• About Us
    • Fact Checking Policy
    • Ownership & funding information
    • Volunteer
  • Subscribe
  • Letter submission
    • Submissions Policy
  • Contact Us
The Online Citizen Asia
  • Opinion
    • Editorial
    • Commentaries
    • Letters
    • Comments
  • Current Affairs
    • Singapore
    • Malaysia
    • Indonesia
    • China
    • ASEAN
    • Asia
    • International
  • Finance
    • Economics
    • Labour
    • Property
    • Business
  • Community
    • Arts & Culture
    • Consumer Watch
    • NGO
    • Lifestyle
    • Travel
  • Politics
    • Civil Society
    • Parliament
    • Transport
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Health
    • Housing
  • Law & Order
    • Legislation
    • Court Cases
No Result
View All Result
  • Opinion
    • Editorial
    • Commentaries
    • Letters
    • Comments
  • Current Affairs
    • Singapore
    • Malaysia
    • Indonesia
    • China
    • ASEAN
    • Asia
    • International
  • Finance
    • Economics
    • Labour
    • Property
    • Business
  • Community
    • Arts & Culture
    • Consumer Watch
    • NGO
    • Lifestyle
    • Travel
  • Politics
    • Civil Society
    • Parliament
    • Transport
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Health
    • Housing
  • Law & Order
    • Legislation
    • Court Cases
No Result
View All Result
The Online Citizen Asia
No Result
View All Result

Defamation trial: “Since it defamed me, I consider it unfair,” says PM Lee

by The Online Citizen
30/11/2020
in Court Cases, Media
Reading Time: 6 mins read
16

Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong found the article currently at the heart of his defamation suit against TOC chief editor Terry Xu “unfair” as it had defamed him.

PM Lee testified as such in response to Mr Xu’s lawyer Lim Tean’s question on whether he thought the article was fair to him and his siblings.

PM Lee’s defamation suit against Mr Xu pertains to an article published on TOC on 15 August last year titled “PM Lee’s wife, Ho Ching weirdly shares article on cutting ties with family members”.

The article contained alleged defamatory statements made by PM Lee’s siblings Mr Lee Hsien Yang and Dr Lee Wei Ling in relation to the 38 Oxley Road dispute.

Mr Lim referenced a paragraph in the article under the “the Lee family feud” sub-heading, in which it was stated that PM Lee’s siblings had noted that their brother has rejected their attempts at reconciliation.

The relevant part of the article also stated that according to PM Lee’s siblings, PM Lee had invited all relatives except them during the first Chinese New Year reunion after their father Lee Kuan Yew’s death.

Mr Lim then asked PM Lee: “Now, you don’t complain about that, do you?”

PM Lee replied: “Why should I complain about everything in the article? I have taken advice and complained about five specific paragraphs.”

When Mr Lim asked if PM Lee had not found that to be defamatory of him, PM Lee’s lawyer Davinder Singh interjected: “Your Honour, how is that relevant whether other paragraphs are defamatory? Is my learned friend suggesting that he accepts these paragraphs are defamatory and there is more?”

Mr Lim clarified before the court that his question was relevant because they are crucial in establishing how PM Lee had known about the material in the article and subsequently formed the opinion that certain matters in the article were defamatory while others were not.

Justice Audrey Lim, in response, reasoned in summary that whether an article was defamatory is “whether it is understood to mean what it says”.

She then queried Mr Lim as to how the rest of the paragraphs were relevant to “whether the previous paragraphs are defamatory since they are not even the same event we are talking about”.

Mr Lim continued by highlighting to PM Lee that the article in question went on to explain the “problems faced” by Mr LHY’s wife Lee Suet Fern and their son Li Shengwu, to which PM Lee acknowledged.

Mr Lim then argued that it demonstrates that Mr Xu was “being fair” and “giving both sides of the story”.

PM Lee replied that “the question is whether you are being defamatory”, to which Mr Lim shot back: “Mr Lee, you are being the lawyer in that witness stand. I ask that you answer my questions. My question was when you read this article was Mr Terry Xu not being fair by putting out all sides of the story?”

PM Lee then responded that he does not render any judgment on the article.

“I am only concerned with the paragraphs that have defamed me,” he said.

Mr Lim then asked PM Lee: “I am asking you to render a judgment?”

Justice Lim interjected, saying that PM Lee as a witness “is entitled to give an opinion on whether he thinks it is fair”.

“If he doesn’t know, he can say he doesn’t know, because ultimately, whether or not your client is fair or what he thinks is fair is within his knowledge,” the judge elaborated.

When Justice Lim asked Mr Lim if asking PM Lee to render an opinion on the fairness of the article is relevant to the case at hand, Mr Lim replied in the affirmative.

Justice Lim then addressed PM Lee, asking if he thinks the article was written in a fair manner.

“You can say yes, no, or you don’t know,” she said.

Mr Lim subsequently prompted PM Lee for an answer, saying “Mr Lee, do you think the article was being fair to both you and your siblings?”

“Since it defamed me I consider it unfair. Whether it defames my siblings, I have no idea,” said PM Lee.

Background of PM Lee Hsien Loong’s defamation suit against TOC chief editor Terry Xu

PM Lee’s defamation suit against Mr Xu pertains to an article published on TOC on 15 August last year titled “PM Lee’s wife, Ho Ching weirdly shares article on cutting ties with family members”.

The article contained alleged defamatory statements made by PM Lee’s siblings Mr Lee Hsien Yang and Dr Lee Wei Ling in relation to the 38 Oxley Road dispute.

At the heart of the 38 Oxley Road dispute is the house owned by the Lee siblings’ late father and Singapore’s founding prime minister Lee Kuan Yew and the elder Lee’s wish to have the house demolished instead of being turned into a museum or government relic.

Mr LHY and Dr LWL are joint executors and trustees of Mr LKY’s estate.

In a joint statement released on 14 June 2017, which was shared on their Facebook pages, PM Lee’s two younger siblings claimed, among multiple other allegations, that PM Lee and his wife Ho Ching had defied Mr LKY’s wish to demolish the house.

They also alleged that PM Lee and Mdm Ho were responsible for instilling and perpetuating the Government’s stance to preserve the house at 38 Oxley Road, including PM Lee’s purported move to demonstrate that Mr LKY had changed his mind on having the house demolished.

Mr LHY and Dr LWL also claimed that PM Lee had engaged in abuse of power as Prime Minister to obtain a copy of the Deed of Gift from then-Minister of National Development Lawrence Wong, which was then passed to his personal lawyer Lucien Wong at the time for his own purpose.

The younger Lee siblings also alleged that Mdm Ho wielded significant influence in the Government despite not being a public official.

PM Lee issued a statement the same day to counter the allegations. Despite that, Mr LHY and Dr LWL continued to make claims against PM Lee in subsequent Facebook posts.

Following that, PM Lee announced in June the same year his plans to deliver a ministerial statement in Parliament the next month to address the allegations made by his siblings.

The prime minister delivered his ministerial statement on 3 July 2017, in which he branded the allegations as baseless.

PM Lee also said that he would not be suing Mr LHY and Dr LWL as doing so would further besmirch their parents’ name.

The next day, PM Lee delivered another ministerial statement, in which he said that he would not call for a Select Committee or a Commission of Inquiry to be convened into the 38 Oxley Road dispute and his siblings’ allegations.

Mr LHY and Dr LWL on 4 July — the same day PM Lee made his second ministerial statement on the matter — in a joint statement alleged that PM Lee had improperly misrepresented to LKY that the gazetting of 38 Oxley Road was either “inevitable” or that the house was already gazetted.

Two days later on 6 July, Mr LHY and Dr LWL jointly stated that they would not post any further evidence on the allegations if PM Lee and the Government do not interfere with Mr LKY’s wish — as well as their own — to have the house demolished.

PM Lee responded the same day by saying that he could not concede to his siblings’ demand to withdraw plans to deliver his ministerial statement and to hold the debate in Parliament, as well as disbanding the Ministerial Committee and not responding to their accusations.

Mr LHY and Dr LWL henceforth continued to make posts on matters relating to 38 Oxley Road.

However, PM Lee decided to file a defamation suit against Mr Xu for publishing the article that contained the allegedly defamatory statements made by Mr LHY and Dr LWL in relation to the 38 Oxley Road dispute.

Prior to that, PM Lee’s press secretary Chang Li Lin wrote to Mr Xu, asking the latter to remove the “libellous” article and to publish a “full and unconditional” apology.

PM Lee later began legal proceedings against Mr Xu after the latter had refused the demands made in Ms Chang’s letter.

The trial continues tomorrow on Tuesday (1 December).

For just US$7.50 a month, sign up as a subscriber on The Online Citizen Asia (and enjoy ads-free experience on our site) to support our mission to transform TOC into an alternative mainstream press.
Tags: 38 Oxley Road defamation suit

Related Posts

【诽谤诉讼】年初四进行口头辩论   林鼎提醒有兴趣旁听“早点排队”
Court Cases

S$156,573.20 raised on eighth day of TOC editor-in-chief’s crowdfunding campaign for defamation damages

09/09/2021
【诽谤诉讼】年初四进行口头辩论   林鼎提醒有兴趣旁听“早点排队”
Court Cases

S$143,852.48 raised on seventh day of TOC editor-in-chief’s crowdfunding campaign for defamation damages

