In her latest Facebook post posted on late Wednesday afternoon, Dr Lee Weiling charged that Late Lee Kuan Yew was misled by her brother, Lee Hsien Loong (LHL) into thinking that his 38 Oxley Road property had been gazetted by the Singapore government, causing him to change his will to bestow the house to LHL.

According to Dr Lee, LKY was led by LHL to believe that Oxley Road had been “gazetted” by the government. She wrote, “This was the background to Loong’s insistence that Papa should change his will to give Oxley Road to Loong alone.”

She goes on to refer to an email on 6 Sept 2012, that is said to be written by LKY to his lawyer, Ms Kwa Kim Li of Lee & Lee, saying “Although it has been gazetted as a Heritage house it is still mine as owner.”

LKY is also said to have written in the same email, “But the house is still mine and I can in my will give Ling the right to stay on in the house.”

Dr Lee claimed that LHL eventually persuaded LKY that since Oxley had been “gazetted”, it was futile to keep LKY’s direction to demolish Oxley in his will.

In an earlier post by Mr Lee Hsien Yang in 2018, he said his late father wanted demolition “unwaveringly”, because he did not want his home made into a shrine. “His legacy is Singapore itself and not his old house”.

He added that Mr Lee Kuan Yew was forced to consider options other than demolition, as “(PM Lee) insisted that the gazetting of 38, Oxley Road was ‘inevitable’.”

He cited an e-mail the late Mr Lee sent to his children on Oct 3, 2011, which said: “Loong as PM has indicated that he will declare it a heritage site”.

On the renovation plans submitted to the URA in 2012, Mr Lee Hsien Yang wrote: “Our father reluctantly went along only because he believed the government already intended to thwart his hopes.”

However, according to Dr Lee, LKY began to doubt the truth that Oxley had been “gazetted” in late 2013.

She claims that LKY discussed with Ms Kwa the possibility of a “degazetting” of 38 Oxley Road after he died.

LKY is said to have been concerned that the government would reverse course after his death so as to benefit LHL, who made Ms Kwa recap what was in his Will in force at the time (dated 2 Nov 2012).

In his statutory declaration to a Ministerial Committee formed in 2017, LHL questioned the role Mrs Lee Suet Fern, Mr Lee Hsien Yang’s lawyer wife, played in the preparation of the last will which her husband had interest in. He also asserted that Dr Lee had been suspicious as to whether the change in shares was really LKY’s decision or one that was instigated by Mr Lee Hsien Yang and his wife. Dr Lee has denied such claims by LHL.

Dr Lee notes that contrary to what LHL has alleged about the final will (dated 17 Dec 2013), LKY knew full well the contents of his prior will when he signed it.

According to Dr Lee, LKY had discussions with Ms Kwa to make changes to his 2012 will and parts of the discussions and LKY’s instructions were recorded in several emails between the two.

Dr Lee wrote that her father had come to a view that the government would reverse course on the “gazetting” of 38 Oxley Road after his death benefitting LHL as a result.

“This was what I believe led Pa to decide to revert to reinstate the provision to demolish the house, which had always been his unwavering wish, and also to grant me the right to live in the house as long as I wished.” wrote Dr Lee.

Earlier in April this year, Dr Lee wrote about how media reports have continued to repeat LHL’s “false and dishonourable allegations” that her brother, Lee Hsien Yang had somehow swindled their father to get more in his final will. The media reports made were in relation to allegations made by Attorney General’s Chamber against LHY’s wife to the Law Society.

Back in 2017, the two siblings, Mr Lee Hsien Yang and Dr Lee had accused their brother of abusing his position on their dispute over the demolition of the old property at 38 Oxley Road which led to the Prime Minister to convene a debate in Parliament where he self-declared himself as being innocent of all the allegations put forth against him. LHL had rejected calls to sue his two siblings for defamation as it would “further besmirch” their parents’ names, and drag out the process for years, creating further “distraction and distress” to Singaporeans.

Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

#SGBudget2019: Reduced travellers’ import tax relief to offset GST increase, more returns for lower and middle income S’poreans

The increase in the Goods and Services Tax (GST) from 7% to 9%…

Indonesian oil and gas tycoon slapped with 112 charges of alleged false trading and market rigging

Indonesian oil and gas magnate Kris Wilaun is facing 112 charges of…

Dr Tan Cheng Bock: “There is fear mongering and gutter politics” being played by PAP

Dr Tan Cheng Bock opined that the People’s Action Party (PAP) is…

裕廊-金文泰市镇会指火患组屋消防栓 上月中旬才检查鉴定正常

日前武吉巴督武吉巴督21街的第210A组屋一单位发生火患,但居民揭发有消防喉无法运作,没来水可救火。 该区组屋由裕廊—金文泰市镇理事会负责。对此,民防部队本月8日向该市镇会发出的“消除火患隐忧通知书”(Fire Hazard Abatement Notice),市镇会有责任维修和保养消防设施,并保证这些设施能正常运作。若被发现重犯,将面对罚款甚至是被起诉。 民防部队在声明中指出,火患现场附近好几个消防栓都被锁头锁住;但即便民防人员当时撬开其中一个消防栓锁头,却发现水管根本喷不出水! 对此,裕廊-金文泰市镇会在今日回应《亚洲新闻台》,澄清有关消防栓刚在上月中旬被检查,被鉴定操作正常。 该市镇会指第210A组屋有64个消防栓,最后一次由承包商检查,是在上月14日。 不过市镇会表示接受民防部队的调查结果,即有关消防喉在火灾当天无法正常运作,“我们将调查原因,并采取适当行动。”不过,该市镇会未回应何以改组屋好几个消防栓被上锁。 民主党秘书长徐顺全也获悉裕廊-金文泰市镇会已回应此事,不过,徐顺全则质疑在火患当天早上,负责消防栓的承包商有被传召到现场,进行检查,惟报告表单则填写消防栓正常,故此要求当局澄清此事。