To help contain the spread of COVID-19 pandemic, Prime Minister Lee introduced a set of “circuit breaker” measures last Friday (3 April). The measures allow only deliveries and takeaways and forbid dine-ins at the country’s 4,800 restaurants from Tuesday (7 April) until Monday (4 May).
The government stated that it will absorb five percentage points of three food delivery platforms’ commission costs of around 20 to 40 per cent per order, throughout the period of the circuit breaker measures. This move is done to assist the F&B industry, which had a turnover of S$11.3 billion in 2019.
However, there are some restaurants which opted to stop operations, like Swee Kee Eating House at Amoy Street. Cedric Tang, the shop-owner said that it was “untenable” to keep the shop running through its self-service options from their CBD branch because the area is now empty of people.
Because there are too few residents in the CBD to support business, it would be meaningless to keep the shop open, as remarked by Mr Tang, who is the Director of Ka-Soh Restaurants, the group that operates the Cantonese family restaurant.
According to Mr Tang who has operated on the platforms, deliveries and takeaways revenue will be outstripped buy the expenses for food supplies, staff and rental costs.
“Taking 30 per cent out of each ticket leaves for very slim profit margins, if we have to rely solely on takeaways,” he commented due to the fact that between 28 per cent and 30 per cent is charged by delivery platforms on his orders. He added that deliveries and takeaways form only 20 per cent to 30 per cent of sales at Ka-Soh’s two other branches in Outram and Bukit Timah.
It would be unfair to ask the employees to learn how to use delivery apps overnight because most of them are seniors, Mr Tang also pointed out, being that he is the founder’s grandson.
Six workers have been transferred to the other two outlets whereas there workers at the Amoy Street branch are now on unpaid leave.
Another restaurant, Grain Traders has also shut down earlier this week as businesses cannot be sustained only with deliveries and takeaways, according to its General Manager, Joel Ong.
Mr Ong noted that delivery platforms only deliver within a 5km radius from the restaurant’s location and the lack of residential properties in the area mean that in-person and online orders would be few and far between.
Using islandwide delivery platforms such as Carpal and Lalamove will cost between S$10 and S$25 per trip, making it not a feasible option, Mr Ong added. Absorbing the delivery charge or passing it on to customers would be pointless because each customer pays an average of S$19 for each transaction, according to the last six months of sales.
The restaurant’s 15 workers are still paid their wages, although with pay cuts, Mr Ong pointed out.
Worries about the current situation also struck Deliveroo Editions, which is a restaurant with two delivery-focused outfits.
According to Pho Stop’s Co-Founder, Tomy Chen, deliveries only form 30 per cent of sales, whereas the Downtown Gallery’s dine-in spot provides 70 per cent of the remaining sales. The shop will be kept running for one week before Mr Chen decides whether to shut it down. Two of the 15 workers have been told to take annual leave, while the rest will be kept at Shenton Way branch or transferred.
Mr Chen has also forfeited his own wage “for the foreseeable future” so that payroll does not dry out. Capital has been injected by Mr Chen and the shareholders, which will hopefully allow the business to operate for at least five more months.
Anxious but grateful
The Parliament has announced several measures to ensure that jobs are protected and economy functioning. Measures such as the soon-to-be mandatory property tax rebate and the higher wage subsidy from 50 per cent to 75 per cent in April, will boost the F&B industry.
Restaurant operators have expressed their gratitude to the government for the help that they have provided through these measures thus far.
For example, Alexandre Lozachmeur will be able to pay his six workers their full wages with the help from the Jobs Support Scheme, even though his restaurant, Fleur De Sel will be closed for one month. Mr Lozachmeur will not be doing any takeaways or deliveries because he wants to ensure that his workers are “completely safe”.
“They are my family…I’m responsible for them. They have kids, they have families of their own,” he added. Mr Lozachmeur also expressed his thanks to his patrons, many of whom are regulars, for having their “last supper” at this restaurant to support it while they still could. He will forgo his wage for this month, as he already did for March, so that the business can last through April.
Mr Lozachmeur, and other restaurant operators are worried about the future. He opined that dine-in restrictions may still be in place even if the pandemic situation improves.
Rentals and remuneration make up more than half of restaurants’ business costs, based on the estimates of Singapore Department of Statistics in 2019.
Mr Chen stated that if the measures are not lifted, laying off some workers or putting them on unpaid leave may be the only solutions. Due to the weak economy since 2019, sales have consistently dropped, he pointed out. The figures dropped to 90 per cent from 85 per cent by the end of last month.
Delivery platforms will also experience tough competition as many establishments compete for orders, he further remarked.
According to Unlisted Collection CEO Loh Lik Peng, although measures by the government may be a lifeline for F&B businesses, the cashflow of many establishments remain affected because many landlords have yet to say that they will pass down the property tax rebates.
Mr Loh said that his company, which operates 18 restaurants, has not received confirmation from its landlords regarding when they will obtain their property tax rebates. F&B operators run on “single to low double-digit” profit margins, he added.
Rent reliefs are important as the industry urgently needs to pay their employees, Mr Loh stressed. The #savefnbsg movement on social media was also initiated by him.
The same sentiment is echoed by the Restaurant Association of Singapore (RAS), which has more than 450 members. RAS urged landlords to offer “timely and prompt support” by supplementing the tax rebates pass-down with two months of rental waivers.
For the coming six months, landlords should let the rentals to be in accordance with the grass turnover (GTO). RAS stated that the GTO for outlets in shopping malls is 15 per cent and non-malls to be 10 per cent.
“Our objectives are clear – to ensure business sustainability, prevent closure of businesses and loss of jobs in the F&B industry,” RAS assured.
As of now, there is not much that can be done by food operators but to wait for the restrictions to be removed eventually as well as the grants and subsidies to be dispensed. Many of them do not know what to do beyond May.
Mr Tang said that he would focus on “just taking it one step at a time.”
Mr Lozachmeur remarked that shutting down for one month is difficult to deal with, but he remains optimistic about the country-wide closure: “Hopefully everything gets better, then our business can slowly get back on track.”

Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like


工人党议员方荣发昨日(5月8日)于国会中询问,指《防止网络假消息与网络操纵》法案,赋予现任政府裁定假消息的绝对权力,其对选举结果的影响不能被低估。当权者能以“社会公众利益”之名,要求撤下来自政治对手的不利言论,甚至会对选举结果带来巨大的影响。 “政府也可能散播假消息” 方荣发说,“最大的恐惧是来自于一些人以现任政府的意向,故意做出了对事实的虚假陈述,来影响选举的结果,甚至是形塑公众舆论与观点。散播假消息者,也可能来自现任政府本身。那请问法案当中,是否有针对该情况提出相对应的方案或保障吗?” 他以2015的大选中举例,在竞选期最后一刻,人民行动党竞选机器向榜鹅东区选民发出信件,指该选区于2013年的一笔约2千250万元转账到工人党市镇会的款项,却不知去向,信中强调,该项声明是无可非议的事实。然而上述陈述却与每年的审计报告不符。 方荣发表示,显然该陈述被捏造出来,仅仅是为了影响2015年的选举结果。 方荣发也反问,《防假消息法》应如何起到保护作用,尤其是如果执政党在选举最后一刻散播假消息,媒体也照本宣科,届时也来不及向民众澄清事实。 他举例,若在大选期间,有内幕人对现任领导高层作出严重人身指控,并质疑他们的诚信与品格是否有资格带领国家。在《防假消息法》下,部长、主管机关、代理机关也可以公众利益之由,轻易将其撤下。 承上所诉,方荣发认为消息被撤下,但无人能说明究竟涉案部长和内幕人孰是孰非,到底谁才是在陈述事实。他也反问,《防假消息法》,是否也能被用来封锁、噤声这类能让选民知情、左右选民决定的资讯? 方荣发质问:新法能阻止执政政府散播假消息? 方荣发也向律政部长尚穆根追问,部长是否同意《防假消息法》,也无法避免现任政府涉及散播假消息以影响选举结果,就像上述提及的2015年大选发生的事件一样。 尚穆根则回应,《防假消息法》旨在对付那些可能动摇机构(institution)的假消息,至于那些可能影响行动党或工人党的假消息,无论是谁在散播,则不涵盖在《防假消息法》下,“可能可援引《防止骚扰法令》(POHA),而不是《防假消息法》(POFMA)”。 方荣发持续敦促法案应涵盖大选期间所散播的假消息。对此,尚穆根以“已给出最佳说法”,没有正面回应方荣发的提问。

BCA questioned on narrow corridors at Pasir Ris ONE

“How could the Building and Construction Authority have approved the plans if…

Singapore lives up to its friendly but law-abidingly stern demeanour, according to survey

According to a survey conducted in June 2018 among a sample of…


8岁美国德州网红男童莱恩(Ryan Kaji),再度蝉联视频网红“Youtuber”收入榜首,今年共进账2600万美元(约3500万新元)。 昨日《福布斯》公布2019年“Youtuber”收入榜单,莱恩以2600万美元再度蝉联冠军,去年他也以2200万美元,位列全球收入最高的网红。 莱恩频道是2015年由父母创立,当时他仅3岁,早期主要因拍摄“玩具开箱”影片爆红,他的频道“莱恩玩具评论”(Ryan ToysReview)。 部分视频更获得逾10亿人点击,莱恩在频道创立以来共累计了350亿次观看次数。 最近则因遭到消费者权益组织的投诉,改名“莱恩的世界“(Ryan’s World)成为儿童频道,在YouTube上订阅数超过2300万。 其主要的观众群为小学生,而视频内通常则以满满的欢笑与兴奋的尖叫吸引观众眼球,据悉,只要被莱恩介绍过的玩具都会被抢购一空。 莱恩的母亲为了能够专心在经营Youtube,甚至将工作辞去,在家里陪伴莱恩,当起网红妈妈。 除了Ryan’s World频道,莱恩更拥有自己的超过100多样产品的产品线,品项包含玩具、服装等各式商品。…