Connect with us

Current Affairs

为治病妻花光积蓄 中国男子冀筹医疗费用助回国治疗

Published

on

中国籍女子因严重疾病目前于我国就医,却因昂贵的医疗费用,花光积蓄。其丈夫为救妻子,向公众筹款,希望能筹集资金,待妻子病况较稳定助她回中国治疗。

网络募捐平台Give Asia日前分享,一对中国籍夫妇在我国工作,而其妻子雯冰(译名)于2020年初被诊断患有严重型再生不良性贫血(severe aplastic anemia)和肺结核,病况复杂。丈夫表示,在接受严重型再生不良性贫血的治疗前,医院必须先控制他体内的肺结核。经治疗后情况稳定下,她出院继续治疗肺结核。

不料在出院后,她开始发烧到40度,于是在2月1日再度回到医院治疗,并被诊断为严重肺炎。

丈夫指出,经过几天的抗生素治疗后,却不见好转,反而是他的氧气饱和度也逐渐下降,甚至需要仰赖呼吸机支撑,于2月10日进入重症监护室(ICU)。

然而,随之而来的并不只是妻子状况不见好转,医疗费用也逐渐暴增。由于两人并非我国公民,因此无法享有任何医疗福利。其医疗费用从两万余元累计到19万余元。丈夫表示,在妻子入院之际,他们已经支付了一万余元,但随着情况不见好转,他们必须再支付至少13万5千元的押金。

“医疗费用不断上涨成为了雯冰、我以及家人的压力来源,也因此,让雯冰只同意某些治疗程序”,丈夫表示。

因疫情影响滞留新加坡

截至目前,丈夫表示他们已经将耗尽近6万元,而剩下的钱也会用其支付住院费用。由于在新加坡治疗严重型再生不良性贫血相当昂贵,因此两人也希望,能够回到中国继续治疗。然而,近期因武汉冠状病毒的肆虐,让他们只能滞留在新加坡继续接受治疗,但却也要继续承担昂贵的医疗费用。

因此他们也希望透过筹款,除了可以减轻在新加坡接受治疗的负担,也希望能够让妻子可以安然回到中国继续治疗。

岳父寄来10万新元

丈夫也叙述雯冰的家庭情况,去年雯冰父亲也出现中风的情况,目前仍在恢复中。他是家里唯一的经济支柱,目前仍有一名19岁的弟弟在上高中。虽然如此,她父亲在接到雯冰生病的消息后,仍立即将所有的积蓄寄给雯冰,共50万人民币(约10万新元),希望能够借此救她的女儿,但以目前的情况来看,仍然是杯水车薪。

对于妻子,其丈夫形容雯冰是一名善良而热情的人,由于过去两年并未能在新加坡找到工作,于是她决定开始在网上写博客并在“小红书”上分享自己的旅游知识。她甚至在进入重症监护室前,还计划若能够康复,他也准备要参与慈善活动,帮助其他人。

家属无法前来

至于她在中国的家人,由于武汉冠状病毒的肆虐,他们也无法飞到新加坡照顾,只有在遥远的家乡持续担心妻子的情况,每日仅能依靠视频通话,为女儿加油打气。

丈夫也相当悲痛万分,“当我第一次见到她戴上呼吸器时,真的无法形容我到底有多悲伤,她才29岁,为什么会被疾病找上门?”

为此,丈夫也希望透过众筹,为妻子筹集一点医药费,所有的募集资金将由Give.Asia一并处理,并直接支付给中央医院,作为雯冰的医疗费用。

民众也可以透过网络募捐平台Give Asia网站,前去给雯冰捐款。根据该网的募捐信息,募款目标为20万新元,至截稿为止已筹得7万9330元。

Continue Reading

Current Affairs

TJC issued 3rd POFMA order under Minister K Shanmugam for alleged falsehoods

The Transformative Justice Collective (TJC) was issued its third POFMA correction order on 5 October 2024 under the direction of Minister K Shanmugam for alleged falsehoods about death penalty processes. TJC has rejected the government’s claims, describing POFMA as a tool to suppress dissent.

Published

on

The Transformative Justice Collective (TJC), an advocacy group opposed to the death penalty, was issued its third Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act (POFMA) correction direction on 5 October 2024.

The correction was ordered by Minister for Home Affairs and Law, K Shanmugam, following TJC’s publication of what the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) alleges to be false information regarding Singapore’s death row procedures and the prosecution of drug trafficking cases.

These statements were made on TJC’s website and across its social media platforms, including Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, and X (formerly Twitter).

In addition to TJC, civil activist Kokila Annamalai was also issued a correction direction by the minister over posts she made on Facebook and X between 4 and 5 October 2024.

According to MHA, these posts echoed similar views on the death penalty and the legal procedures for drug-related offences, and contained statements that the ministry claims are false concerning the treatment of death row prisoners and the state’s legal responsibilities in drug trafficking cases.

MHA stated that the posts suggested the government schedules and stays executions arbitrarily, without due regard to legal processes, and that the state does not bear the burden of proving drug trafficking charges.

However, these alleged falsehoods are contested by MHA, which maintains that the government strictly follows legal procedures, scheduling executions only after all legal avenues have been exhausted, and that the state always carries the burden of proof in such cases.

In its official release, MHA emphasised, “The prosecution always bears the legal burden of proving its case beyond a reasonable doubt, and this applies to all criminal offences, including drug trafficking.”

It also pointed to an article on the government fact-checking site Factually to provide further clarification on the issues raised.

As a result of these allegations, both TJC and Annamalai are now required to post correction notices. TJC must display these corrections on its website and social media platforms, while Annamalai is required to carry similar notices on her Facebook and X posts.

