In what is already turning out to be a controversial initiative one day after it was announced, Singapore’s sovereign wealth fund, the Government Investment Corporation of Singapore, or GIC Pte Ltd, is handing out cash grants to students who do volunteer work for 25 hours.
Called “GIC Sparks & Smiles (GIC Sparks)”, the programme “seeks to inspire and enable youths in Singapore to play a positive and active role in their communities”, the company says on its website.
The programme is open to over 500 students across six universities, five polytechnics and the Institute of Technical Education (ITE).
“To receive it, GIC is looking for students who show the desire to serve the community, as well as demonstrate a need for financial support,” the announcement says. “The students who receive the GIC Sparks study grant commit to providing at least 25 hours of community service including mentoring. They will get exposure to range of experiences, skills and opportunities to enable them to volunteer and give their time in a way that makes a difference.”
GIC plans to give S$2,000,000 worth of community service grants to these students over a four-year period – but only students from households with a per capita income of below $2,000 will qualify for the programme.
It is unclear why there is such a cap.
GIC says it “is working closely with its charity partner Beyond Social Services (Beyond) to deliver the programme.”
“Beyond provides the students with mentorship training and connects each of them to a disadvantaged child, youth or family. Acting as facilitators or mentors, the students must build a relationship so they can make a difference through the act of doing. The activities done together can include tutorship, mentoring or facilitating conversations about key issues such as employment or education.”
Reaction to the scheme has been critical.
Ms Leena Kumari, posting online, said, “I personally feel this idea takes away the actual meaning of volunteering. If you expect or receive monetary rewards for it then it’s not volunteering but more of a job.”
Mr Loh Wai Poon questions the rationale of paying for volunteer work.
“A bit of twisted logic,” Mr Loh said. “It may be another form of financial aid. Frankly, volunteerism cannot be boosted by paying volunteers. It is very good to be paid $3K to $5K for 25 hours of community work. This is $120 – $200 per hour! Will it lead to monetarism? Are we sending the wrong message to future volunteers?”
Mr Steve Lim also questioned the scheme.
“Having an allowance for meal and transport is common for volunteer where by at time a token of appreciate is given for some. However when you place a large amount of money for a small amount of duration, it better to put the money to good use instead. For $3000 – $5000, you could have up to 4 full time staff per month, or part time staff at $ 5 to $8 per hour.”
In June last year, the Ministry of Education (MOE)’s introduction of cash incentives as rewards for students who show certain leadership and personal qualities was also criticised. (See here.)
For example, the MOE announced that students “who display good leadership, service to community and school or excellence in non-academic activities are eligible for the Edusave Award for Achievement, Good Leadership and Service.”
These awards are in cash and range from $250 to $500 each.
Some critics say cash incentives should not be used to entice our young students to do better for themselves and the community.
Nonetheless, the GIC’s Director of Human Resources & Organization Development, Deanna Ong, speaking of the GIC scheme, says, “Through the quality interaction between the recipients and community members, we believe both sides will experience the impact of empathy and positive role modelling, which builds confidence for their future.”

Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Singapore Polytechnic Year 2 student tests positive for COVID-19; SP switches to online learning for now

A Year 2 student from the Singapore Polytechnic (SP) School of Media,…

川普点名新加坡是“发展中国家” 贸工部:未利用该地位获优惠

日前,我国遭美国总统川普点名,指包括我国在内的一些富有国家和地区、中国、韩国、卡塔尔及土耳其等,利用“发展中国家”身份享有特殊待遇,并恫言将不承认这些国家的特殊“发展中国家地位”。 川普抨击,在世贸组织成员中,全球10大最富裕的经济体里就有七个——包括新加坡在内——获得“发展中国家”地位。他在推特上发文声称:“当全球最富裕的国家自称发展中国家,以规避世贸组织规则并获取特殊待遇时,世界贸易组织就形同虚设。”   The WTO is BROKEN when the world’s RICHEST countries…

二跨国企业推26周育婴假 网民忧假期过长恐失业

假期对于就业者而言非常重要,尤其是对就业夫妻而言,育婴假更是如此。跨国企业打破目前的局限,将造福我国就业者,推出26周的育婴假。 英国酒业公司帝亚吉欧(Diageo)将从7月1日开始,为“升职”为父母的男女员工们提供26周的育婴假。而目前,该公司在本地共有150名员工,他们所享有的产假和陪产假分别是16周和两周。 据《亚洲新闻台》报导指出,帝亚吉欧的新育婴假政策也将在北美洲、西班牙、泰国和澳大利亚等地区实行。 该公司大中华区和亚太区总裁Sam Fischer指出,推出有关的政策,是为了打造更具包容性和多样化的员工队伍,并且营造更好的就业环境。 彭博推出过渡育婴假 随着帝亚吉欧的宣布,彭博(Bloomberg)近期也将更新其福利政策,推出26周的育婴假。目前,该公司员工,无论男女都享有照顾小孩的18周育婴假。 彭博表示,26周的育婴假分别是让新父母享有24周的有薪假期后,还有10天的“过渡假期”,即允许员工在24周育婴假后,在接下来的10周内,可每周休息一天。 创始人彭博曾于5月15日发出的声明中指出,该公司是意识到每个家庭的不同,因此推出有关政策,以便可以反映出在全球各地男女同事们的需求。 随着有关新政策的推出,该公司的6名本地员工将从中收益。 其他外企维持保守政策 对于以上两家跨国公司的新政策,人力资源公司万宝盛华集团(ManpowerGroup)新加坡区经理Linda…


世界博览会每5年举办一次,各国也纷纷释出设计方案。我国在新加坡城市重建局,以及土地利用规划和保护机构领导下,宣布新加坡馆的设计方案。 根据《CNN》报道此次由新加坡建筑公司WOHA设计,以及Radius experience International建设,在阿拉伯沙漠中创建绿洲,试图打造一个”花园中的城市“,向世界展示新加坡的创新精神,以及作为一个有活力、宜居的自然城市的抱负。 世界顶级设计公司WOHA联合创始人黄文森表示,“我们试图向世界证明在任何一个地方,甚至是在沙漠中,都有可能建立一个自给自足的绿洲。” 参观者将会在地底层进入绿树成荫的世界,将游客带近圆锥体并穿过它们,随后会在经过露天商场平台,除了享受阳光雨棚的遮荫与5-10摄氏度细雾扇的冷却,还可以在此了解关于新加坡的信息,试图打造在炎热的沙漠下,仍然可以保持旅客们的舒适环境。 黄文森指出,新加坡是世界上数一数二的环保城市,因此借由各项技术与绿化的结合,向世界展示新加坡绿化技术与创新。 被问及如何维持室内温度,WOHA表示,该展馆完全依靠太阳能和太阳能海水淡化系统运作,在为期6个月的世博会期间,其能源消耗净值为零。 黄文森补充,他们并希望能够简化所有的工程,透过展馆的展出,可以呈现其可续行,及不会影响其生活品质的技术。