Left: Facebook post by MP Yacob Ibrahim which was removed after wide criticism. Right: Minister K Shanmugam

The Corona Virus outbreak in Singapore has thrown up many issues not least of all the inherent and disturbing racism, classism and ignorance that exists in our society.

What makes things worse however, is the fact that a national broadsheet with a large readership has allowed an article/letter dripping with bigotry to be published.

This article, published in Lianhe Zaobao pointed to the lack of hygiene on the part of our foreign blue collar workers as well as their cultural differences with us in relation to cleanliness as what led to the COVID-19 outbreak within their ranks.

Needless to say, this is an article written by someone with zero understanding of how our country has enabled and allowed our foreign blue collar workers to be poorly housed. Do you think anyone would share a room, toilet facilities and kitchens with twenty to thirty other men by choice? Do you think they wouldn’t rather eat at a nice swanky restaurant on off days rather than sit outside on the floor?

The truth of the matter is that they are paid so little that there is hardly anything else that they can afford to do but to sit outside. The fact that the columnist is a self-entitled ignoramus is not something that needs proving. His or her article speaks for itself.

What is morally reprehensible and utterly irresponsible is the editorial decision to allow such an article to be published in the first place and at a time of pandemic to boot! Are there going to be repercussions for this poor editorial decision? What a pity that the “fake news” act (i.e. the Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act ) (also known as POFMA) cannot be used on this because this sure falls under the umbrella of propagating “fake news”.

This Lianhe Zaobao article must have caused consternation within the ranks of government as well given that Law and Home Affairs Minister K Shanmugam has commented that the letter revealed “underlying racism” and was “xenophobic and deeply insensitive”. That it also typecasted “an entire group and reflected a “lack of understanding of why we have this transmission of COVID-19  amongst our foreign workers.”

While Shanmugam’s comments are spot on, the government in which he serves must also take some responsibility in enabling this sort of “Chinese privilege”.

Firstly, why has our education system not taught us about the contributions our foreign workers make? Why does the curriculum not show us the reality of how they have to live?

Secondly, why are Members of Parliament (MP) such as Yaacob Ibrahim not publicly chastised for deeply offensive posts on Facebook (FB) such as the one he recently made where he was essentially celebrating the absence of foreign workers in open spaces in his constituency at a time when the migrant workers are unable to come out because they are in quarantine or lock down?

As a member of the ruling Peoples’ Action Party (PAP), his public statements reflect government opinion. In the face of public ignorance, Ibrahim’s public statements as a PAP MP will definitely be taken by some as conclusive proof that our migrant workers are somehow culturally inferior. Singaporeans (including Ibrahim) have conveniently forgotten that they only have the lives they have because they (by callous fate) were born into a first world country and the opportunities it affords. Had the wheel of fortune spun a different way, they could have been born into a third world country and be labourers themselves!  It is simply luck – nothing to do with superiority or inferiority.

Thirdly, our Ministry of Health and our Ministry of Manpower consistently makes our migrant workers the centre of focus in relation to the COVID-19 spread.

Manpower Minister Josephine Teo consistently stresses that the spread is within the ranks of our migrant workers and even blamed their socialising as a reason behind the spread.

With this kind of messaging, of course there will be people who will come to the misguided conclusion that it is our migrant labour that is responsible for the spread. As Teo puts the migrant workers in the centre of the spread, she negates to mention that her department had been aware of contagion as early as February but did nothing to contain it.

Whose fault is that? The migrant workers or MOM? She also negates to mention that they are forced to live in close proximity and are therefore unable to self-isolate appropriately. It is also important to remind people at this point that the government DID NOT initially provide any masks for the migrant workers.

While Shanmuggum is right to call this Lianhe Zaobao letter out, he should perhaps also call the members of his own government out for possibly contributing to this situation.

Also, if it were the independent media that had allowed such a letter to be published, what repercussions would they face?

