On 19 March 2019, veteran blogger and human rights campaigner Leong Sze Hian posted the latest update of his infamous libel case with Prime Minister (PM) Lee Hsien Loong on his personal Facebook account, stating that he will appeal the decision to strike off his countersuit of the defamation suit against him.

The statement released by Lim Tean of Carson Law Chambers, the law firm representing Mr Leong reiterated that his client would stand firm by “the argument that the claim brought by the PM is an abuse of process as a defence at trial”.

This came shortly after a statement was sent by the prosecuting team, Davinder Singh Chambers (DSC) to Mr Leong the day before, requesting him to pay a total of S$21,000 for two summonses by 21 March.

To recap, it all began when Mr Leong shared an article published by The Coverage on 7 November 2018 regarding the IMDB corruption scandal and its link to the Singaporean PM. A few days later on 10 November, the Info-communications Media Development Authority (IMDA) ordered Mr Leong to remove the post, which he complied to do so as instructed.

Mr Leong then received a letter from the PM’s lawyer of defamation allegations and a suit was filed against him on 4 December 2018. Mr Leong attempted to countersuit PM Lee for the abuse of process of the Court.

However, the High Court ruled out the counterclaim in favour of PM Lee on the basis that “there is no tort of abuse of process and providing for no exceptions”. Abuse of process is defined as a form of dignitary tort which is closely related to malicious prosecution. Abuse of process can be brought against someone when there is a valid reason for the lawsuit, but the legal system has been misused for ulterior purposes.

Therefore, Mr Leong maintains his stand that the PM’s claim is a tort of abuse of process towards him and his freedom of expression as he did not “assert what the article was alleged to have said was true”. He also emphasised on the fact that there could have been no damage caused by the few readers of his post because the citizens of Singapore are aware that “the Government were asserting that the article was false.“

Lim Tean ends the statement by citing that Mr Leong’s appeal “will challenge the Prime Minister’s case on meaning, extent of publication, on re-publication and on malice.”

Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

TOC Op-ed: Awake, Jim Sleeper

By Choo Zheng Xi/ Consultant Editor Yale lecturer Jim Sleeper’s provocatively titled…

我国每年花费31亿元在压力相关疾病 占医疗总支出18巴仙

研究发现,新加坡每年花费23亿美元(约31亿元)在压力相关疾病,占医疗总支出的18巴仙。 压力相关疾病指任经由压力引起的生理或心理症状,生理症状包含头痛、肌肉疼痛、关节疼痛、肠易激综合症、胃与呼吸灼热;而心理症状则包含焦虑、抑郁和恐慌症。 该报告是由Asia Care Group代表信诺集团(Cigna)执行调查并于昨日(21日)公布。此次调查共调查9个国家包括香港、南韩、台湾、泰国、阿拉伯联合酋长国、英国、美国、澳洲与新加坡。 结果显示,澳洲与我国在压力相关疾病的花费上分别并列第一与第二,之间仅差0.8巴仙。 除了压力相关疾病花费提高,报告显示,从全球范围来看,八成以上的人均承认自己感到压力,而且共64巴仙的人认为他们一直处于焦虑的状态。 长时间工作文化加剧全球压力水平 换言之,人们经常在上下班外感觉到随时在工作,这样的文化加剧了全球的压力水平。 “压力已然成为全球话题,(可是)有时压力却成为人们不喜欢谈论的话题,我们确实需要解决它”,信诺集团首席执行长Julian Mengual表示。 在此前,信诺集团将卫生部和私立医院资料整合,分析医疗保健使用率与压力相关疾病的成本,发现每年竟有逾16万人因压力相关疾病到医院求诊,其每年费用约为9.31亿美元左右。…

Give credit where credit is due, Andy

Did ST’s Andy Ho miss something?

Actor who alleged Gov’t interference in LKY musical removes blog post

About 10 days after the stage play, “Singapura”, abruptly ended its run…