by Augustine Low

New citizens are given the red carpet welcome. They now carry the Singapore passport and belong to the country they consider the land of milk and honey.

What’s not to be happy about?

New citizens enjoy facilities and infrastructure that born and bred citizens spent decades toiling and paying taxes for.

They can try and can get along with born and bred citizens or they can choose to confine themselves to their enclave of like-minded new citizens who prefer like-minded activities.

And should they happen be among those identified as “foreign talents”, they are surely entitled to be a little swell-headed. To be singled out as a foreign talent, imported to help grow the country’s economy, that’s a very big deal.

Who’s to argue that they are indeed not better off than many born and bred citizens?

We were told in Parliament recently that last year, Singapore granted 23,100 new citizenships, with 1,300 going to children born overseas to Singaporean parents.

On average, 3,400 new citizens go through national service each year, Defence Minister Ng Eng Hen said in Parliament last August. So it is clear that the majority of male new citizens do not have to go through a rite of passage born and bred male citizens go through.

Safe to say, new citizens have it good in this country.

To whom do they owe their allegiance?

Unless they are stupid or ignorant, they know that there are many critics of the government’s welcoming embrace of foreigners. They also know that on this issue, the Opposition has raised many questions.

Is there any chance that new citizens will give their support and vote to the Opposition?

Conventional wisdom says no chance in hell.

Singapore’s low fertility rate can turn out to be a blessing for the People’s Action Party (PAP). It gives them the excuse and the opportunity to welcome more new citizens each year.

At the rate of 23,000 new citizens a year, there will be hundreds of thousands in 10, 20, 30 years. The numbers keep rising.

New citizens are a godsend to the PAP. New citizens will always have the back of the PAP.

Subscribe
Notify of
37 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

How did an Associate Professor of Law’s Article on PSP in the Straits Times get it so wrong?

The opinion piece by Kok Ming Cheang criticizes an article written by Eugene Tan, an Associate Professor of Law, which was published in The Straits Times. The author argues that Tan’s analysis of the Progress Singapore Party and its new Secretary-General, Leong Mun Wai, is flawed and biased. The author suggests that his descriptions of Leong and the party are unfair and inaccurate. The article is seen as a personal attack rather than an objective discourse on Singapore’s political landscape.

Netizen shares bizarre experience where job interviewer requested him to payback S$6.50 for coffee after declining job offer

A netizen recently took to social media to share a peculiar job interview encounter that left him dumbfounded. The netizen revealed that he was asked to attend a job interview at a local coffeeshop which was pretty much normal. However, the unusual aspect of the experience unfolded after the interview concluded. In a Facebook post on Tuesday (17 May), S narrated his absurd ordeal. According to screenshots of the WhatsApp conversation he shared, immediately after politely declining the job opportunity, the interviewer shockingly requested the netizen to reimburse the cost of the coffee, totaling $6.50.

Comparing apples with oranges – “Temasek outdid key benchmarks”?

Selective comparison is meaningless. Leong Sze Hian.

What the press conference on Zika infection told us and did not

In the press conference on Sunday held by Ministry of Health (MOH)…