• About Us
    • Fact Checking Policy
    • Ownership & funding information
  • Volunteer
    • Internship with The Online Citizen
  • Donation
  • Subscription
  • Letter submission
    • Submissions Policy
  • Contact Us
The Online Citizen Asia
  • Opinion
    • Editorial
    • Commentaries
    • Comments
  • Current Affairs
    • Malaysia
    • Indonesia
    • China
    • ASEAN
    • Asia
    • International
  • Finance
    • Economics
    • Labour
    • Property
    • Business
  • Community
    • Civil Society
    • Arts & Culture
    • Consumer Watch
    • NGO
  • Politics
    • Parliament
    • Transport
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Health
    • Housing
  • Law & Order
    • Legislation
    • Court Cases
  • Lifestyle
    • Travel
No Result
View All Result
  • Opinion
    • Editorial
    • Commentaries
    • Comments
  • Current Affairs
    • Malaysia
    • Indonesia
    • China
    • ASEAN
    • Asia
    • International
  • Finance
    • Economics
    • Labour
    • Property
    • Business
  • Community
    • Civil Society
    • Arts & Culture
    • Consumer Watch
    • NGO
  • Politics
    • Parliament
    • Transport
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Health
    • Housing
  • Law & Order
    • Legislation
    • Court Cases
  • Lifestyle
    • Travel
No Result
View All Result
The Online Citizen Asia
No Result
View All Result

Did Minister Shanmugam make a veiled threat in Parliament to the person who helped draft Parti Liyani’s complaint?

"It is a privilege to speak in Parliament, and he should not use this privilege to accuse or rebuke people who have no opportunity to respond to his allegations."

by The Online Citizen
05/11/2020
in Commentaries
Reading Time: 2 mins read
42

Law and Home Affairs Minister K Shanmugam speaking in Parliament on 4 November 2020 (Screenshot from CNA parliamentary broadcast)

by Teo Soh Lung

I was watching CNA News last night when Law and Home Affairs Minister K Shanmugam made a strange remark which appear to me to be a veiled threat.

The Minister was asked by Leader of the Opposition (LO) Pritam Singh about Ms Parti Liyani’s complaint of 3 July – which was republished by HOME yesterday (4 Nov).

One of the areas of complaint was this:

“In Court, there was possible tampering with evidence in an attempt to cast me as being untruthful to the Court. During my cross-examination, when the Deputy Public Prosecutor (DPP) asked the police officer to hand me the Gerald Genta watch, my lawyer observed that the police officer started shaking the watch while it was in his hand.

“I was then asked if the watch was working. At that point, and as the watch was passed around the Courtroom, its hands were moving. But during re-examination when my lawyer specifically asked the police officer not to shake the watch, the watch hands did not move at all.”

Instead of answering Mr Singh (which I believe must be about the outcome of the complaint), the Minister said he didn’t understand why the complaint was made, and said something to the effect that it was not made by Ms Liyani.

What does the Minister mean when he said it was not made by Ms Liyani? If his statement meant that someone had assisted her in drafting the complaint, is that illegal or improper? If his intent is to hint that he knows who helped Ms Liyani draft the complaint, then I think it is most improper to use Parliament in this manner.

I sat up when I heard his remark. It appeared to me that he was making a veiled threat to the person who helped draft the complaint.

The Minister should get on with his job. It is a privilege to speak in Parliament, and he should not use this privilege to accuse or rebuke people who have no opportunity to respond to his allegations.

I was not in Parliament to watch the debates, and I may be wrong to arrive at this conclusion. But I hope the AGC/Police investigation report did address Ms Liyani’s complaint of 3 July 2020.

Tampering with evidence by shaking the watch to make it move is very serious, and I hope this is not true.

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Tags: K ShanmugamParti Liyani
Subscribe
Connect withD
Login
I allow to create an account
When you login first time using a Social Login button, we collect your account public profile information shared by Social Login provider, based on your privacy settings. We also get your email address to automatically create an account for you in our website. Once your account is created, you'll be logged-in to this account.
DisagreeAgree
Notify of
I allow to create an account
When you login first time using a Social Login button, we collect your account public profile information shared by Social Login provider, based on your privacy settings. We also get your email address to automatically create an account for you in our website. Once your account is created, you'll be logged-in to this account.
DisagreeAgree
42 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Recent Posts

  • Only 1 in 5 surveyed confident of 4G leaders, Blackdot Research study finds
  • Taiwan truck driver charged with negligent homicide over rail crash
  • Myanmar’s ousted MPs form shadow government
  • France says ‘highly probable’ EU won’t renew AstraZeneca orders
  • Jimmy Lai: the Hong Kong media tycoon that China loathes
  • Jimmy Lai among five Hong Kong democracy activists jailed
  • Rebel groups see opportunity in post-coup Myanmar
  • Parti Liyani becomes first to seek compensation under Section 359(3) CPC against AGC for ‘frivolous or vexatious’ prosecution

Trending posts

S’pore economy grows 0.2% in first quarter; MAS keeps monetary policy unchanged amid low core inflation outlook

Ho Ching shares not 1, not 2, but 7 Facebook posts by Chan Chun Sing in a row within 15 minutes

WP MP Gerald Giam’s intervention helped solve traffic congestion issue at Hougang Capeview

PM Lee seeking nearly S$130,000 in legal costs and disbursements from blogger Leong Sze Hian; much of disbursements tied to engagement of Hong Kong expert witness

Here’s why many Singaporeans aren’t bothered who the ruling party chooses to become PM

HDB steps up to assist single mom after her social media post on being given unliveable flat goes viral

FB post criticising Minister Chan Chun Sing’s leadership skills re-emerges in light of recent 4G leadership discussion

Blogger Roy Ngerng hits fundraising target in 8 days for damages to be paid to PM Lee over libel suit

MP Poh Li San explains to media why RSAF Super Puma was replaced with Airbus H225M

Unqualified supervising lawyer in trainee dispute was once a Deputy Public Prosecutor

Load More
November 2020
MTWTFSS
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30 
« Oct   Dec »
  • About Us
  • Volunteer
  • Donation
  • Subscription
  • Letter submission
  • Contact Us

© 2006 - 2021 The Online Citizen

No Result
View All Result
  • Opinion
    • Editorial
    • Commentaries
    • Comments
  • Current Affairs
    • Malaysia
    • Indonesia
    • China
    • ASEAN
    • Asia
    • International
  • Finance
    • Economics
    • Labour
    • Property
    • Business
  • Community
    • Civil Society
    • Arts & Culture
    • Consumer Watch
    • NGO
  • Politics
    • Parliament
    • Transport
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Health
    • Housing
  • Law & Order
    • Legislation
    • Court Cases
  • Lifestyle
    • Travel
  • Subscribers login

© 2006 - 2021 The Online Citizen

wpDiscuz
42
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply