Khaw in Parliament


Massive breakdown – Govt’s claim of accountability put to the test

Some scenes of the fiasco last night

Some scenes of the fiasco last night

With Tuesday’s massive breakdown of the MRT system, where both the North-South and East-West lines were paralysed for more than 3 hours, it is time for the Government and the SMRT to be held fully accountable for this pathetic state of affairs.

Tuesday’s system failure comes after a year of “major delays” hitting “a record high” in 2014, and more than 5 years of commuters having to endure the unpredictable public train transport system.

Tuesday's shut-down of the train system is the single biggest such incident in the MRT's history, affecting an estimated 250,000 commuters.

TODAY, 19 Dec 2014

TODAY, 19 Dec 2014

And all these despite fares being raised virtually every year, in the name of “better service”.

What is also galling is the massive amount of money being poured into the two public transport operators (PTOs), SMRT and SBS Transit, even as improvements in service standards remain negligible.

This amounts to billions of dollars from taxpayers.

It would thus seem that the more massive the failures, the more money is injected to correct them.

And at the same time, those responsible for these failures are paid an increasing – and yes, massive – remuneration package.

The Online Citizen, 23 June 2015

The Online Citizen, 23 June 2015

Tuesday’s breakdown comes just two weeks after SMRT revealed that it had paid its CEO, Desmond Kuek, S$2.5m – making him its highest-paid CEO ever. (See here.)

When Mr Kuek took on the job in 2012, he was paid S$500,000 for the first six months.

Effectively, on an annualised basis, Mr Kuek saw his salary more than doubled in just three years on the job.

This dwarfed that of his predecessor, Saw Phaik Hwa, who took home $1.85m before she was forced to step down in 2012.

Yet, despite the record number of major breakdowns in 2014, and the more than five years of failing to fix the system, coupled with Tuesday’s incident, no one has been or will likely be brought to account.

All Singaporeans and commuters are offered is another apology, another “I am extremely concerned” from minister Lui Tuck Yew.

That is all the “accountability” Singaporeans will get from the Government, it seems.

Yet, 18 years ago, in July 1997, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong himself, when he was still a minister and being addressed as Brigadier-General (BG), threatened that “civil servants must buck up or lose their jobs.”

"The Civil Service has hardly ever terminated an officer for poor performance," he said then. "I cannot recall any such proposal coming to the Cabinet in my time in Cabinet."

Straits Times, 1997

Straits Times, 1997

Mr Lee’s father, the late Lee Kuan Yew, apparently had no such problem.

In his 1984 National Day Rally speech, the elder Lee said:

"Everything works, whether its water, electricity, gas, telephone, telexes, it just has to work. If it doesn't work, I want to know why, and if I am not satisfied, and I often was not, the chief goes, and I have to find another chief. Firing the chief is very simple."

But by 2008, things were a bit different.

The younger Lee, by then the prime minister of Singapore, said that “forcing ministers to resign was not Singapore’s way”, when rebutting the call for DPM Wong Kan Seng to resign.

Straits Times, 2008

Straits Times, 2008

Mr Wong was the deputy prime minister and Minister of Home Affairs then, and it was during his tenure that Southeast-Asia’s number one terrorist suspect, Mas Selamat, escaped the grasp of Singapore’s authority not once but twice.

“Singapore will not encourage a culture where ministers resign whenever things go wrong on their watch, whether or not they are actually to blame,” the Straits Times reported, citing what Mr Lee had said in Parliament during the debate on the escape of the alleged terrorist.

However, Mr Lee did say that some will still be held accountable for the security lapses.

"We will not just blame the officers directly involved,” he said. “Those with supervisory oversight, or who are responsible for flawed systems, will also be held to account."

But Mr Wong never was held to account and he was fielded as a PAP candidate in the next general election in 2011, and remains an MP for Bishan-Toa Payoh today.

Yet, when it comes to others who are accused of failing, the Government and the PAP sings a whole different tune.

For example, in the ongoing tussle between the Ministry of National Development (MND) and the opposition Workers’ Party (WP) town council, AHPETC, the Government has been engaged in a prolonged – two years so far – attack on AHPETC.

And this after the AHPETC had subjected itself to and cooperated with, a Ministry of Finance-ordered audit by the Auditor General for an entire year where 12 to 18 auditors - including those from PricewaterHouse - camped out in the town council to go through the accounts.

But they did not find anything criminal or funds missing.

Yet, the PAP Government has not stopped but has taken to the courts to prolong the entire fishing expedition even further, wasting needless amounts of taxpayers' money.

Indeed, its minister, Khaw Boon Wan, made a haughty speech in Parliament, waxing lyrical about transparency and accountability, even if this included a bloody imagery of Japanese honour suicide.

Referring to the alleged failures of AHPETC in its accounting methods, Mr Khaw, who is also the chairman of the ruling PAP, told Parliament:

“In Japan, the chairman and CEO would call a press conference, take a deep bow and, in the good old days, they may even commit hara-kiri.”

Khaw in Parliament

Khaw in Parliament

And so we come to Mr Lui and Mr Kuek.

It has been at least 3 years since Mr Kuek took on the job, and many more since the problems with the train system first emerged. Singaporeans and commuters have had to endure one breakdown after another, with no end in sight.

The Government has pumped in billions of taxpayers’ money – including rewarding the PTOs a million dollars just for providing basic dependable service.

Straits Times, April 2014

Straits Times, April 2014

Fares are raised virtually every year.

CEOs’ salaries are doubled, so much so that Mr Kuek now earns more than the country’s prime minister, even when they have not even found the actual problem with the train system.

"In case of major fault, break glass"

"In case of major fault, break glass"

It was only in April this year, after all these years of breakdowns, that the Land Transport Authority (LTA) said it was "looking for experts to assess the health of the entire rail network as the regulator and operators grapple with glitches that do not seem to go away."

Calling them "glitches" is surely an understatement.

And accountability remains elusive.

Singaporeans can expect that nothing will happen – except perhaps more injection of massive amount of money into the PTOs again, and more fare hikes in the months ahead.

Will Mr Lui and/or Mr Kuek do Mr Khaw proud and take to the sword themselves, voluntarily, so to speak?

Or perhaps, as PM Lee once said, it is not in our culture to force such high-flying officials to resign?

That (dis)honour belongs instead only to minions and others, it seems.

But didn't PM Lee himself say in 2008, “Those with supervisory oversight, or who are responsible for flawed systems, will also be held to account"?

Will Mr Lee stick to his words, or was it just another plume of hot air coming out of his mouth?

MRT breakdowns since 2011

MRT breakdowns since 2011

This entry was posted in Commentaries.
This entry was posted in Commentaries.