In response to the debate on the omission of former national swimmer Joscelin Yeo’s name in the Singapore’s Sport Hall of Fame (HOF) recently, Sport Singapore (SportSG) said it will improve its nomination and selection process for a place in the HOF, indicating Yeo’s swimming and service record as “noteworthy”.

The HOF was built to honour the nation’s top athletes who have contributed and represented the nation for years. It has 58 inductees including swimmers Patricia Chan and Joseph Schooling, sprinter C.Kunalan, and footballer Fandi Ahmad since its establishment in 1985.

Despite Ms Yeo’s achievements in winning 40 gold medals at the Southeast Asia (SEA) Games in her 17-year swimming career and was named Sportswoman of the Year in 1993, 1995, and 1999, her name was not included in the HOF. This has sparked a debate within the sporting fraternity.

Former Singapore Swimming Association (SSA) vice president Jose Raymond was first to raise the issue on Facebook on 15 January, citing Ms Yeo’s contributions in the nation’s swimming fraternity should have earned her a place in the HOF.

“As a journalist, I watched Joscelin win gold after gold for Singapore, sometimes in the face of fierce personal adversity,” he noted. “That she is still not in the Sport Hall of Fame somewhat baffles.”

The issue was later brought up again by veteran journalist Godfrey Robert in a column in the Business Times on 29 February, which he remarked that Ms Yeo should be an easy pick to go into the HOF due to her impressive credentials.

“Her omission is baffling, to say the least.,” he asserted. “It would be good for Sport Singapore – the government’s lead sports agency under the Ministry of Culture, Community and Youth – to enlighten us, and the SNOC and SSA should also put in a strong word for Yeo too.”

Following the debate, SportSG said that it will improve the nomination and selection process for a place in the HOF particularly to widen the extent of stakeholder or public consultation, adding that it was “heartened to see the sustained interest and the lively discussions that have emerged”, The Straits Times reported.

According to SportSG, nominated athletes will be evaluated thoroughly on the merits of their past athletic performance, character, and contribution to sporting the nation.

“Views from sporting and non-sporting fraternity are sought as input to Committee deliberations,” SportSG noted. “The Committee then arrives at a consensus on the athletes’ worthiness and timing for induction into the HOF.”

“While all deserving athletes will be considered for the HOF inductions, the timing will vary,” it added.

SportSG also highlighted the two pathways to enter the HOF. The first is by winning at major Games and contributions to the sport – gold medallists at Asian Games, Commonwealth Games, and World Championship level who fulfil eight years of service to the sport are considered. While Olympic medallists are exempted from this requirement.

The HOF committee will also assess the suitability of candidates as all-rounded athletes and role models.

The second pathway is whether an athlete has attained “icon” status, described as “a role model in character and values”, and instilled national pride among Singaporeans.

Meanwhile, Ms Yeo seems to be nonchalant of the omission of her name in the HOF as her goal in competing for Singapore was never to be in the HOF.

“My goal was always to be the best swimmer I could be for my country, my family, myself,” she said. “The results are a byproduct of that, and if the powers that be feel that it does not meet the standard of being in the hall of fame, that’s their call.”

She hinted that the omission of her name in the HOF will not hinder her from continuing to work with SportSG or the Singapore National Olympic Council (SNOC).

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

SMRT CEO paid $2.2m to $2.5m – a multifold jump in three years?

The pay of the chief executive officer (CEO) of the Singapore Mass…

Singapore performs poorly in two separate global polls on workplace diversity and inclusion

Singapore is among the worse countries in the world in terms of…

Straits Times highlights how SG govt helps PR family unite with child stuck in Johor

It was reported on Straits Times (ST) today that Singapore has brought…

“来单挑啊” 醉汉飙脏话挑衅巴士乘客

近日,一段醉汉与巴士乘客吵架的视频疯传网络。醉汉被拍到不知何故对着巴士上的一名乘客破口大骂,甚至还挑衅要单挑巴士乘客,两人在巴士上以粗俗的语言争吵。 该视频于昨日(19日)被上载到脸书网站Singapore Bus Drivers Community,并写下“醉汉试图在巴士上寻衅,要与巴士乘客单挑”,然而却无法得知争吵的缘由和发生地点。 视频约3分半左右,内容可见醉汉身穿黑衣与牛仔裤,试图在挑衅与一名坐在座位上的乘客打架。该名乘客身穿栗色T-恤,头上还带了一顶黑色帽子。视频一开始,醉汉就向乘客叫嚣并挑衅要打架,乘客则表示,“你已经醉了“。黑衣醉汉辩称他没醉,更开始向乘客大叫,”每个人都有自己的问题,你有自己的问题,我也有,所以你是错的(salah)。 乘客随后便反击他没错,而一旁的醉汉则不停在指责乘客并且开始以脏话回应 “F*** you”,两人便开始互相以脏话对嘛,然后往巴士后边走去,期间醉汉仍继续挑衅乘客单挑。后来,视频内容切换到,黑衣醉汉直站在乘客前面,两人互相以脏话叫嚣,火爆气氛升级,完全不避讳巴士上的其他乘客。 经过一番争执后,醉汉似乎要对乘客动手,被乘客喝止,“不要碰我,你可以和我说话,可是不要碰我!”。醉汉却不依不挠,他不停对乘客指手画脚,最终乘客忍无可忍站起来,眼看冲突等级加深,其他乘客便介入连任之间的冲突,将他们分开。 蓝衣男子介入两人的纷争,劝导醉汉往后退一步,试图将两人分开,而巴士也随之停下,醉汉仍不依不挠,不停对着乘客叫嚣,叫他一起来单挑。不久,醉汉在叫嚣中下车,闹剧才收场。 视频上传后,已有1500次分享,不少网友留言发生争执时,司机应该出面制止纷争,也有网友留言认为黑衣醉汉的行为是不良行为。…