The recent case of Parti Liyani in which the high court acquitted the domestic worker of four theft charges she was previously convicted on following a police report filed by her former employer, Liew Mun Leong, reminds us of another case between an employer and domestic worker about alleged theft.

Back in 2016, an Indian National preschool teacher, Desai Asti Amit was sentenced to seven weeks in jail for framing her domestic helper of stealing a gold pendant.

In that case, the employer, Ms Desai, was unhappy with her domestic worker’s work performance—also an Indian National, named Kinmei Dangmei—and purported poor attitude since she started working at her employers flat.

Mdm Kinmei asked twice to leave, but was not allowed to. At some point when Mdm Kimei was out with her employer’s son at the playground, Ms Desai planted a gold pendant and a metal prayer cup in the domestic workers luggage so that she might be caught red-handed for stealing.

The next day, Mdm Kimei ran away and sought sanctuary at a welfare organisation before being taken to the maid agency. However, she only took a small bag with her containing her wallet, phone and passport. She left her luggage in the flat.

Later, her employers brought her luggage to the maid agency where it was inspected. It was then that the gold pendant and prayer cup were found, prompting Ms Desai’s husband to call the police.

Mdm Kimei was arrested and held in a police station lockup for a day before being released on bail.

A couple of weeks or so later when giving a police statement, Ms Desai admitted to the police that she had framed her employee who had since returned home.

In court, Ms Desai’s lawyer, Louis Joseph, said that his client’s conscience pricked after lodging the report against her helper and when Ms Kinmei was arrested. On the same day, Ms Desai and her husband even went back to the police station to attempt to withdraw the report but were unable to do so.

The lawyer said she felt truly remorseful and offered to compensate Ms Kinmei.

In that case, the employer confessed to framing her domestic worker of theft and she was sentenced to 7 weeks of jail for that. The maximum punishment for giving false information to a public servant is one year of jail and a $5,000 fine.

Compared to the recent case of Parti Liyani, Mr Liew—chairman of Changi Airport Group—seemed adamant in seeing through the charges against his foreign domestic worker of nine years and putting her in jail.

Parti would have had to serve a sentence of two years and two months in jail if the conviction hadn’t been overturned by the High Court. The Deputy Public Prosecutor (DPP) has sought a three-year jail term but it was reduced by the District Judge through the effort of Parti’s lawyer, Anil Balchandani.

In his findings, High Court judge Justice Chan Seng Onn noted that he found the Mr Liew and his son, Karl Liew, to have “improper motive” in filing a report against Parti.

In the High Court judgement, Justice Chan wrote:

“It is clear to me based on the evidence at the trial below that Parti was in fact made to do illegal cleaning work at Karl’s residence at 39 CL and at Karl’s office. Parti’s evidence is that she received $10 for two to three days of work, and the payment was not regular. In fact, there was a prior dispute between Parti and the Liew family over the cleaning of the toilet in 39 CL; when Mdm Ng requested Parti to do so, she refused. There was also another incident where Parti refused to cook extra food for Karl.”

He continued:

It is significant that at some time prior to her termination, Parti had expressed unhappiness for being made to do additional cleaning work at Karl’s home in 39 CL and at his office, probably without adequate compensation. It demonstrates Parti’s prior unhappiness in relation to such an arrangement, which was illegal and an offence against the MOM regulations.”

Later in the judgment, after considering several other specific evidences showing that the prosecution witnesses were inconsistent and questionable in its testimony, he said: “In the light of the above circumstances, the Defence has sufficiently demonstrated an underlying factual basis in support of its allegation of an improper motive on the part of Karl and Mr Liew.”

Following from that, the question this raises is why the Attorney General’s Chamber (AGC) did not spot these inconsistencies during the original trial? And why did the DPP prevent Parti’s lawyer, Mr Balchandani, from clarifying these statements made by the Liew family during the course of the trial?

And if, as the 2016 case shows, the AGC is so strict about false statements and reports, what will it do regarding the Liew family now in light of Justice Chan’s findings of improper motive?

Notify of
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

空降将领掌官企 依循“传统”,还是选贤任能?

