The Management of Ngee Ann City cordoned off a floor in Tower A after a confirmed case of coronavirus (Covid-19) was reported from the office building of Tower A.

The case is the 77th coronavirus case being reported in Singapore.

The Management circulated a note to inform its tenants about the case on 17 February, the same day as when the security was alerted with the case at around 12 pm.

Today Online reported that the infected individual – a 35-year-old man – is an employee of DBS Bank who works in the bank’s satellite office at Ngee Ann City, he is also the second employee from the bank to be infected with Covid-19.

A spokesperson from DBS Bank said the employee was in close contact with the bank’s first coronavirus case, which involved a 62-year-old employee.

He was placed under quarantine since last week before being diagnosed with the virus, DBS Bank added.

Meanwhile, Ngee Ann City’s management said the affected office space and floor in Tower A have been cordoned off, while the common areas such as lifts and toilets are being deep cleaned and disinfected in accordance with Ministry of Health guidelines.

“We have immediately cordoned off the area where he worked and have initiated a serious of deep cleaning process in the immediate areas as well as common areas where the case was last seen,” Ngee Ann City’s management said in its note to tenants.

Last Wednesday (12 February), about 300 employees of DBS Bank were evacuated from their office on the 43rd floor of Tower 3 at Marina Bay Financial Centre after a 62-year-old employee was confirmed to be infected with the novel coronavirus (Covid-19).

“We are rendering every support to him and his family during this period. We have also identified those who were in close contact with him, and are taking the same precautions as we did with the first case,” said the DBS spokesperson.

The bank said it will continue to monitor the situation to ensure their employees’ and customers’ health and well-being.

“We have a framework for contact tracing, which we execute through a mix of physical interviews and data analytics. Through this, we are able to contact trace up to three degrees of separation,” the spokesperson added.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Malaysian grassroots group uses own money to fix potholes as authorities are too slow

As authorities were taking too long to fix potholes on roads, a…

侵扰行为“不属可逮捕性质”警无能为力 “地狱”邻居吓走六户人家

《海峡时报星期刊》今日报导,在榜鹅中心一座组屋楼层,出现“来自地狱的邻居”,她被指往邻居家门泼油、开大音乐声量和猛跺地板,甚至有邻居指她留了带血的猪耳在鞋架上。 至少有六户人家不堪这位邻居骚扰,而纷纷搬离该楼层。 这些住户也不是没有报警,但是警方却告知,这位51岁妇人“恶邻”的所为,不属于可被逮捕的性质。 其中一家在去年二月搬离的住户,更因为倍受压力,而向建屋发展局申请五年期限前卖掉组屋,惟被当局拒绝。“我无法再忍受了,放工回到家就会发现门前洒了一些液体,有时是食用油,有时是粥,最糟糕的是有次我在我的鞋架上发现猪耳!” 该住户反映这还是他买的首间组屋,只能自认倒霉,而且其他住户也争相想远离“恶邻”。 属黄志明议员选区 据了解,该选区属黄志明议员的选区。其中一位邻居还向记者展示17份报案纸,还向建屋局、议员和居民委员会投诉。 被指恶邻的51岁妇人已离婚,在2013年和儿子入住该楼层的两房式组屋单位。 居委会发言人则在电邮中回复记者,指“居委会志工知悉上述情况,也和有关住户接洽,居委会还会继续和相关机构合作以协助排解争议。” 而警方则表示,住户举报该“恶邻”,惟她的行为如刻意骚扰、噪音污染和恶作剧,都不算可逮捕性质的犯错,为此建议受影响的邻居申请推事投诉(Magistrate’s Complaints)。 其中一户住在妇人楼上的邻居,就因为先前调解不成,只得申请推事投诉。他反映妇人投诉他们组屋在上个月传出噪音,为此还被妇人拿一块大石头吓阻。…

中国籍女子不满判决 对法官出言不逊被判入狱三周

因不满家事法庭所判的结果,一名女子出言羞辱并威胁地方法官,被地方法院判入狱三周。 据《雅虎新闻》报道指出,该名女子为37岁中国籍女子张红红(译音),获得新加坡永久居留权,当时由于不满意离婚诉讼的结果,因此出言侮辱法官,称他为“婊子”,并威胁会打法官。 法官予以女子有条件的严厉警告,但随后在不到一年期间,再次侮辱法官,指责法官“品行愚蠢”,以及称法官与前夫有“勾结”。 上周五(27日),地方法院指控她涉嫌《防止骚扰法》,她承认相关罪行,因此获判三周监禁。 此外,她也涉嫌另一项对公务员出言不逊的指控,正在审判中。 案发经过 事发当时,女子与她的42岁新加坡籍前夫正在进行离婚诉讼,而且进行审判的是另有其人,并非受害者本身。 2017年8月25日,受害者中途接手案件,而且由受害者宣读有关婚姻财产分割、赡养费与孩子的审判。然而,女子对其结果并不满意 2017年11月,女子再次上诉,要求法官改变审判结果,法官分别在12月11日与22日召开聆讯。 据悉,女子对于前夫没有支付赡养费感到相当沮丧,认为家事法院并没有给予她足够的协助,感到愤怒。 2017年12月15日,女子在网上递交传票申请,并附上了一份宣誓书,控诉离最终判决已经超过一年,但仍未见前夫支付孩子的学费。 她也在宣誓书上表示,若家事法院未能在22日当天为她解决,她将会破坏法院以及殴打审判法官(即指受害者),并斥责受害者为婊子。…

抨击现有公共组屋政策 半辈子供房  最后一无所有

针对近期总理李显龙在国庆群众大会上,宣称将确保提供国人可负担的公共组屋、医疗服务和教育,让国人无需担心。 不过,在总理宣布了数项新政策后,仍令一些网民感到失望。 网民Calvin Goh认为现有公共住宅政策根本就不是“可负担”,我们几乎花大半辈子,把大部分积蓄花在上面,但是到最后,缺什么也不能传承给下一代。 “当你买下组屋并偿还房贷好些年,房子应该属于你的。但在新加坡,到最后房子却不属于你的。你只是偿还房租和长期住在那间组屋。供了这么多年房贷,但最后好多人还是一无所有,什么也不能传承给子孙后代。” 他提问:究竟新加坡属于谁的?国人的存在,是否就只是为了还房贷和贡献给政府?我们究竟是为了谁打拼? 公共住宅理应负担得起 我指的是公共组屋,或者公共住宅。至于私有产业不管是永久屋契还是租赁权,都属私人“拥有”,开放给本地或外国人购买(设定一些条规限定只有国人能购买土地财产),又或者较少法规限制。 他认为,建屋发展局的公共住宅,理应让民众负担得起或真正拥屋。但实际上只要看看售屋合同,就很明白所谓屋主其实都只是租户。 公共住宅理应让人民有瓦遮头,不应让国人对房屋产权有其他的猜测。“我不认为用20-40年偿还公共组屋房贷是可负担的。真正的可负担,指的是国人只需要数年时间,即5至10年就可清还所有房贷。” 如此,在清还房贷之后,国人才有余钱储蓄,或追求其他梦想。 但是,在现有制度下,国人几乎大部分收入都花在房贷,可是一旦屋契到期,价值归零。形同公积金一样,所有的价值只能看,却用不了。…