Teo Soh Lung in 2013 (Photo – Choon Hiong)

Lawyer and former ISA detainee Teo Soh Lung criticized mainstream media for giving the wrong impression to readers about the parliamentary debate on Wednesday (25 March) and indicated Senior Minister Teo Chee Hean’s explanations on the caretaker government as ‘talking nonsense’.

During the parliament on Wednesday, Mr Teo said it would be unconstitutional for the government to delay elections in the absence of a state of emergency and remarked the suggestion to form a caretaker government “shows a disregard for or a lack of understanding of the Constitution”.

Mr Teo said that in response to a question from Christopher de Souza, Holland-Bukit Timah GRC Member of Parliament (MP) on the Government’s stance regarding a proposal mooted by former presidential candidate and current Progress Singapore Party chief Tan Cheng Bock.

Dr Tan had suggested forming a caretaker government in the event if the COVID-19 situation in Singapore does not ease by April 2021.

“To suggest this shows a disregard for or a lack of understanding of the Constitution. Putting forward constitutionally unworkable proposals at a time of serious national crisis can only confuse and mislead Singaporeans to the detriment of Singapore and Singaporeans,” Mr Teo noted.

Following the parliament debate, lawyer Ms Teo took to Facebook earlier today (27 March) stating that the mainstream media had given people the wrong impression about the question raised by MP de Souza on the government’s stance on Dr Tan’s suggestion.

“I think it is dishonest and disgraceful for the mainstream media to cover a parliamentary debate in a manner that leaves people like me with a wrong impression. It should either report the question and answer fully or omit it completely,” Ms Teo wrote.

She added, “It should check a doubtful question, in this instance, the question raised by de Souza with the source i.e. Dr Tan himself.”

A number of reports from the mainstream media did not explain in detail what was Dr Tan’s actual suggestion made earlier on 21 March. Dr Tan had suggested in a Facebook video that the President could exercise her soft power to form a caretaker government comprising some of the current MPs and subsequently call for fresh elections when the COVID-19 crisis is resolved if the pandemic is dragged beyond 14 April 2021.

In view of that, Ms Teo urged people to look for alternative news and be cautioned of what is written on the mainstream media.

Meanwhile, she opined that the question raised by MP de Souza was to let Mr Teo to ‘belittle’ and accuse Dr Tan of ‘misleading people’, and enabled him to speak at length about the caretaker government.

“The misleading question (or misleading report) of MP de Souza also enabled the minister to give a long lecture on the Constitution, as if the PAP has any high regard for this document,” she asserted, adding that the PAP would not have amended the constitution so freely and frequently if the party has any regard for it.

She indicated Mr Teo’s explanation on the caretaker government as “talking nonsense” as the PAP has a supermajority in parliament to make laws.

“Minister Teo is really talking nonsense when he elaborates on caretaker governments. With the PAP super majority in parliament, it can make laws in a matter of hours or minutes and at its whims and fancies,” she said.

Ms Teo added, “There will never be a need for a caretaker government, at least not in my lifetime.”

Despite the COVID-19 pandemic and the surging number of infected cases in Singapore, Ms Teo said the senior minister still wants to hold a general election and gain a ‘clear mandate’ from the people.

“In other words, it does not want us, the people to criticise its work and the measures it takes to control the disease. It does not care about adding more burden to our overworked health care workers. It does not care about our well being,” she wrote.

Subscribe
Notify of
1 Comment
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Hong Kong police charge dozens of dissidents with security crime

by Jerome Taylor and Su Xinqi Hong Kong police charged dozens of…

【国会】到国会议事 全体议员受促戴口罩

如今,国会议员出席国会会议,除了在致词时可暂时脱除,其他时候都必须戴上口罩。 今日(4日)国会议长陈川仁宣布上述新举措,表示国会议员有责任在当前危机时刻,不论在国会殿堂内还是社区,都要起到引导表率的作用。 与此同时,由于阿裕尼集选区议员刘程强,因伤必须在加护病房静养,陈川仁也代表全体议员,慰问和祝愿后者早日康复。 总理李显龙是在4月3日,坦言政府重新思考对口罩的建议。而今民间已习惯和受敦促,到一些公共场合都应戴上口罩,保护自身和他人。 政府在4月14日宣布,即日起我国民众外出都必须戴口罩,否则将面对罚款甚至被控上法庭。

Temasek CEO argues against proposed approach to tackle climate change, says more data is required

Yesterday, the CEO of Temasek Holdings Ho Ching shared an article published…

多缴费、未评估开销是否合理 审计署批公用事业局水厂项目疏失

公用事业局委托一名承包商,建设海水淡化厂,2015年11月动工,2018年11月完工。承包商还需负责两年的服务和维修。 审计署检视这三份总值2亿2709万元的顾问、施工和维修保养服务合约。审计署发现,在该项目的施工合同变更管理上有疏失、调整价格变动疏失,以及未有评估维修合同中,非熟练技工费用成本是否合理。 在58项合同变更中,审计署发现,其中13项(价值459万元,或经审计变更总成本的53.9巴仙),是在施工开始、或完成的1至7个月后,才向有关当局申请批准! 还有12份合同变更(价值456万元),则是等到工程早已完成的5至7个月才来申请批准! 其中三项显著变更成本却未征求批准,涨幅高达23.9巴仙至59.1巴仙!这三份合同变更,最终成本价高达33万6800元,原本预估成本仅为25万6千元,但最终却暴涨31.6巴仙。 再者,未完成工作的成本也未被扣除,导致公用事业局多缴付了2万3200的款项。 根据公用事业局和承包商的施工合同,该局依据钢筋及混凝土材料的价格波动,每月支付给承包商。 到审计帐目时,针对钢筋和混凝土的价格波动,分别进行了104万7千元(增加)和82万0100元(扣除)的调整,且价格是由公共事业局委托的顾问决定的。 可是,审计署审查后,却发现一些价格调整,实则未有按合同条款作合适评估。八个建设结构中有七个的钢筋价格调整,使用不正确的价格指数,导致多付了将近11万3千元款项! 再有四个结构的没有进行价格调整,结果少支付了承包商达8千600元。 另一方面,公用事业局请承包商提供非熟练工友,协助水厂的运营。然而审计署认为,这笔员工开销似乎太高且该局没有对价格是否合理作评估,未能让公帑发挥所值。 这笔费用高达60万7千元。但审计署指出,若根据竞标各承包商报价推算,平均这些非熟练员工开销也仅为36万5400元,远远低了39.8巴仙。…