From Asia Sentinel

The bull market tide goes out, leaving the lion city’s sovereign wealth firm gasping on the shore.

Nearly five months after its March 31 year-end, Singaporeans should be eagerly looking forward to the publication of the report of the guardian of so much of the national wealth, Temasek Holdings. The sovereign wealth fund run by Ho Ching, wife of Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong, is not the biggest repository of money collected by the state on behalf of the people, but it is at least semi-transparent compared with its big brother the Government Investment Corp.

The lengthy wait for results could possibly be connected to issues of how to treat a series of rather spectacular disasters that Temasek faced last year, and that are continuing into the current year.

Even in 2006-07, when world markets were booming in unison, Temasek had to report a 29 percent profit fall. Neither chairman S. Dhanabalan nor Ho Ching were on hand at the press conference when these dismal results were delivered. So who will deliver any bad news for the latest year?

Of course, the bottom line for the year to March 2008 may be saved by the sale just before year-end of power station Tuas Power to China’s Huaneng Group for S$4.2 billion which should enable it to book a hefty capital profit. But selling local assets and buying foreign ones may not be such a smart idea, particularly if you are the kind of Singapore bureaucrat who has implicit faith in the masters of the universe on Wall Street.

Under Ho Ching’s leadership Temasek had supposedly been taken from being a safety-first bureaucracy to a smart, profit-oriented outfit, selling some assets and investing heavily overseas, particularly in the fast-growing emerging markets of Asia and Latin America. Almost fool can make money in a global bull market so for awhile Temasek seemed to prosper under Ho Ching’s dynamic leadership. But Temasek also swallowed plenty of bait on offer from Wall Street types.

In particular the government-owned investment vehicle vastly expanded its finance sector portfolio, buying banks and even setting up a Special Purpose Vehicle, Astrea, which borrowed US$810 million to invest in a slew of private equity and buyout funds.

It is hard to imagine that Astrea has avoided the hammering suffered by almost all buyout and private equity funds, some of which have had to close with large losses.

But Temasek seems to have compounded bull market errors by continuing to have faith in Wall Street deceptions when memory of the Asian crisis and the Japanese experience should have made it particularly aware that financial-sector problems almost always go deeper and last longer than those in other sectors. Temasek was keen to show how important it was so was among the first to jump in with equity bail-outs for distressed western banks, firstly with US$5 billion for Merrill Lynch at $48 a share.

The Merill shares are now worth about half that, and although under the terms of the deal Temasek has been partially compensated with additional shares it has had to also to put in new money – and must wonder just how long and deep the US financial crisis will be. Although it had recently increased its stake in the UK’s Standard Chartered, it also put ₤1 billion into Britain’s Barclays, a financial institution whose equity base remains perilously small compared with the weight of assorted instruments it carries and whose share price has fallen much further since the Temasek injection.

But it is not just the finance sector and in the west that gung-Ho Temasek has hit rough waters. The Shin Corp mess in Thailand may now be a thing of the past. But troubles elsewhere are many. In Indonesia it is being required to sell off its stake in Bank International Indonesia (BII) because it already owns Bank Danamon. But Malaysia’s Bank Negara (central bank) has vetoed an attempt by Maybank to buy the BII stake. Bank Negara evidently agreed with opinion in the market that Maybank was offering a silly price.

The best piece of luck Temasek has had was actually evidence of its own willingness to pay top dollar. Only the myopic greed of shareholders in China Eastern Airlines and hopes of a counter offer from China National Aviation Corp thwarted a generous joint offer by Temasek and Singapore Airlines for a 24 percent stake in the Hong Kong-listed company at HK$3.8 a share. They now trade at HK$1.80.

Real estate is not looking too hot either. Last month CapitalLand (part of the Temasek group) had to promise to inject A$300 million into its ailing listed Australian 54 percent owned subsidiary Australand Property. Without a huge capital injection, deeply indebted Australand might have gone under.

Temasek has also leaped heavily into one of China’s highest profile, and perhaps more vulnerable, property developers, Country Garden. When it went public in Hong Kong in April 2007, Country Garden was the second largest IPO in Hong Kong history, with Temasek joining local tycoons Lee Shau Kee and Robert Kuok as key investors. According to the mainland financial magazine Caijing, a subsequent S$800 million convertible bond issue in Singapore in February this year was made on terms which suggest the company is very stretched and badly needs to keep its share price from falling. It is now little more than half its initial price and down 75 percent from its peak.