Subscribe
Notify of
4 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

公积金局指经过三医生评估 认为沈佳泉仍可从事非体力劳动工作

此前,本社报导56岁的公民沈佳泉,基于心脏衰竭无法长时间工作,家中开支由妻子一力承担,且为了治疗用途,手上积蓄也所剩无几。故此沈佳泉希望能申请领出公积金,协助减轻家中负担。 沈佳泉以医疗理由提出申请,不过根据誌期8月29日的公积金局回函,指经过医生鉴定,认为他“并非丧失身体能力至无法工作”,因此无法受理他申请领出公积金的申请。他的公积金积蓄目前约有1万8千余元。 对此,公积金局也在昨日(22日)特别于官方脸书发文,指出沈佳泉的医生进行了两次个别的评估,认为他仍能就业,且适合一些不需要体力劳动的工作。 此外,当局称还找了两位医生评估沈佳泉的情况,也得出上述医生的结论,故此不符合以医疗理由领出公积金的条件。 不过,该局称国家心脏中心将和沈佳泉联系,如有必要可为他的医疗账单提供经济援助,同时也有社区伙伴在协助他。当局表示将与相关机构协助沈佳泉。 有关公积金局脸书贴文如下: 根据公积金局官网指出,公民只有在四种情况下,能透过医疗理由申请提取公积金,即申请者因为丧失身体或心智能力、或寿命严重受损、或永久性缺乏能力、获得了绝症,而无法工作。 此前,沈佳泉显示接受本社采访,指出自己在2014年开始身体出状况,经过医生检查发现心脏出现衰竭现象,动手术后,心脏功能仅余37巴仙, 且不能提重物,否则心脏会痛。“医生要我把一切都放慢下来,不能做太激烈的运动。” 他在手术的两年后,重新开始工作,也尝试了开私召车等兼职工作,但是因为心脏问题,也无法赚取过多收入。在2017年已停止工作。 仅靠妻子工作收入 经济拮据…

Apology – but still reaping the rewards

Ng E-Jay Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong apologized on Tuesday for government…

A matter of interpretation

The Law Society should use its skills for the public good. By Benjamin Cheah.

诉求有尊严的年长者护理服务

昨日,一名网民分享,岳父疑在疗养院未获妥善照料,以致病情恶化,即使向卫生部申诉要求调查,两年后也未有结果。 此事在社交媒体引起广泛回响。在我国将迈向人口老龄化,我们的乐龄群体,是否能享有妥善、可负担乃至有尊严的长期护理照顾,一直都是国民关心的课题。 这名网民王光祥的岳父不幸在今年8月离世,留下的不仅是亲人的思念,还有高昂医疗开销。 事实上,两个月前,也有报导指一名女儿入禀法庭,向救世军安乐之家疗养院索赔10万元。诉方指其百岁母亲在居住该疗养院的六年期间,身上多处受伤、无故跌倒,甚至让母亲下身只穿纸尿片坐在床上,不顾其尊严。 目前,住疗养院每月的开销预计介于1千200元至3千500元之间,中位数成本也在2千400元,也要依据长者的状况而定。 使用疗养院服务的年长者逾万人。在2020年,预计我国65岁以上人口将突破61万,到了2030年预计达到90万。显而易见,包括疗养院、居家或中心式看护等的长期护理服务的提升刻不容缓。 在本月10日,卫生部长颜金勇,在国会透过书面回答工人党非选区医院吴佩松,曾提及疗养院的看护服务,是针对那些需要更多照顾需求的体弱年长者,故此不适合拿疗养院的看护成本与居家看护对比。 他建议那些面对财务困难的民众,可联系医疗社工洽谈,或者动用保健基金(medifund)。 1700人参与居家个人看护计划 此外,目前有1千700明乐龄人士,参与居家个人看护(HPC)服务。他们接受日常起居的辅助,如沐浴和饮食,以及打扫起居、添购日用品,也陪老人进行锻炼身心活动。   居家个人看护服务在津贴前,收费平均为每小时23元,也取决于受照顾年长者的需求。符合条件者能获得80巴仙的津贴。若年长者有需求,居家看护服务提供者也能提供社区和财务支援。…