In a joint statement earlier today (20 March), the Asian Forum for Human Rights and Development (FORUM-ASIA), together with the Solidarity for ASEAN Peoples’ Advocacy and the undersigned organisations, expressed grave concerns with the lack of a human rights focus in the current response to the ongoing COVID‐19 pandemic by the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) Members States.

As such, they call upon ASEAN Member States to place human rights and dignity as the core principles in addressing the pandemic, specifically by ensuring that any public health measures are taken in alignment with international human rights law and standards to ensure accountability and transparency in the handling of the situation.

They noted that is alarming that many ASEAN Member States have yet to adopt a clear communications strategy to inform the public on the situation, three months after the COVID‐19 outbreak. This notion was made following observation that ASEAN countries such as Indonesia, Myanmar, Laos, and the Philippines have delayed or limit the release of information to preserve their image.

Besides that, Myanmar, Thailand, and Singapore are actively use repressive laws such as national anti‐fake news laws to pursue misinformation, although this ultimately failed to quell public fear or doubt. According to the statement, this high‐handed approach risks public health and welfare, particularly for those with limited access to information and education. It mutes peoples’ legitimate expressions of doubt and query on the actual situation in their country and inspires more speculation and misinformation on the COVID‐19 situation in‐country.

Meanwhile, in Indonesia, President Joko Widodo initially encouraged international and local travel by providing
incentives for local tourism, while later admitting that the Government intentionally hid information related to the areas that are contacted with COVID‐19 amidst fear of public uproar.

This lack of transparency from the Indonesia’s Health Ministry and its Government is also documented in the Philippines. Both the Governments of Singapore and Myanmar have expressed the intention to impose their anti‐fake news provisions in their laws to control the information.

In Thailand, amidst public concern over the actual number of confirmed COVID‐19 cases, the authorities implied that presenting false information online related to COVID‐19 could fall under the offense of the Computer Crime Act.

More worryingly, no cases have yet to be reported from Laos and Myanmar, raising serious concerns about lack of testing or reporting, and consequent lack of pandemic preparedness.

As several countries including Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand, Philippines, and Indonesia have tightened border controls and imposed forms of lock‐downs, FORUM-ASIA and many other NGOs are increasingly concerned that governments may use excessive force, militarisation, or other abuses of power in implementing these measures.

This becomes particularly concerning as uniformed forces are deployed without adequate training and due oversight when implementing these heightened control measures and the fact that most of ASEAN member states have authoritarian or partial‐democracy governments.

For example, in the Philippines on 15 March 2020, on the first day of the quarantine in Metro Manila, several individuals reported corruption and intimidation by the police. The expansion of quarantine to an ‘enhanced community quarantine’ level throughout Luzon, the largest and most populous island in the Philippines, also poses concern as access to transportation, food security, and essential healthcare facilities will be heavily restricted.

Meanwhile, the Government of Indonesia deployed its National Intelligence Agency to help monitor the situation, instead of relying on medical experts.

“Without an independent body to conduct monitoring and coordination of and among governmental bodies, potential violations and abuses of human rights including the right to access to healthcare, right to freedom of movement, right to personal security, right to privacy, and right to non‐penalisation for lack of documentation, is high,” said the NGOs in their statement.

“We are further concerned with the lack of preparedness and the inadequacy of healthcare systems and facilities in the region to address the COVID‐19 situation,” they added.

Despite governments’ insistence that their health protocols have met the World Health Organisation standards, sufficient access to testing and treatment as well as protection equipment are often only available in major hospitals in major cities in the region, without realistic solutions provided for the rest.

This situation threatens healthcare and social workers, who are at the frontline of the battle, as they are left vulnerable with a high risk of contamination due to the lack of protection protocols and safety equipment.

Additionally, the NGO also highlighted how the pandemic response further reinforces existing inequalities faced by vulnerable populations, particularly informal workers, migrant workers, as well as rural, elderly, indigenous, LGBTIQ, people with disabilities, and refugee communities. Refugees and other underground populations face unique vulnerabilities linked to risks posed by engaging authorities.

Mitigating these risks will be critical to stemming COVID‐19 spread. Meanwhile, women and girls are experiencing challenges as the burden to conduct unpaid care work for their family members, especially the sick, increases. Furthermore, incidents of domestic and intimate partner violence can likely increase during strict quarantines while services and facilities that aim at addressing domestic and gender‐based violence are disrupted due to COVID‐19 response procedure.

About 70% ASEAN’s workforce come from the informal sector, including part‐time informal workers, and workers in the ‘gig’ economy. Many are daily wage earners and/or coming from marginalised communities. These workers will have their livelihood severely affected from pandemic response measures.