随着近期爆发新保集团病患个资遭外泄事件,引起民众对国内网络保安隐忧,特别关注负责网安的网络安全局(CSA)等部门,部署网安防御的能力。 新加坡民主党秘书长徐顺全则抨击,军中高层退伍后,往往被“空降”到各个公共或官联机构中,受政治委任的“不成文传统”,“他们在军中平步青云,受到提拔,分派到各个官联机构中担要职。” 他列举出伍逸松、郭木财和吕德耀等人,在接掌公共或官联机构之前,皆出身军中高层。徐顺全认为,他们在这些机构缺乏绩效,却可以免受问责。 “前海军中将吕德耀加入行动党并在2006年参选。随后被委交通部长,其中一项不幸的任务就是解决极度难搞的捷运系统问题。” 在2015年捷运瘫痪事故,引起民众不满,吕德耀只好识相退出政坛,宣布不再参选。但随后,他又被委新加坡驻日本大使。 伍逸松是武装部队第五任三军总长,中将军衔,2007年退伍后担任东方海皇集团主席暨总裁,2017年则接任新加坡报业控股(SPH Holding)执行总裁至今。 郭木财则在2007年至2010年任三军总长,2010年受委环境及水源部常任秘书(发展),2012年任新加坡捷运总裁。 去年,另一位前军队准将许智贤,则受委掌管两个新开设的网络安全机构,即负责全国网络防卫事务的国防网络署(DCO),以及直接隶属总理署旗下的网络安全局(CSA),负责“协调公共与私人领域保卫我国关键系统”。 我国对网络保安的重视,致使政府对资讯工艺的拨款从5巴仙提升至8巴仙,据《海峡时报》报导,仅在2014财政年,新加坡就为网络安全项目耗费了4亿零860万新元。 许智贤毕业自伦敦国王学院电子工程学士,随后考获哈佛大学公共管理博士学位。在军中他担任通信官,以及在联合参谋部(Joint Staff)的联合通信与资讯系统部门主任。随后许智贤也受委国防部副常任秘书(特殊项目)。…

担忧马国政府边界措施再U转 大批马劳越堤回国

听到马国政府宣布,强制要求于本周五起入境该国的所有国民和外籍人士入住隔离中心,今早已有大批马劳从柔佛长堤步行通关回国,一度形成长长人龙。 尽管马来西亚国家天灾管理机构于昨晚(22日)发文宣布,24日起通过陆路从我国入境马国,新马民众都无需强制入住隔离中心,但依旧有大批大马人宁愿越过长堤,步行通关,只为了能够回家。 一些马国客工反映,不少人原本就打算今早返马,加上担心马国政府措施临时U转,才选择在今天越堤入境。 由于许多人纷纷趁今日通关,也导致长堤内出现常常的人龙,从新山苏丹依斯干达关卡、关税及检疫大厦延伸至柔佛长堤,惟在今早10时45分后才人龙才逐渐舒缓。 马国政府昨日(23日)指出,从新山关卡和新马第二通道入境该国的马国公民和新加坡公民,自7月24日起,入境者都无需被强制隔离入住隔离中心。 然而,仍阻止不了许多马劳纷纷回国的心,因为马国政府才在周二宣布,强制要求于本周五起入境该国的所有国民和外籍人士入住隔离中心,不再居家隔离,且入住者还需自行缴付入隔离费用。

IMDA declares States Times Review article “baseless and defamatory”; orders a takedown

The Info-communications Media Development Authority (IMDA) has declared that the controversial article…


新加坡卫生部在一小时前于脸书专页公告,截至今日(5日)下午3时,卫生部未再接获可疑肺炎病例通知。 该部在昨日发声明,一名曾到武汉的中国籍三岁女童,出现肺炎症状。该部中指出,经过临床检测、实验室化验结果,证实该女童病例与此前武汉的不明肺炎没有关联。 当局也对女童进行了沙斯肺炎和中东呼吸综合症检查,都呈阴性反应。 女童患上的肺炎,是呼吸管道合胞病毒引起,也是导致儿童呼吸道感染常见病因。 卫生部此前指,女童未到过传出不明肺炎的武汉华南海鲜批发市场。 当局目前也在侦测寻找那些近期从武汉返回的类似肺炎病例,也估计可能出现更多可疑病例,待检测是否与武汉有关联。 卫生部表示仍会密切注意事态进展。 当局也呼吁民众保持警惕,并保持良好个人卫生情况,至于前往武汉的旅客则必须注意个人健康状况,若感到不适宜立即就医和向医生透露自身近期的行程。