Photo of noose from Shutterstock.com

by Charles Hector, for and on behalf of MADPET(Malaysians Against Death Penalty and Torture)

MADPET(Malaysians Against Death Penalty and Torture) calls on Singapore to stop its plans to execute Malaysian citizen Prabagaran Srivijayan on Friday, 14 July 2017. Prabagaran was convicted and sentenced to death for the offence of drug trafficking by Singapore.  There are concerns that he was not accorded a fair trial.

There is an application now pending at the Malaysian Court of Appeal to refer Singapore to the International Court of Justice (ICJ) for breach of the right to a fair trial. Last March, the Malaysian High Court denied the application for leave for a judicial review to compel Malaysia to intervene by referring Singapore to the ICJ. That means that this judicial review is not even been heard on the merits. Justice demands that Prabagaran not be executed until this court application be heard.

Singapore will not lose anything by simply postponing the execution, better still commuting the death penalty to imprisonment.

As such, for Singapore to execute this Malaysian at this stage, it may be said to be an act of disrespecting not only the Malaysian courts and Malaysia, but also be an affront to justice to execute before the convicted is able fully exercise all available legal options. To now continue with a speedy execution, will also raise the presumption that Singapore may be fearful that the International Court of Justice may indeed confirm that Prabakaran was denied a fair trial.

Whilst Singapore may have amended its laws, making it a possibility that persons convicted for drug trafficking not to be sentenced to death, there are serious flaws in this new current law.

To escape the death penalty, the accussed needs to satisfy 2 conditions – (1) Must get a Certificate Of Substantive Assistance from the Attorney General’s Chambers, and (2) prove on a balance of probabilities, that his involvement in the offence under section 5(1) or 7 was restricted — to transporting, sending or delivering a controlled drug; to offering to transport, send or deliver a controlled drug; to doing or offering to do any act preparatory to or for the purpose of his transporting, sending or delivering a controlled drug; or to any combination of activities above;

Thus, without the Attorney General Chamber’s certificate, the judges in Singapore cannot exercise their discretion when it comes to sentencing, and will have no choice but to sentence the  convicted to death.

It should be only court who determines whether ‘substantive assistance’ was given or not, certainly not the Attorney General’s Chambers. Some persons may not have any other information, and it is unjust conclude since they had not provided ‘substantive assistance’, they will die. Judges will certainly be more independent in determining whether the required or possible ‘substantive assistance’ was given or not – certainly not the Attorney General’s Chambers, who is also the prosecuting authority.

Hopefully, Malaysia will not make a similar mistake when it abolishes the death penalty, and would always ensure that only judges will be vested with the discretion when it comes to sentencing.

To compound matters, the denial of access of lawyers in the Malaysian court actions to Prabagaran is unacceptable and against human rights.(Malay Mail, 7/7/2017)

MADPET calls on Singapore to immediately postpone the planned execution of Prabakaran until he has fully exhausted all his legal options in Malaysia and Singapore, and maybe even the International Court of Justice(ICJ);

MADPET also call for Prabakaran’s death penalty to be commuted;

MADPET calls on Singapore to amend its laws, returning discretion to judges when it comes to sentencing. The provision in law about the requirement of ‘Certificate of Substantive Assistance’ by the Attorney General’s Chambers, before the convicted becomes entitled to a sentence other than death penalty must be repealed.

MADPET also urges the Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak and the Malaysian government to speedily act to save the life of this Malaysian. Malaysia should also withdraw its objections, and allow the judicial review to be heard on its merits by the court.

MADPET also calls on both Singapore and Malaysia to abolish the death penalty, and immediately impose a moratorium on all executions.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Myanmar’s UN envoy wants ‘effective’ anti-junta measures, Council to meet

Myanmar’s ambassador to the United Nations, who has refused to leave his…

Vanished, shot, murdered: Laos activists spooked by spate of incidents

Laotian activists are facing alarming incidents including murder, attempted killing, and disappearances, fueling fears of a governmental crackdown. This wave of incidents has heightened concern within the country’s repressed dissident community. Laos, already recognized as one of the world’s most repressive states, is set to chair ASEAN next year. Critics suggest these incidents could be an effort to stifle dissent ahead of the international spotlight, demonstrating the limits of dissent in this tightly controlled state.

SPF “deliberately mischaracterised” photo taken outside State Courts, mainstream media reports convey erroneous information regarding investigation: Jolovan Wham

Following the reports of mainstream news outlets regarding the Singapore Police Force…

Human rights lawyer M Ravi urges Singaporeans to speak out against Tangaraju Suppiah’s execution

Human rights lawyer M Ravi has called on Singaporeans to speak out against the impending execution of Tangaraju Suppiah, a Singaporean convicted and sentenced to death in 2018 for abetting by conspiracy to traffic 1,017.9g of cannabis. In a Facebook live video, Ravi highlighted several troubling aspects of Tangaraju’s case, including his lack of access to an interpreter and legal counsel during his trial. Ravi also pointed out that Tangaraju did not have access to counsel when his statements were taken, and he suggested that Tangaraju’s case was indicative of broader issues within Singapore’s legal system. Ravi called on Singaporean society to speak out against the execution and argued that it was incumbent on all citizens to stand together to end the practice of the death penalty. He further stressed that the execution would not bring any closure and would be meaningless as the death penalty does not deter drug trafficking. Ravi called on Singaporeans to write to their MPs or the ministers, even the Prime Minister, to stop the execution. Tangaraju’s execution is scheduled to take place on 26 April.