Hence, states must provide a social protection net that mitigates the impact on all of those affected by the COVID‐19 pandemic without exception and without discrimination.

“They should also implement measures such as the universal work from home and covered‐leave policy, as well as contingency and compensation during the quarantine”, remarked the NGOs, while criticising businesses that still demand staff to report physically to work despite known risks or by imposing unpaid leave for several months.

Ultimately, the NGOs, in their statement, reiterated the importance of human rights and dignity as core principles in combating this global pandemic.

They noted with disappointment that these principles are not underscored in the commitment of ASEAN health sectors to further review and assess the enhanced cooperation in regional preparedness, response strategies, and countermeasures by utilising the ASEAN Plus Three Health Cooperation.

It is further disappointing to see that the disparate display of measures by the individual ASEAN Member States showed the lack of a coherent and coordinated ASEAN approach in managing the impact of the pandemic to the region.

Therefore, the NGOs call upon ASEAN Member States to practise the following measures:

  • Respect human rights, fundamental freedoms, and human dignity as well as to abide with international human rights standards and principles when implementing measures to address the COVID‐19 pandemic
  • Provide free and high quality tests, treatment, and care to all people affected by the pandemic, including marginalized groups and undocumented populations
  • Provide temporary and safe shelter during enforced quarantines for the homeless and other vulnerable communities
  • Facilitate regular and transparent access to accurate, timely, and comprehensive information to the public regarding the disease, including the risk of transmission, prevention, and governmental efforts to address the situation
  • Ensure that all employers, including public institutions and private companies and businesses, provide adequate compensation to all employees affected by the pandemic
  • Generate a timely response accessible to all people, including those who have limited access to healthcare facilities
  • Provide holistic measures, through law, policy, and practice, to uphold and ensure workers’ and migrant workers’ rights, welfare, safety, and security, regardless of legal status, in response to the COVID‐19 threat
  • Encourage all national human rights institutions to monitor the human rights impact their State’s measures together with civil society
  • Ensure that full access to social and protection mechanisms, including access to justice for women and girls must not cease at this time of quarantines.
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

That alcohol ban poll – can I even say “No”?

When the Ministry of Home Affairs tabled a bill to impose an…

Abolitionism not only about dismantling prison complex, but investing more in resources for marginalised communities: Legal professional and writer

The concept of prison abolitionism is not simply about tearing down the…

Senior citizens’ return to workforce becoming “a norm” in Singapore’s ageing population: Reuters

In order to cope with rising living costs, an increasing number of…

民调反映经济放缓中 就业市场前景现恶化隐忧

由于中美贸易战带来的冲击,造成贸易与制造业的下滑,也让我国经济面临全球的放缓压力,而深受影响的劳动力市场也正开始受到影响。 尽管日前金管局曾表示,对未来几个季度的经济可能出现复苏持有乐观的态度,但根据《彭博社》bao’dao报导,有些迹象表明我国的就业前景仍不理想,如裁员人数正在提升,企业对于加薪的态度也相对谨慎,而失业的人愈来愈难找到新的工作。 据万宝盛华(ManpowerGroup)上月调查显示,在669个人事经理中,对今年最后三个月的就业前景持有最悲观的态度。数据也显示,在第四季度中,认为“员工人数会增加的人事经理”与“预测员工人数减少的人事经理”,仅差五个百分点。 金英证卷研究部的经济学家 Lee Ju Ye表示,其中以制造业的表现力最弱,很可能是受到中美贸易战的重挫,而让其表现力不佳。 针对职缺与失业比例,有数据显示在第二季度中自2017年底以来,首次跌破1。换言之,我国的失业人数已超过职缺的比例。对此,星展集团驻新加坡资深经济学家谢光威表示,“职缺与失业比例对我而言至关重要,显然它已降至均等,表示劳动力市场正在走软。” 此外,目前平均月收入的增长达2.1巴仙,亦是2017年初以来的最低水平。 另一方面,彭博社指出,我国失业率尽管在过去几个季度内一直在上升,但仍低于衰退后的峰值,尤其是近两年内均出现季度下降。再根据上周所公布的调查显示,经三个月的放缓后,第三季度的裁员人数攀升至2900人,其中损失最大的即是服务业,而制造业与建筑业也同时出现了裁员现象。 PMET成市场“弱势群体” 其中最令人感到担忧的是,PMET的解雇率是否会在本季度再次攀升。谢光耀表示,“在众多行业中,最值得关注的反而是PMET的解雇率,因为他们是市场上最脆弱的一员。这反而是与传统观念背道而驰,因为在众人会误以为低工资的工人才是解雇的对象,但显然在新加坡并非如此。”…