Photo: businesstimes.com.sg

Based on flash estimates from real estate portal SRX Property, the number of Singapore condominium units resold in March rose 17 per cent to 709 units from 606 units in February.
Even so, compared to last year, resale volume was 13 per cent less whereas resale volume was 21 per cent less from the five-year average volume in March.
From a regional perspective, 19.6 per cent of the month’s volume came from the core central region (CCR), 22.9 per cent from the rest of central region (RCR), and 57.5 per cent from the outside central region (OCR).
Due to deals that had been closed earlier this year or deals almost completing prior to the worsening of COVID-19 spread in late-March, these two factors led to increased sales, according to Christine Sun, who is the Head of Research and Consultancy of OrangeTee and Tie.
In March, resale prices rose 0.1 per cent from February while also increasing 0.4 per cent higher than the same period last year.
There was also a monthly rise in condo resale prices in March for OCR at 1.3 per cent, whereas RCR and CCR prices declined 1.7 per cent and 0.1 per cent each respectively.
From a year-on-year comparison, OCR and RCR prices fell 0.7 per cent and 0.8 per cent each respectively, whereas CCR prices increased 1 per cent.
The Ritz-Carlton Residences is the highest transacted price for a resale unit in March at S$10.5 million. Also, in OCR, a Flamingo Valley unit resold at S$3.3 million was the most expensive resale unit. On the other hand, in RCR a resale unit at Pebble Bay was the most expensive at S$4.4 million.
Compared to February, the overall transaction over X-value (TOX) remained flat at negative S$2,000 in March.
How much a buyer is underpaying (negative value) or overpaying (positive value) for a property based on SRX’s computer-generated market value is captured by the TOX value. Only districts with more than 10 resale transactions are included in the data.
The highest median TOX recorded is District 9 (Orchard and River Valley) at positive S$40,000, followed by District 8 (Farrer Park and Serangoon Road) at positive S$35,000.
District 20 (Ang Mo Kio, Bishan and Thomson) recorded the lowest median TOX at negative S$62,000, followed by District 15 (East Coast and Marine Parade) at negative S$30,000.
The figures in March have likely not reflected the impact from COVID-19 pandemic, Ms Sun pointed out.
March figures suggest the underlying strength of the local real estate market which would experience rising real estate prices and transaction volume robustly under normal circumstances, noted Nicholas Mak, who is ERA Realty’s Head of Research and Consultancy.
Mr Mak said that the company expects the resale volume this month to be a fraction of the usual monthly volume of 600 to 900 units.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

NS serviceman lost job offer due to reservist duties; MINDEF states that serviceman has unresolved disciplinary offence

A NS serviceman, Mervyn Chan Ping wrote a letter to The Straits…

要小贩营业超过12小时? 读者批社企“现代奴隶制”

从2015年开始,国内至少有七座小贩中心,以社会企业模式经营。 本地有114做小贩中心,在2027年前,还会增减13座小贩中心。不过根据卫生部兼环境及水源部高级政务部长许连碹博士,日前在拜访淡滨尼综合站小贩中心时,曾对媒体表示,未来是否会继续沿用社企模式,还有待评估。 早前有小贩反映,他们在这些社企经营的摊位,被征收附加费用,例如高达1千200元的中央清洗碗盘费。而一般社企小贩中心,管理层所征收的中央洗碗盘费用,约介于600-800元。 淡滨尼综合站小贩中心,也被誉为首个24小时营业的小贩中心。 事实上,就有读者在两年前,在咖啡店集团旗下子公司OTMH,于2016年11月正式接管淡滨尼小贩中心前,致函本社申诉,有关社企管理层对小贩们的要求,形同要落实“现代版的奴隶制”。 当时,有关读者有意申请该小贩中心摊位,于是联系社企OTMH公司,被告知业者需至少营业12个小时,最长24小时。 鼓励小贩经营超过12小时 这意味着,要实施现代咖啡店24小时不打烊概念,管理层可以要求摊主们拉长经营时间,也更倾向于把摊位租给愿意长时间工作的小贩,最好是能24小时、每周七天都营业。 读者认为,小贩和其他辛勤工作的新加坡人一样,也需要休息和休假,他们也要陪家人子女。压榨小贩们的劳动和时间,剥夺他们应有的休息,藉此最大化小贩中心的盈利。 该读者也质疑,为何审核小贩申请资格的不再是环境局,而全权交给有关社企公司。 他认为,完全由该公司自行决定而不是公开招标,有欠公平。这是因为小贩中心是用公款建设,政府才是拥有者,社会企业只是管理小贩中心的代理人。 “为何他们(指社企)可以被赋予如此多自由,在不公布遴选过程的情况下,来自行选择小贩?”…

罗拔申码头昨发生坠河事故 民众立即抛救生圈救女郎

罗拔申码头昨天(6月3日)傍晚约6时许,发生坠河事故,一名女郎被民众发现,在新加坡河河面载浮载沉,立即有人抛下救生圈,让女子捉住。 据目击者表示,较后民防人员赶到,把梯级伸入水中,并救起该名女子。她也被送往新加坡中央医院。

年初至11月 48起窗户脱落事故!建设、建屋局吁屋主定期检查

建设局与建屋发展局呼吁,若长年失修,可能导致窗户从建筑物上脱落,并提醒业主应半年进行一次维护。 今日当局联合发文表示,今年年初发生的窗户脱落事件是由于年久失修的原因,根据数据显示,截至11月前,已发生共48起窗户脱落事件,与去年49起事件的数据相似。 因此当局呼吁民众应定时检查窗户,一旦发生脱落事件,一经侦查后发现是常年失修的因素,业主将可能会被罚款最高10万元以上,或监禁一年,或两者兼施。 纵观几年,从2015年起就有35起;2016年上升至45起;2017年则达到56起。 建设局表示由于新加坡的建筑环境主要以高层建筑物为主,因此窗户脱落所造成的伤害风险是非常大。 文告也表示,今年48案件中,一半以上的窗户都涉及铝铆钉腐朽,当窗户零件随着时间推移而容易出现磨损情况,使得窗户变得松动,窗户既有脱落的风险。 因此自2004年以来,当局也明文规定要求将所有钉子换成不锈钢钉,若违法者,将可能被判入狱6个月,罚款最高5000元,或两者兼施。 此外,当局表示,滑动窗户也相对有风险。针对滑动窗户,经常因缺乏塞子或倾斜的角度,经常因业主打开或关闭窗户时,施加过多力道,导致窗口无法固定而脱落。 因此,当局建议业主应在每半年检查窗户零件,并定时为窗户加润滑油,必要时请于承包商联系修理,更换零件。 自2006年以来,已有352人因此被罚款,92人被起诉。