Tan Kin Lian / Senior Writer

I wish to contribute my suggestions towards the development of a “Sustainable Singapore, Lively and Liveable City”. I believe that the quality of life for Singaporeans can be improved by reducing the need for commuting, and making the journey more comfortable. It will also reduce the use of energy and cost of living.

Reduce Commuting

Many people spend up to three hours a day in commuting to work and returning home. Commuting wastes valuable time, leads to congested buses and trains and roads, and uses oil and energy. It leads to a stressful and poor quality of life.

I wish to give the following suggestions to reduce the need for commuting. We have to encourage and make it practical for people to:

– Work from home

– Work near the home

– Move their homes to be closer to their workplace

Some of my proposed measures have been implemented in the past, with varying degrees of success. We need to focus on these strategies and find ways to get better results.

Work from Home

Many types of work can be done from home, such as data entry, telephone-based customer service and marketing, software development, design and other activities involving the use of the computer and Internet access. This trend will continue as more people accept the concept of pay for output, rather than time spent in the workplace.

It can be facilitated by the setting up of an Internet portal for businesses and contact workers to get connected in this type of work.

Work near the home

Businesses can be given incentives or encouraged to set up workplaces (i.e. offices and production facilities) in or near residential towns. They will be keener to adopt this measure if they have access to low-cost facilities and be assured of being able to recruit people living nearby.

We need a new effort to promote this idea and educate the businesses and workers on the advantage of working near the home.

Move their home

We need measures to encourage people to move their homes to be near their place of work. Some people may be willing to do so, if they are more confident that they intend to make a long term career in a company that is likely to remain located in a certain place.

At present, there is a strong disincentive for a person to move his home. It involves selling the existing home (i.e. flat or private property) and buying a new home. The stamp duty takes away 3% of the purchase price of the new property. Legal fees and other transaction costs can add another 2%. For a property worth $400,000, the transaction cost can add another $20,000.

I suggest that the stamp duty should be waived and that the legal and other costs can be reduced considerably through simplifying the process.

We should make it easier for people to rent their homes and to reduce the fiscal disincentive against renting (as compared to home ownership). I shall discuss this matter in more detail later.

Home Ownership

We have to re-think our approach towards home ownership, as a way for citizens to have a stake in Singapore. We provide fiscal incentives for home ownership through direct subsidies in the purchase of a HDB flat, a subsidised interest rate and reduced property tax.

A person who rents a property has to pay a higher rental as the owner does not enjoy the fiscal incentives. It is more costly to rent a property than to be an owner occupier. There is also an insufficient supply of homes for rental. This reduces the attractiveness of renting as an option.

The home ownership policy encourages people to buy their home and to stay there for many years. As they are likely to work in other parts of Singapore, they have to commute long distances.

We can still retain the concept of home ownership to give citizens a stake in Singapore. They can be encouraged to invest in property through a Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT), including a residential REIT. We could, for example, set up a REIT comprising of rented HDB flats.

This new arrangement will still promote home ownership to give citizens a stake in Singapore. The home ownership does not need to be tied into a specific property that they live in. This will encourage a workforce that is more ready to change their home to a new rented property, close to their place of work.

This new arrangement will also be suitable for younger Singaporeans who wish to work in the region and still have a stake in Singapore through their ownership in a residential REIT.

The fiscal incentives given to an owner-occupier of a home can be extended to a Singaporean citizen who invests in a REIT (in lieu of direct home ownership).

Not applicable to everyone

Some people have argued that the concept of moving the home close to the place of work does not suit certain families, as they have other family members who work in other places or attend school. Some have to live near their parents.

I agree that this concept will not work for these people. We only need to find (say) 30% of people who find it to be suitable for their own circumstances, to reduce commuting and congestion by 30%. Every little step helps.

More comfortable rides

For the majority of Singaporeans who have to commute daily to work, I suggest that the rides be made more comfortable. We should run more train and bus services to give more people a chance to have a seat during the journey.

While this may be difficult during the rush hours (when the trains and buses are run at full capacity), it is possible during the off-peak hours. Currently, the operators reduce the frequency of the trains or buses to save cost and make more profits. The trains and buses continue to be packed during the off-peak hours as well.

My specific proposals are:

– Set up a portal to promote home-based work

– Waive stamp duty on the purchase of an owner-occupied home

– Remove the fiscal incentive against renting

– Promote the setting up of workplaces in residential towns

– Encourage investing in residential REITs

– Offer more comfortable trips on trains and buses


Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

前马国游泳选手 因逃兵役判监八周

24岁的林清煌,曾在亚洲青年运动会等区域性比赛中,在邻国马来西亚旗帜下获得奖牌。但是拥有永久居民身份的他,却因为逃避兵役触犯国民服役征召法令,而被判坐牢八周。 2010年,林清煌来到新加坡,并在体育学校上学直到2013年,在这期间他获得学费和培训费用的补贴。 2014年3月,他在外国体育人才计划下,获得本地永久居民地位,但他也必须参与国民服役。 两个月后他就收到要履行国民服役的通知,但他以完成共和理工学院文凭申请延期,他的请求被批准,国民服役也展延至三年后,即2017年5月。 但与此同时,他获得一家私人机构提供奖学金,结果他没有完成本地学业,而是2014年9月起在美国一所大学留学。 2015年6月,他因担心担心之前的行为,将影响他入境新加坡参加2015年东南亚运动会,于是返回新加坡做体检。 7月7日,林清煌的体检结果显示,他的身体状况可以入伍。但他却在同日飞往美国,继续申请延迟履行国民服役。 2015年11月11日,林清煌没有如期入伍报到,警方向他发布紧急公报。 直到2018年6月11日,林清煌完成大学学业后才返回新加坡,直到2019年4月入伍,今年2月2日完成兵役。 林清煌是在本周二(9日),被提控触犯国民服役征召法令。他辩称自己“太专注于游泳”,且听从了父母“不好的建议”,选择在本地服兵役前,就飞到海外完成学业。

“I have not been asked by any party to come out and contest” – Presidential hopeful Tan Jee Say

Joshua Chiang/ Even though Mr Tan Jee Say has contested Holland-Bukit Timah…