Source: La Prensa Latina

Spain was bracing for a new national state of emergency to allow the imposition of curfews as its regions on Saturday pushed for action to slow surging virus cases.

In the face of growing calls for a legal framework to allow regional chiefs to impose tougher restrictions, Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez’s cabinet was to hold a special meeting on Sunday to decide on the matter.

The calls came just days after Spain registered more than one million virus cases, becoming the sixth country in the world to pass the grim milestone — and the first in the European Union.

So far, nine of Spain’s 17 autonomous regions have formally requested that the government declare a national state of emergency which would enable them to impose a curfew — a measure increasingly applied across Europe.

Spain used such powers in the spring to enforce one of the world’s tightest lockdowns, and a similar measure has been in force in Madrid for the past fortnight — although only to impose movement restrictions on the capital and various nearby towns.

That measure ended just before 1500 GMT when new regional restrictions came into force, including a ban on all gatherings, in public and private, of people who don’t live in the same household between midnight and 6:00 am.

“They probably should have done this a long time ago or taken other steps like restricting the number of people taking public transport or going to work,” 22-year-old student Patricia Vazquez told AFPTV.

“In Spain, the restrictions are different in each region. In Madrid, if you look at how the infections are evolving, it seems like they’re not taking the necessary steps,” agreed Eduardo Debiasi, 48, who works in marketing and said more should be done.

A growing consensus

Elsewhere, Castilla and Leon announced its own curfew without waiting for a government declaration, banning movement between 10:00 pm and 6:00 am, while Valencia is to bring in a similar ban in on Sunday.

Catalonia also said it would implement a curfew as soon as a national emergency was declared and admitted the option of a new stay-at-home order was also under consideration.

Although the government can impose an emergency for up to a fortnight, it would need parliamentary approval to extend it — not a given for the leftwing coalition.

So far, none of the regions run by the rightwing opposition Popular Party (PP) have requested a national emergency, mirroring the party’s ongoing bitter standoff with the Sanchez government over its handling of the pandemic.

But for now, the government seems to have secured enough support to push through any future extension without relying on the PP, with backing from the centre-right Ciudadanos and Basque and Catalan separatist parties — together accounting for 37 seats.

The latest figures show the virus has claimed nearly 35,000 lives in Spain and infected 1,046,132 people, although antibody tests suggest a figure of more than three million.

 

— AFP

Subscribe
Notify of
2 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

手术预估费高昂、一份医疗报告100元? 樟宜医院发文解释

一名市民揶揄,公共医院似乎并不鼓励病患看病,不仅开出比实际费用高六倍的预估费用,交给保险公司的医药报告,也跟病患收100新元,令他感到不可理喻。 市民周晋国(译音)曾于2月26日在海峡时报论坛(ST Forum)上,非议樟宜综合医院的收费。 周先生的女佣,日前到樟宜医院动手术。女佣入院时院方告知,住C级病房的五天费用,估计高达1万5000到1万8000新元。不过最终女佣仅住院两天,费用仅2千930.70新元。 他对何以设定高昂的预估费用感到不解:“预估费用比实际费用高出六倍,有什么意义?” 他补充,“病患可能被高昂的预估费用吓着,打退堂鼓而选择不接受治疗”。 索赔医疗报告收100新元 此外,在所有收费中,他发现樟宜医院也向他征收100新元,用于付还职总英康( NTUC Income)要求下的的医疗报告。 “既然已经有一份住院病患的出院表格,清楚列明病患的医疗状况和程序,为什么保险公司还要一份医疗报告?”他认为,撰写医疗报告不像很复杂的任务,何以要征收100元?即便专科看诊也没那么贵。 他呼吁政府管制这些医院对于医疗报告的收费数额。…

近万人分享涉诽谤贴文 鄞义林:总理应一一提告

博客鄞义林昨晚于脸书发文,发现涉诽谤内容的The Coverage新闻文章,被分享次数多达9097人,然而只有时评人梁实轩因为分享有关贴文而被总理提告。 “有近万人分享了有关贴文,偏偏只有梁实轩被提告。” 他指出,梁实轩甚至只是纯粹分享贴文,也没有留下任何评述。其他同样在社交媒体分享转发贴文的人,却没被对付。 “既然如此,不是很明显地搞个人针对吗?”鄞义林认为,如果要体现法律公平,总理应该对近万名分享贴文的人提告。 再者,总理以文章的诽谤内容提告梁实轩,即便后者从未对有关文章做出任何评述。总理实则应该直接针对原撰文者,但他却没这么做,说明总理处事偏颇。 只因一人“龙颜大怒”就提告他人,岂有公平可言?鄞义林认为秉持法律公平原则,总理可能败诉,总理也应对其搞个人针对的行为,接受惩罚。 在2014年,部落客鄞义林也因为英语文章《您的公积金去了哪?城市丰收教会审讯的启示》,也同样被李显龙总理提告。鄞义林最后向总理致歉,并被判需赔偿15万元。 梁实轩在去年11月初,因分享一则涉诽谤内容贴文,而被总理提告。即便梁已经按照资媒局指示撤下转发贴文,还是接到了总理代表律师的信函,要求后者对总理公开道歉和赔偿名誉损失。 梁实轩目前已反告总理滥用司法程序。  

《独立》拒绝撤二文章和道歉 富食客恫言采法律行动

职总富食客将对本地时事网站《独立新加坡》(The Independent Singapore)采取法律行动。富食客代表律师致函《独立》要求该网站在本周二下午三点前,撤下指涉富食客导致年迈小贩过劳死的文章,并作出道歉,不过遭到《独立》拒绝。 《独立》在本月20日下午6时23分,才收到富食客代表律师David Lim&Partner的来函,指该网媒刊登的两篇文章含有诽谤成分,导致富食客名誉受损,要求后者撤下。 第一篇文章有关读者爆料,指有年迈小贩被富食客“欺压”,在农历新年期间申请缩短营业遭拒,为避富食客罚款,被迫工作18小时,导致过劳死。 第二篇文章则指,富食客对同样在樟宜机场第四航空楼食阁营生的年迈小贩,罚款3500元,原因是后者脚伤无法开档数日。 富食客认为第一篇文章“含有不实和误导信息”,有关假消息在网络传播将造成不良社会影响。 富食客已在周一在脸书专页刊载文告,澄清上述两篇文章内容。 《独立》:除非能证明造假才删文 富食客针对第一篇文章澄清,富食客并未受到已故年迈小贩方先生,缩短营业时间的申请。富食客分支经理在今年2月19日,有发现方先生身体不适,说服他去接受治疗,并找人顶替他的位置。孰料,下午就传来方先生因心脏衰竭过世的消息。 至于被罚款3500元的小贩,富食客则指出,管理层曾在上述小贩休业一星期后,发出三天内开档便取消罚款的提议,但对方没有这么做。而事件发生时,摊主正在进行摊位转让,因此触犯了提前终止条款。…

SPH and Mediacorp remain silent on criticisms and concerns by various statements published by different groups on POFMA

After the Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Bill (POFMA) was proposed…