08/09/2021
【诽谤诉讼】年初四进行口头辩论   林鼎提醒有兴趣旁听“早点排队”
Court Cases

S$127,380.76 raised on fifth day of TOC editor-in-chief’s crowdfunding campaign for defamation damages

06/09/2021
Court Cases

S$76,531.05 raised on third day of TOC editor-in-chief’s crowdfunding campaign for defamation damages

03/09/2021
【诽谤诉讼】年初四进行口头辩论   林鼎提醒有兴趣旁听“早点排队”
Court Cases

S$44,846.07 raised on second day of TOC editor-in-chief’s crowdfunding campaign for defamation damages

02/09/2021
PM Lee to donate damages of S$210,000 from defamation suit against TOC editor to charity
Court Cases

PM Lee to donate damages of S$210,000 from defamation suit against TOC editor to charity

02/09/2021
Subscribe
Connect withD
Login
I allow to create an account
When you login first time using a Social Login button, we collect your account public profile information shared by Social Login provider, based on your privacy settings. We also get your email address to automatically create an account for you in our website. Once your account is created, you'll be logged-in to this account.
DisagreeAgree
Notify of
Connect withD
I allow to create an account
When you login first time using a Social Login button, we collect your account public profile information shared by Social Login provider, based on your privacy settings. We also get your email address to automatically create an account for you in our website. Once your account is created, you'll be logged-in to this account.
DisagreeAgree
16 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Latest posts

Singapore warns slower economic growth in 2023

Less than 1 in 10 jobs created in first three quarters of 2022 went to Singaporeans?

28/01/2023
Peru Congress rejects president’s plan for early elections

Peru Congress rejects president’s plan for early elections

28/01/2023
UMNO purging members as it sacks former health minister Khairy and suspended ex-defence minister Hishammuddin

UMNO purging members as it sacks former health minister Khairy and suspended ex-defence minister Hishammuddin

28/01/2023
WHO panel in talks on COVID emergency status

WHO panel in talks on COVID emergency status

27/01/2023

Two years after Myanmar coup, UN says situation ‘catastrophic’

27/01/2023
Grab driver supposedly earned $5,227.82 in a week prior CNY, netizens voice worries over his health

Grab driver supposedly earned $5,227.82 in a week prior CNY, netizens voice worries over his health

27/01/2023
Philippines to appeal ICC resumption of drug war probe

ICC grants new inquiry into Manila’s deadly ‘war on drugs’

27/01/2023
Minister refutes claims of Malaysia consulting Singapore on housing policy due to its inefficient civil service

Minister refutes claims of Malaysia consulting Singapore on housing policy due to its inefficient civil service

27/01/2023

Trending posts

Two Indian nationals paid about S$330 and S$730 respectively for forged certificates submitted in their S-Pass application

MOM found issuing EPs meant for foreign PMETs to PRC waitress and general worker

by Correspondent
26/01/2023
40

...

Earning only S$400 a month, delivery-rider turned hawker threw in the towel after two years of running a rojak stall

Earning only S$400 a month, delivery-rider turned hawker threw in the towel after two years of running a rojak stall

by Yee Loon
26/01/2023
24

...

Ho Ching breaks silence over Temasek’s write down of its US$275 million investment in FTX, says it “can afford to be contrarian”

US regulator questions VCs’ due diligence work prior to investing in FTX; Ho Ching says Temasek can afford to be contrarian

by The Online Citizen
24/01/2023
28

...

Indian rupee falls 60% since signing of CECA while Singapore becomes top investor in India

by Correspondent
25/01/2023
56

...

Temasek and GIC reportedly in talks with Adani Group accused of “brazen” market manipulation and accounting fraud

Temasek and GIC reportedly in talks with Adani Group accused of “brazen” market manipulation and accounting fraud

by The Online Citizen
26/01/2023
49

...

Defamation trial: “Since it defamed me, I consider it unfair,” says PM Lee

by The Online Citizen
30/11/2020
16

...

November 2020
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30  
« Oct   Dec »
  • About Us
  • Subscribe
  • Letter submission
  • Contact Us

© 2006 - 2021 The Online Citizen

No Result
View All Result
  • Opinion
    • Editorial
    • Commentaries
    • Comments
  • Current Affairs
    • Malaysia
    • Indonesia
    • China
    • ASEAN
    • Asia
    • International
  • Finance
    • Economics
    • Labour
    • Property
    • Business
  • Community
    • Civil Society
    • Arts & Culture
    • Consumer Watch
    • NGO
  • Politics
    • Parliament
    • Transport
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Health
    • Housing
  • Law & Order
    • Legislation
    • Court Cases
  • Lifestyle
    • Travel
  • Subscribers login

© 2006 - 2021 The Online Citizen

wpDiscuz