(Image from Landtransport Guru)

On 1 May (Wednesday), a Facebook user by the name of Ryan Ong Yan Tong‎ made a complaint to SMRT on their Facebook page regarding their refurbishment project in one of their stations.

Apparently, Mr Ryan stated that he wrote in to get an explanation as to why the “the refurbishment of escalator in Lavender (ICA building exit) extended from April 2019 to October 2019 (an extension of 6 months) when the refurbishment project started in January 2019.”

He even attached photos of the project signboard which clearly indicated the original completion date to be April 2019; also specifying later on that the picture on the left was taken on 8 April while the one on the right was taken on 1 May.

He further elaborated that he commutes daily from the Lavender MRT and was “looking forward” to the completion of the refurbishment since January.

“However, to my surprise today, I realized that the completion date is extended to October 2019, which is a delay of 6 months from the original completion date,” he said.

“This means that it is taking the contractor 10 months to refurbish one escalator! I find this level of efficiency appalling and it also proves that there was never an intention to abide to the completion date given the 6 months delay,” he added.

Mr Ryan concluded the post by saying that he hopes to be enlightened about this issue through a response from SMRT.

“What caused the project to be extended by 6 months? Can we be sure that SMRT can keep its promise to complete the project by October now?” he wrote.

SMRT has responded to Mr Ryan’s complaint with a template response while netizens commenting on the post had mixed reactions about the issue.

Jimmy Seah replied to SMRT’s comment, requesting them to share the findings in the comments as “many of us who use lavender mrt station would like to know the reasons too.”

Others backed up his comment stating that this has happened before with other MRT stations whereas some were disbelieving of SMRT’s transparency, such as this comment by David Ho: “I cannot believe why always ask for personal contact to reply. Why can’t the Authorities reply here. These are public info and should be shared.”

On the other hand, there are a handful of Facebook users who were on SMRT’s side as they come up with justifications for the refurbishment problem. Jason W. Derek stated that the reason for the delay is the “need of changing cables, parts and materials. Sometimes there are difficulties which may delay the installation. If you want to finish fast. You make risk your safety.”

Mohammad Zikri was also one of the few in defence of SMRT: “If you think escalator refurbishment is easy, take up the job and go do it. The escalators have been there since the station was built. The projects usually take a long time because there are many checks and balances in place. Also need time to take out the heavy escalator steps. Do so fast and never check, freak escalator accidents are bound to happen.”

Still, Andrew Seah argued this opinion by saying: “Don’t use safety as an excuse. Extension of six months is too long.” Another commenter, Benjamin Ng, laughed about it and said that “all the computer generals” talk about this issue as if it’s easy to fix and that they should “go join smrt and fix la!”

Meanwhile, Patrick Chee feels that this matter of one escalator taking 10 months to fix is “a joke to other countries” and that this news should be kept within Singapore. He also mentioned that this has happened to the escalator at Seletar Mall and probably “many more that we are not aware of”. “Don’t make us a joke to the international community. Especially China can built building in Months.”

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Current President confers Order of Temasek (First Class) to previous President

At the Meritorious Service Medal award ceremony held in Institute of Technical…

CPF Minimum Sum to be increased to $155,000 from July 2014

Ministry of Manpower (MOM) has just announced that the minimum sum that…

11 new cases of COVID-19 infection in S’pore; 9 cases in the community, 5 unlinked

As of Sunday noon (20 Jun), the Ministry of Health (MOH) has…

9月30日后 没回收国旗者将被罚1000元

有在国庆时期悬挂国旗的民众请注意,若还没有回收有关国旗,请尽快行动,否则9月30日后就可能被罚款1000元。 我国每年7月1日至9月30日,都允许民众在建筑物外或没有旗杆的开放空间悬挂或展示国旗。而今年的国旗展示和悬挂期限获得延长,从4月25日开始至9月30日,旨在促进民众于冠状病毒19疫情大流行期间的爱国和团结情操。 但是,若民众所悬挂的国旗无法在9月30日回收,将会面对当局依据《新加坡国徽、国旗和国歌法》所发出的千元罚款。 新加坡文化、社区及青年布(MCCY)曾指出,为了响应民众要求,将会争取法令修改,以延长国旗的时间。 随之而来,《海峡时报》论坛上就有民众来信询问,该部门是否允许国民将国旗全年展示在屋外。来信读者Dhevarajan Devadas指出,只要遵守正确的法则,许多国家和地区的人民可以全年在他们的住家、工作场合和交通工具上展示和悬挂国旗。 他表示注意到在国庆期间,在屋外悬挂过期的人数已经明显减少,因此希望有更多展示国旗的空间,能促进国民爱国精神。 当局指出,要允许长期展示国旗的其中一个考量,就是我们是否能够维护国旗的象征性,包括避免国旗在长时间展示后被磨损或忽视。然而当局补充,有关的限制将会随着时间而转变。 我国曾于2007年修改了悬挂国旗的规则,允许在没有旗杆下,国人能够悬挂或展示国旗,且不需要进行夜间照明,展示期限也从原本的8月国庆月延长了,从7月1日到9月30日。