万分的感谢,所以很自然地选择赠送“红包”给低收入的火葬场员工,向他们表达内心的感恩与感谢。 我想要明确指出,任何欲向家属要求、或暗示红包之行为是绝对不能接受的,但禁止低收入的火葬场工作人员接受来自家属自愿性的“红包”也相当不可取。毕竟他们从事常人忌讳的工作,但仍专业地提供相当有效的服务,同时也兼顾那些家属的需求。 因此,我建议任何来自家属自愿性的“红包”应与每月月底平分,由火葬场工作人员平均获得。这样以来,家属的善意与感激之情在不被剥夺下,又不违反法律,同时亦能激励低收入火葬场工作人员的动力,同理家属的失去并提供更有品质的服务,成为双赢的关键。 我希望相关当局不仅仅是成为冷冰冰的机器,缺乏考虑人性与深度理解生命的意义。三思而后行! 出自网友Simon Lim,原文请看