Mandatory Death Penalty

By Kirsten Han

A workshop session at the first Asian Congress of Death Penalty in Kuala Lumpur agreed on Thursday that the mandatory death penalty could be the low-hanging fruit for the abolitionist movement, and that its removal would be a step towards getting rid of capital punishment.

Professor Chan Wing Cheong, associate professor at the School of Law at the National University of Singapore, said the way the Misuse of Drugs Act and the mandatory death penalty were applied raised many points of concern.

Presumption clauses, for example, make it very difficult for an individual to prove his or her innocence.

“The prosecution can charge a person for trafficking, but they don’t have to prove trafficking. They only have to prove possession,” he said.

The amendments to the death penalty are also very narrow, allowing judges discretion in very specific cases.

Prof Chan Wing Cheong
Prof Chan Wing Cheong

“Even though Singapore has moved slightly in terms of the mandatory sentencing regime, it’s very limited, and there will always be cases that fall beyond the line,” he said, adding that it would be much better to give full discretion to judges.

“Every restriction is a step towards abolition,” said Parvais Jabbar of the Death Penalty Project, which seeks to limit the scope of the death penalty through litigation.

Dr Azmi Sharom, a law professor from the University of Malaya, observed that the mandatory death penalty was not as much of a “political hot potato”, as the Death Penalty Project’s research had found that most Malaysians were not in favour of mandatory capital punishment. It would therefore be easier to first persuade governments to remove the mandatory aspect, before striving to remove capital punishment altogether.

“There is no one step that will work; you’ll have to struggle on many fronts,” said Australian lawyer Julian McMahon, who had represented Andrew Chan and Myuran Sukumaran, who had been executed by firing squad in Indonesia to much controversy.

McMahon urged academics, lawyers and activists to work together to tackle the issue from different angles, and to reach out to the media to educate the public on the death penalty and drug policy, so as to debunk claims about deterrence and the necessity of executions.

Held on the 11 and 12 of June, the Asian Congress of Death Penalty brings together activists, lawyers, parliamentarians and academics to network and discuss pertinent issues related to the abolitionist movements around the world. Organisers say that the event has attracted about 300 participants from 30 countries.

Note: The writer is a founding member of We Believe in Second Chances, a Singapore-based campaign to abolish the death penalty.

Subscribe
Notify of
3 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

首宗中国境外死亡病例! 菲律宾一武汉男确诊病患不治

菲律宾出现首例新型冠状性病毒死亡病例,亦是在中国以外首例死亡病例。 世界卫生组织(WHO)昨日(2日)表示,该名患者为44岁男子,来自武汉,在入境菲律宾前已感染新型冠状性病毒。 与此同时,与这名武汉男性死者一同入境菲律宾的38岁中国女子,是菲律宾首例确诊武汉肺炎病例。  该名女子目前正在医院康复当中。 世卫组织驻菲律宾代表拉宾德拉·阿贝亚辛格(Rabindra Abeyasinghe) 表示,尽管是首宗中国境外的死亡案例,但同时也强调,该名病患并非在菲律宾境内感染,而是接受了外部疫情感染后入境到菲律宾。 当地卫生部指出,该名男子出现咳嗽、发烧、喉咙痛的症状,于1月25日入境政府医院,入院后逐渐严重,尽管在最后几天情况趋向稳定,并出现好转的迹象,但在死前24小时病情恶化,而不幸离世,成为首宗中国境外死亡病例。 菲律宾当局已与中国使馆展开合作,将尽速火化该名病患的遗体。 卫生部长杜克(Francisco Duque III)强调,该名患者与其他中国死亡病例相似,除了肺炎外,仍存在其他健康问题,同时也感染了B型流感与肺炎链球菌。…

泰选委会指公主竞选违宪 法庭27日审吊销泰爱党提案

泰国选举委员会日前针对该党提名乌汶叨公主参选首相一事,向宪法法庭提出吊销泰国爱国党,宪法法庭于2月14日接受相关提案,并于27日开审。 根据《新海峡时报》报导指出,泰选委会于星期三(2月13日)声明称,该党因在上周提名国王胞姐乌汶叻(Ubolratana)竞选总理,违反了选举法,并称此举有违君主立宪制。 经过将近两小时的审议后,宪法法庭的法官宣布同意接受有关的申请,要求该党在收到诉讼书后的一周内,提交答辩书。惟,宪法法庭并没有限制该党参与竞选活动。 爱国党怒斥选委会滥权 爱国党曾向法院提交请愿书,要求拒绝被吊销执照的选委会申请,但是被法院驳回。该党因此怒斥选委会未听取解释,就提呈解散该党的申请,乃滥权、玩忽职守的行为。 泰国将在3月24举行全国大选,泰爱国党于本月8日宣布推举了乌汶叨公主作为代表,竞选首相一职。不过。泰王却在当天晚上发出皇室声明,表示皇室高层不应涉及政治,这有违宪法、颠倒皇室传统,因此公主角逐首相竞选“不恰当”。 虽然公主事后在网上贴文道歉,泰爱国党也表示尊重泰国王的决定,但是泰国选委会表示泰爱国党推举公主的举动显示了对君主立宪制的反对,违反了选举法。

Chinese national jailed 8 weeks for assaulting cabby

Chinese national Feng Jia Cheng, 23, has been sentenced to eight weeks…

遗憾遭他人中伤 陈清木赞许毕丹星善举树立榜样

工人党党魁毕丹星宣布会将反对党领袖津贴中的一半拨出来,用在工人党选区的居民和慈善事业上,获得民众和其他在野党同仁的赞许。 不过,总理夫人总理夫人兼淡马锡首席执行长何晶,则在脸书指出“有好些人一路来默默捐钱未公开予众。”(后来她在脸书澄清,自己并非在批评毕丹星的善举并为此致歉,也欢迎任何好人好事。) 至于前官委议员郑恩里,也批评毕丹星试图把他的捐款政治化。 前进党秘书长陈清木医生,对于毕丹星的举动却遭致他人中伤,感到遗憾。 “不管朝野政党,人们始终公开又或者私下捐出善款。与其试图拿些政治分数,倒不如豁达去接受和欢迎这类善举,岂不美哉。” 陈清木也强调,当前艰难时期,倒不如为他人着想,尽自己所能提供协助。 他也认为,毕丹星的举动也为国人树立了榜样。