tariffs-2.jpgThis article is filed under the new column, Letters to TOC.


In a ‘full’ page ad taken out in the TODAY newspaper on 28 Dec 2006, page 7, Singapore Power announced a surprising drop in electricity surcharges. Great news to kick off the new year if any!!

What was more amazing was that the full page ad listed the historical (back to 2001) prices and how they were pegged relative to raw fuel prices.The level of transparency is great. Applause!! Credit given where it is due.Now on to the the tough questions about the graph (the table later on).

So raw fuel prices have shot up tremendously in 2006 and have recently made a retreat, but final end user electricity prices have, relatively, been stable, some 19.87 cents per kWh in 2001 vs 21.64 cents per kWh (Oct 2006) whereas ‘oil’ in the same graph has gone from about USD $40 per barrel to a close of some USD $75 per barrel in October 2006.

Raw fuel prices have gone up 90% relative to end prices for the same period which appear to have risen some 8%? Somehow the math does not look right ……. even to a math idiot like me ….

How is this possible? And SP Services as far as I know will be paying out bonuses next year too! As they have been previous years from 2001.

Have Singaporeans really been complaining too much about the rising costs of living, about every single little price hike – like in the case of electricity when this ‘advertisement’ graph from SP demonstrates that prices have barely risen 8% over the last half decade?

Or has SP been making so much profit off the end consumer that it is still able to absorb the hike in raw fuel prices over the past 5 years, especially the last 2 years when things got really crazy in terms of oil prices? Was not the rise in worldwide oil price a justification used in every aspect of increase in cost of living in Singapore in 2005/6? How then is SP able to sustain itself financially, as an arm of Temasek Holdings no less.

Is Temasek Holdings subsidising Singapore in some way that the public does not know about? To the point of being able to buffer a price hike of 90% of raw fuel price?

Turning to the table in the same ‘advert’ next. This table shows the price decreases for electricity used. I’m no electrical engineer or any such thing so bear with some idiocy here please. What seems apparent is that the more one uses electricity it becomes cheaper? (I’m guessing that the higher the tension the more electricity is used/carried?)

(Revised prices for January 2007)
Extra High Tension 16.34
High Tension Large 19.23
High Tension Small 17.53
Low Tension 20.02 (residential, small business and other)

This query stands to challenge as I’m no electrician. Just an ordinary consumer asking on apparent price differences.I do not claim to have the answers, only questions thus far. But this is what greater transparency does. It opens up more for questioning. What the questioning begets are a multitude of effects, some chilling, others engaging, yet others simply leaves one fuming perhaps at times.

Most importantly, questioning leads to an active citizenry. Not questioning for the sake of questioning but questioning so that Singapore as a society can operate as a unanimous whole in the democratic sense. True participative citizenship as opposed to the ‘apparent prevalence’ of “it doesn’t bother me and I’ve got no say anyway.”

Perry Tong


Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Author of “Crazy Rich Asians” has not entered Singapore since 2000: Ministry of Home Affairs

The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) has declared yesterday (28 Aug) that…

酒醉、假冒警员还袭女子胸! 前SMRT职员被判入狱四周

SMRT职员酒后冒充警员,当着女子男友对女子袭胸,被判刑事暴力及冒充公务员罪,认罪后被判入狱四周。 被告为47岁的Ng Soon Hee,他于2019年3月22日下午1时30分,在武吉班让岗沙路第173座组屋附近发生。26岁的受害者和34岁的男友当时该喝啤酒,听到被告大喊后转身,只见被告趋近,并指责他们太吵了。 身穿SMRT制服的被告,向受害者们出示制服上的工作证件,却自称是警察,并阻止他们看清证件,还说晚上10时30分后不该喝酒,并对受害者说出猥琐话语。 男友不甘女友被侮辱,和被告对质。女子见状试图劝阻时,遭被告以手臂推开,还用手握住她的胸部后,再把女子推开。 女子当时就叫男友报警,而被告则显得无所畏惧,不断挑衅男友并爆出口。 被告被逮捕时,警方检测发现其每一百毫升血液中的酒精含量达108毫克。 被告原本被控冒充公务员、侮辱女性及非礼罪名,但是非礼控状之后被改为使用刑事暴力。被告于昨日就两项罪名认罪,侮辱女性罪名则交由法官下判时纳入考量。 控方曾要求对被告下判短期监刑,指被告的行为咄咄逼人且具侵犯性。辩方则求情表示,被告当时酒醉了,且非常配合警方调查。 冒充公务人员罪名一旦成立,被告可被判入狱不超过两年、罚款,或两者兼施;而刑事暴力罪成也将导致监禁不超过三个月,罚款不超过1500元,或两者兼施。

LKYSPP’s data shows CPF Basic Retirement Sum can’t meet $1,379 a month needed by elderly

The Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy (LKYSPP) at National University…


两名女子在疫情期间,为勿洛居民设立临时公共茶水间,让有需要者能够领取食物礼包。 两名女子为43岁活动策划师叶秀菁,和43岁主妇吴女士,两人在本月8日,于勿洛南一带的路旁设立临时茶水间(Pop-up Pantry),除了让居民捐赠食物,也让有需要者能够领取。 叶秀菁表示,她和吴女士俩人是小学同学,在阻断措施期间就萌生这样的想法,但碍于当时的情况无法付诸现实,因此在解封后,趁着国庆日前夕,将想法付诸行动。 她坦言,先向身边的朋友募捐,获得亲友的支持后,开始物色地点。在物色地点期间也费了一些心思,希望能达到既能让人捐赠食品,又可以方便有需要的人领取食物,于是选择了勿洛南一带的路旁。 “不过,我们后来发现捐的人多,领的人少,地点并不是最理想,因此转换场地,改到勿洛南第46座组屋附近‘摆摊’。” 消息一出后,也引发许多网友关注,截至目前已经获得逾1千次赞和转载,两人也紧接着设立脸书专页分享最新消息,并于今日早上在勿洛南第46座组屋附近开始摆摊。 许多人也开始响应这项活动,根据脸书专页表示,今日的食品都能够被领走,有些食品甚至需要补货,也有很多人向前给他们鼓励。