Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong revealed in an interview with Bloomberg News recently that Singapore “ will not be last in the queue” to receive COVID-19 vaccine as it has made deals with different COVID-19 vaccine makers to ensure that the country will receive the doses once it’s ready.

He also noted that Asian countries have managed to get its people to comply with pandemic measures much better than their Western counterparts. PM Lee said this in the interview which went on-air on Tuesday (17 November) for its New Economy Forum.

When asked by Bloomberg editor-in-chief John Micklethwait if smaller countries have to be concern about getting a vaccine amid worldwide demand, Mr Lee pointed out that larger countries would “get some of their way” in making sure they be placed top in the waiting list.

“It is a pity because the WHO (World Health Organisation) makes a very valid point that the best way to get COVID-19 under control is to have a rational scheme of priorities to distribute the vaccine to the places where it will make the most difference to the outbreak,” PM Lee said.

He added, “But to optimise that, on a global scale (of) around 200 countries, I think is going to be very hard”.

If that’s not all, PM Lee also asserted that a few vaccine candidates would pass muster, and in a few years’ time, these would be widely available and be much more affordable as well.

“But I do not think you would have finished protecting the world’s population within the next year,” he said.

He continued, “Furthermore, you are not sure what risks and problems may arise. We have to learn as we feel our way forward”.

Singapore has created a committee to plan those who will be prioritised to receive the vaccine first before others when it is released by the companies which it is engaged in talks with. The companies include pharmaceutical giant Pfizer, as well as with the joint effort by scientists at Singapore’s Duke-NUS Medical School and US firm Arcturus Therapeutics.

Pfizer has earlier announced that its vaccine is 90 percent effective, while the initial batch of vaccine from the Singapore-US joint venture is expected to be shipped in the first three months of next year.

Separately, Mr Lee was also asked on why Asia has managed to handle the pandemic better than others, with Mr Micklethwait pointing out hundreds of deaths per million people in the United States, Britain and Germany compared to single-digit numbers in Singapore and China.

To this, PM Lee said that people in Asia complied with the rules like wearing masks or practising safe distancing, as opposed to the Europeans or Americans “where after some time you are fed up and tired of being locked down, and there is a push back… You want to go out and let your hair down and have a drink and have a rave”.

However, he also agreed that Singapore has been lucky.

“We have quite an elderly population, so if there had been many community cases, I think we would have had a large number of causalities and deaths too,” he explained.

PM Lee noted that the city-state managed to contain the spread of the coronavirus at the migrant worker dormitories, provide medical treatment to the workers and keep them and the population safe.

Moving forward, Singapore’s challenge now is to find a safe way to reopen its borders for business and tourism without bringing in more import cases of the coronavirus into the country.

“If you are a country like China, you can decide to close all your entry points practically and be in splendid isolation for quite some time without much difficulty,” said PM Lee.

“But for Singapore, that is going to be very tough.”

As of Tuesday, Singapore recorded six new cases of COVID-19 bringing the total number of infections in the country to 58,130.

Subscribe
Notify of
26 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

新加坡能复制大马变天?(3) “自由主义专制国” 覃炳鑫:行动党营造恐惧层层操控

历史学者覃炳鑫认为,新加坡当权政府人民行动党对国家公器的使用和社会结构操控,都有别于马来西亚。他从历史进展过程和体制角度,分析新马两国的不同之处,阐述新加坡当权者,拥有极度倾斜的选举游戏规则、高度集中的权利,还有近乎包山包海的社会文化控制,成为新加坡变天的层层阻碍。 从社会经济层面,国阵并没有如人民行动党一般,集中式地垄断政权。“1955年选举,国阵横扫51席。不过在一些地方议会却败给反对党(而后国阵索性取消掉地方议会选举,直到今天仍未回复)。在此后选举,也无法掌控一些州属政权,如吉兰丹和登嘉楼。” “1969年,513事件爆发,当时国阵宣布进入紧急状态、悬空国会,推出新经济政策、国家五大原则等有利国阵政权的政策。在1974年,说服民政党和伊斯兰党加入国阵。” 覃炳鑫是在本月18日,出席在邻国柔佛举行的“新加坡能复制大马变天?”时事论坛上,列出处以上历史事实,让出席者了解马新两国、国阵和人民行动党之间的差异,从而得知两国面对的不同处境。 他说明,国阵从未如行动党般,享有过绝对论断的政权,马国幅员较广、社群多元,政治体制分为多层次。 相对下,人民行动党在1959年取得政权后,马上废除地方议会、市镇会选举,权力集中,取消各独立组织,或以新组织取而代之,例如直接由总理管辖的人民协会。 再者,破坏新闻独立,把所有媒体由国家掌控。至于可能成为异议分子温床的律师公会、宗教团体、工会和独中等,不是被收编就是被废除。 https://youtu.be/jng2bchnu-U 一个“自由主义专制国” 他引述《悉尼先驱晨报》对人民行动党的描述: 透过司法、控制媒体、以及恶法打压异议份子,藉此牢牢掌控政权。新加坡属自由民主(liberal democracy)政体,但是有形无实,使他成为一个“自由主义专制国家”(liberal…

Malaysians praise hotel manager’s effort in selling hotel food on roadside to help business stay afloat

A hotel manager in Penang has resorted to selling the hotel’s food…

国人从未排外! 只求妥善管理外籍人才的流入

作者:Augustine Low 政府统计单位民情联系组(REACH)近日发布最新调查,结果显示多数国人同意对外国人保持开放的态度。 这无疑与各部长的声明相呼应,即呼吁国人应对外国人保持开放态度,与国际和外国人保有联系。 正如贸工部长陈振声近日所说,“新加坡深知对国外与世界保持开放态度的重要性,这永远都不会变。” 可是,他们不就是在陈述显而易见的事实,忽略问题的症结点吗? 国人向来并没有大声疾呼地完全排除掉外籍人士,而是要求对外籍人士的流入进行管理,确保新加坡人不在自己的国家内受到歧视! 一直有人哭喊必须消除不公平聘雇问题、解决外国PMET、调整就业准证和SPass的问题。简言之,新加坡人更希望获得一个平起平坐的机会,不需要顾及左右,危及土生土长的新加坡人的权益。 但从来都没有人在社交媒体上高喊,新加坡必须完全封闭外籍人士,以至于需要对大多数国人进行调查,征得国人同意,保证国家对外开放吗? 我们是否需要部长反复提醒我们新加坡需要对外开放,与国际保持联系吗? 对外开放是一码事,而国家充斥外籍人士是另一码事。这两者将还是有所差距的。 要么我们的执政者没有顾虑到这一点,要么是故意将其夸大,将外国人管理等同关闭国家外国人才入口,将情绪堆积到最高点。…

Women’s armpits in China – a battleground for equality

“Girls are often anxious about their armpit hair as if it’s a…