Australia, once seen as a safe if unexciting location for Singapore cash, has also attracted top of the market deals from Singapore Power. Already well-established in Australia, it paid heavily in cash for the eastern Australia assets of pipeline company Alinta but with values in decline they have been unable now to flip them into their 51 percent owned local subsidiary SP Ausnet leaving SP meanwhile saddled with huge borrowings.

Even on home ground, things are looking sick for important parts of the Temasek empire. Chartered Semiconductor Industries has seen its shares fall more than 40 percent and its debt ratings have been cut so that its bond are no longer investment grade – otherwise known as junk status. Chartered has long been a state effort to make Singapore a semiconductor manufacturing leader but has never managed to keep up with the likes of Taiwan and Korea in technology and now also faces Chinese competition.

These various problems have not entirely dulled Temasek’s appetite for acquisitions. Its associate Neptune Orient Lines (NOL) is bidding to buy Germany’s Hapag-Lloyd just at a time when some commentators forecast huge problems looming for container lines. This time Temasek may be saved by German nationalism – Hamburg business is ganging up to keep it in local hands.

It remains to be seen who, if anyone, takes responsibility for Temasek’s blunders. Last year it was chief investment officer Jimmy Phoon who found he had better things to do, as did Jackson Tai at DBS, Temasek’s main banking investment, and the finance director of SembCorp who had landed the group with US$300 million in foreign exchange losses.

Meanwhile US former food and consumer products executive Simon Israel, appointed two years ago, remains CEO in conjunction with Ho Ching. And, despite everything, faith in Wall Street types is as strong as ever – Michael Dee from Morgan Stanley was last week been appointed managing director for international investments.

—————–

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Fire at Block 138 Bedok Reservoir Road, man stood on ledge of bedroom

A man was standing on a ledge outside a bedroom of a 4th…

人流量和配合度仍是防疫关键 医疗专家分析去看戏、亲友聚会仍是高风险活动

政府声称冠状病毒19社区确诊病例有减少趋势,政府也表示会在下个月开始逐渐放宽阻断措施。 然而,人们有必要认清,即使放宽措施后,有些活动仍含有“高风险”的传染率,但是人数和人群配合度还是关键。 据《联合早报》所采访的数名传染病专家,包括伊丽莎白诺维娜医院传染科医生梁浩楠以及新加坡国立大学苏瑞福公共卫生学院副院长(研究)古阿烈副教授(Alex Cook)等,将各种活动依据传染风险区分,让民众了解以及避免举办或参与有关活动。 专家们认为10人以上的大型活动,如亲友聚会、电影院、健身房、酒吧和按摩院等皆属于“高风险”活动;到理发店、美甲店或在餐饮场所堂食属“中等风险”;而去超市、巴刹、购物商场或公园等则属于“低风险”活动。 然而专家们提醒,有关的风险级别区分是非常主观的,并非绝对标准。 鹰阁医药中心传染病专科医生黄乘佑指出,不能以相关的区别为标准,因若在风险低的场合出现任何举止行为出格的人,那么传染率的风险还是会随着提高;在挤满人潮的体育馆观看赛事属于高风险,但是若限制人数,确保安全距离,球员们也没有相互拥抱等近距离动作,风险也会随着降低。 他认为限制个别场所的人流,将能够控制染病风险,比如限制餐厅食客的逗留时间,健身房也要时常为器材消毒等。 梁浩楠医生则指出,人数多少以及是否保持安全距离,是冠毒传播的效率关键,因此除了物体表面的接触,一些社交行为如拥抱、唱歌和握手等行为也会增加传播风险。虽然有专家指去超市或湿巴刹、零售商店等属低风险活动,但是他认为这些场所的室内空气流通不良,病毒的存活率就会偏高,因此他认为这类场所的风险应该属中等级别。 古阿烈副教授对于逐步开放不同活动之举表示赞同,他指出,目前在冠状病毒传染方面的研究仍然不够充分,若能够量化每项活动的风险,自然就依据安排活动的恢复时段。 惟,他指出,放宽阻断措施,传染率也有可能会提高,若染病率增加了,我国或许需要再次推行病毒阻断措施。