By Singapore Anti-Death Penalty Campaign and We Believe in Second Chances

Singapore Anti-Death Penalty Campaign and We Believe in Second Chances interviewed the sister and cousin of death-row inmate Kho Jabing when they were here in May 2015, after we managed to raise some funds to cover their travel expenses.

Kho Jabing, 31, was convicted and sentenced to death under section 300 (c) of the Penal Code. In the evening of 17 February 2008, Jabing together with four of his friends were at Geylang. According to Jabing’s statement, the intention in heading to Geylang, among the five of them was to commit a robbery in light of the fact that their previous plan to rob two co-workers was aborted.

When they spotted their victims along Lorong 4, Jabing assaulted the deceased with what was described as either a piece of wood or a tree branch, which he had picked up while approaching the victim. Galing, his co-accused, had also assaulted the deceased with a metal belt buckle. Unfortunately, the deceased succumbed to the severe and multiple injuries inflicted by the piece of wood. His three other friends were not involved in this assault, as they had parted with Galing and Jabing before the robbery and assault took place.

The Court of Appeal affirmed Jabing’s conviction on 24th May 2011. The court held that it was beyond reasonable doubt that Jabing intended to, and did inflict multiple head injuries on the deceased.  Jabing was thus sentenced to suffer the mandatory death penalty, which was still in place during his sentence and conviction.

Jabing was afforded an opportunity to be re-sentenced because of the amendments to the death penalty regime in 2013. On 18 November 2013, Justice Tay Yong Kwang re-sentenced Jabing to life imprisonment and 24 strokes of the cane. The prosecutor appealed the re-sentencing decision. On 14th January 2015, the Court of Appeal, by a majority decision (with two out of the five judges dissenting) overturned Justice Tay’s decision and sentenced Jabing to death.

The majority justified imposing the death sentence on the basis that Jabing “exhibited a blatant disregard for human life” due to the “sheer savagery and brutality exhibited by the Respondent (Jabing)” in inflicting the blows to the deceased. The minority judges however, disagreed with the death sentence imposed by the majority. Justice Woo Bih Li and Justice Lee Seiu Kin reasoned that there was a “reasonable doubt (as to) whether Jabing’s blows were all inflicted when the deceased was laying on the ground” which made it “unsafe to conclude beyond reasonable doubt that he (Jabing) acted in away which exhibited a blatant disregard for human life”.

On behalf of Jabing, his lawyers submitted a clemency petition to the President on 24 April 2015. Under the Constitution of Singapore, the President may grant clemency at the advise of the Cabinet, or a minister representing the Cabinet. In other words, the President has no power to grant anyone a clemency unless the Cabinet advises so.

Being the sole breadwinner of his family, his incarceration has led to a loss of income. His mother, who is ill and unable to work, currently lives on the kindness of her neighbours, and little welfare. Her sister is a home maker, whose husband is himself, earning a salary that is just enough to support their small family. As she lives away from her mother, she has little ability to take care of her. We sincerely urge the government to consider this, and grant him mercy.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

WP’s new candidates want to work towards Govt accountability

Ko Siew Huey / The Worker’s Party (WP) introduced its second batch…

We are four

The Online Citizen (TOC) went “live” on the Internet on 1 December…

民主党提“新加坡人优先”人口政策倡议 质疑行动党移民政策

民主党在本周六推介该党的人口政策提案《增强国民:健全政策,保障未来》。有关提案的其中一项献议,是基于积分的才能评估系统,要在新加坡工作的外籍专才,得先提交申请,以对他们的个人资历、技能和经验进行评估。 达到合格积分者将列入候选名单,之后雇主可从该名单中录取外籍雇员。不过前提是,雇主需事先证明没有合适的新加坡人符合有关职缺需求。 值得一提的是,民主党第四个政策提案推介,乃是由该党新人陈雅慧主持。后者相信,上述提案有助于避免雇主因为外籍人士愿意接受较低薪酬,而优先录取他们。 民主党认为,有鉴于新加坡PMET(专业人士、经理、执行人员和技师)群体持续遭到歧视和面对裁员,而提出上述提案。 在今年三月,现任副总理暨财政部长王瑞杰曾表示,新加坡要保持长远永续成长,就应以人口达到一千万的情况作规划。他告知国人应该对外来者保持开放心态。 陈雅慧也对王瑞杰的观点提出质疑,因为我国已是全球人口密度最高的区域之一,若透过吸引外籍人士,把人口增加到一千万,恐怕会令新加坡难以负荷。 至于民主党中委江伟贤也指出,事实上,新加坡几乎是全球最不快乐、劳动者压力最大的国度。罔顾人民的身心健康和幸福,人民行动党一味地把更多外国人塞进这个岛国,结果只会适得其反。 他补充,低生育率和高移民率,也使得本土国人的人口萎缩。而高昂生活成本和生活压力,也是导致国人不得不远走他乡,或是少生孩子的原因。 为了应对眼前这些问题,民主党的人口政策提案提出十大献议,包括确保国人生活成本可负担,让国人能享有更美好的生活。 陈雅慧认为,近年政府一再提高税赋,导致国内生活成本提高,也加剧了人口萎缩的问题。“这就是为何把消费税从7巴仙再调高到9巴仙,绝对是个坏主意。” 民主党也献议基本必需品如食物、药物、学校用品应豁免于消费税。 民主党也指出,人民行动党不惜一切代价,只为了要增加国内生产总值的增长,却误以为引进外籍人士,不成比例地增长人口也可达成目标,这是一大谬误。…

我国暂无意降低投票年龄

日前,新加坡前进党秘书长陈清木呼吁争取让18岁青年拥有投票权,不过我国目前仍不打算降低投票年龄。 贸工部长陈振声代李显龙总理,书面答复三巴旺集选区议员林伟杰医生的国会提问,指出我国是以渐进方式,来决定个人应承担不同职责的不同法定年龄。 “一个人权利和责任随着他心智成熟逐渐增加,一直到他达到普通法制度下21岁的成年年龄。” 降至18岁增13万选民 他说,若把投票年龄降至18岁,将有多达13万青年具备投票资格。 陈振声表示,一个人成年后以成人身份做决定,并从事涉及重大个人责任的活动,如投票决定由谁组织政府、投选依据宪法监督行使监督和否决权的总统,都需要经验和成熟度。 对于有意对国家大事发表意见、希望有所作为的青年,陈振声说政府会继续透过青年活动计划等平台,让青年发表意见,和为国家作贡献。 陈清木认为,18岁青年已经可以开车、上大专、还要参加国民服役,有责任保卫国家,那么他们也有权利选择他们的政府和领袖。他们已经够成熟做出决定。 他说,18岁也是大部分国家的投票年龄。之前有说法指青年对政治不感兴趣。但如果他们成为民主过程的一部分,他们将扮演重要角色。 邻国马来西亚刚在上月18日,在国会得到朝野议员支持通过修宪,让18岁或以上的青年,自动成为选民,可在来届大选可以投票。这也是马国现任希盟政府首次成功修宪。