TikTok has also been issued a targeted correction direction, requiring the platform to communicate the correction to all Singapore-based users who viewed the related TJC post.

In a statement following the issuance of the correction direction, TJC strongly rejected the government’s claims. The group criticised the POFMA law, calling it a “political weapon used to crush dissent,” and argued that the order was more about the exercise of state power than the pursuit of truth. “We have put up the Correction Directions not because we accept any of what the government asserts, but because of the grossly unjust terms of the POFMA law,” TJC stated.

TJC further argued that the government’s control over Singapore’s media landscape enables it to push pro-death penalty views without opposition. The group also stated that it would not engage in prolonged legal battles over the POFMA correction orders, opting to focus on its abolitionist work instead.

This marks the third time TJC has been subject to a POFMA correction direction in recent months.

The group was previously issued two orders in August 2024 for making similar statements concerning death row prisoners.

In its latest statement, MHA noted that despite being corrected previously, TJC had repeated what the ministry views as falsehoods.

MHA also criticised TJC for presenting the perspective of a convicted drug trafficker without acknowledging the harm caused to victims of drug abuse.

Annamalai, a prominent civil rights activist, is also known for her involvement in various social justice campaigns. She was charged in June 2024 for her participation in a pro-Palestinian procession near the Istana. Her posts, now subject to correction, contained information similar to those presented by TJC regarding death penalty procedures and drug-related cases.

POFMA, which was introduced in 2019, allows the government to issue correction directions when it deems falsehoods are being spread online.

Critics of the law argue that it can be used to suppress dissent, while the government asserts that it is a necessary tool for combating misinformation. The law has been frequently invoked against opposition politicians and activists.

As of October 2024, Minister K Shanmugam has issued 17 POFMA directions, more than any other minister. Shanmugam, who was instrumental in introducing POFMA, is followed by National Development Minister Desmond Lee, who has issued 10 POFMA directions.

Major media outlets, including The Straits Times, Channel News Asia, and Mothership, have covered the POFMA directions. However, as of the time of writing, none have included TJC’s response rejecting the government’s allegations.

Continue Reading

Current Affairs

Hotel Properties Limited suspends trading ahead of Ong Beng Seng’s court hearing

Hotel Properties Limited (HPL), co-founded by Mr Ong Beng Seng, has halted trading ahead of his court appearance today (4 October). The announcement was made by HPL’s company secretary at about 7.45am, citing a pending release of an announcement. Mr Ong faces one charge of abetting a public servant in obtaining gifts and another charge of obstruction of justice. He is due in court at 2.30pm.

Published

on

SINGAPORE: Hotel Properties Limited (HPL), the property and hotel developer co-founded by Mr Ong Beng Seng, has requested a trading halt ahead of the Singapore tycoon’s scheduled court appearance today (4 October) afternoon.

This announcement was made by HPL’s company secretary at approximately 7.45am, stating that the halt was due to a pending release of an announcement.

Mr Ong, who serves as HPL’s managing director and controlling shareholder, faces one charge under Section 165, accused of abetting a public servant in obtaining gifts, as well as one charge of obstruction of justice.

He is set to appear in court at 2.30pm on 4 October.

Ong’s charges stem from his involvement in a high-profile corruption case linked to former Singaporean transport minister S Iswaran.

The 80-year-old businessman was named in Iswaran’s initial graft charges earlier this year.

These charges alleged that Iswaran had corruptly received valuable gifts from Ong, including tickets to the 2022 Singapore Formula 1 Grand Prix, flights, and a hotel stay in Doha.

These gifts were allegedly provided to advance Ong’s business interests, particularly in securing contracts with the Singapore Tourism Board for the Singapore GP and the ABBA Voyage virtual concert.

Although Iswaran no longer faces the original corruption charges, the prosecution amended them to lesser charges under Section 165.

Iswaran pleaded guilty on 24 September, 2024, to four counts under this section, which covered over S$400,000 worth of gifts, including flight tickets, sports event access, and luxury items like whisky and wines.

Additionally, he faced one count of obstructing justice for repaying Ong for a Doha-Singapore flight shortly before the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB) became involved.

On 3 October, Iswaran was sentenced to one year in jail by presiding judge Justice Vincent Hoong.

The prosecution had sought a sentence of six to seven months for all charges, while the defence had asked for a significantly reduced sentence of no more than eight weeks.

Ong, a Malaysian national based in Singapore, was arrested by CPIB in July 2023 and released on bail shortly thereafter. Although no charges were initially filed against him, Ong’s involvement in the case intensified following Iswaran’s guilty plea.

The Attorney-General’s Chambers (AGC) had earlier indicated that it would soon make a decision regarding Ong’s legal standing, which has now led to the current charges.

According to the statement of facts read during Iswaran’s conviction, Ong’s case came to light as part of a broader investigation into his associates, which revealed Iswaran’s use of Ong’s private jet for a flight from Singapore to Doha in December 2022.

CPIB investigators uncovered the flight manifest and seized the document.

Upon learning that the flight records had been obtained, Ong contacted Iswaran, advising him to arrange for Singapore GP to bill him for the flight.

Iswaran subsequently paid Singapore GP S$5,700 for the Doha-Singapore business class flight in May 2023, forming the basis of his obstruction of justice charge.

Mr Ong is recognised as the figure who brought Formula One to Singapore in 2008, marking the first night race in the sport’s history.

He holds the rights to the Singapore Grand Prix. Iswaran was the chairman of the F1 steering committee and acted as the chief negotiator with Singapore GP on business matters concerning the race.

 

Continue Reading

Trending