Atty Joyce Domingo
Atty. Joyce Domingo Dapat of the Domingo, Munsayac, and Associates Law Offices

By TR Emeritus

A Filipino site, ManilaSpeak.com, recently interviewed their “foreign law expert”, Attorney Joyce Domingo Dapat, with regard to the arrest of Edz Ello in Singapore [Link].

ManilaSpeak is said to be “an aggregator of great minds” [Link]. The site aims to bring together the “most dynamic” Filipino opinion-makers.

“ManilaSpeak was borne out of a desire to give readers intellectual, well-researched opinion. We hope to influence movers and shakers – from leaders of the nation to leaders in lifestyle – in our own humble way,” the site says.

ManilaSpeak wrote, “A Filipino registered nurse, Edz Ello, who is working in Singapore is now facing a unique kind of case. He was arrested due to an alleged Facebook post that maligned Singaporeans. He is now being charged with sedition and lying by the police and was laid off from work by the Tan Tock Seng Hospital.”

In the interview, the Attorney, Ms Dapat, said that what Tan Tock Seng Hospital “did to” Mr Ello may be considered unjust because “there should be a proper charge with evidence related to his work, not merely a comment on Singapore as a whole”.

“If no one saw him type the post, then how can they be sure that his account was indeed not hacked? This is a professional we are talking about. How come his spelling in the post is atrocious? Something does not connect,” she said.

Subsequently, the Singapore police spent some time doing digital forensic analysis of the computing devices Mr Ello used as well as examining server logs (‘FT investigation delay due to ‘digital forensic analysis’‘).

But Ms Dapat rebutted, “They still cannot prove that he was the one who typed the post. Also the tone of the post resembles Singaporean speech and spelling.” Ms Dapat seems to imply that it was a Singaporean behind those posts instead.

The following is the seditious post allegedly made by Mr Ello:

Ms Dapat said that the hospital’s move to lay off Edz Ello is unjust given that nothing has been proven yet.

“I guess they did it because of fear that their reputation will suffer. A similar case occurred when another person posted disparaging remarks against the prime minister. There was no due process, he was similarly just removed from work,” she said.

Ms Dapat felt that it was wrong to impound Mr Ello’s passport.

“This is a violation of the right to travel if the person has not yet been convicted and is not in the black list. This is a basic violation of human rights,” she said.

With regard to the $10,000 bail set for Mr Ello’s case, Ms Dapat said, “The biggest mistake of Mr. Ello was that he lied to the police. But then again, maybe he was scared. He is still young. Imagine you’re in a different country then suddenly somebody is arresting you. Of course, you would be afraid. So the bail was doubled. SGD5,000 for sedition and SGD5,000 for lying.”

Ms Dapat thinks it would be difficult for Singapore to prove sedition.

“Also cybercrime is so hard to prove. Also, all those who saw the post but did not report it may also be called conspirators. What’s important in the proving sedition is proving intent to wreak havoc in Singapore,” she said.

Finally, Ms Dapat seems to think that Filipinos are “diligent” and “speak better English”. She also thinks that Filipino is one of the 4 major races in Singapore.

She said, “According to our kababayans, Singaporeans really look at Filipinos as their competition given that we are diligent and speak better English. You really have to be careful about what you say. Also you have to consider that there are an average of 4 different cultures in that country: Indians, Malaysians, Chinese, and Filipinos. You have to be careful not to offend anyone with your remarks.”

In any case, Ms Dapat might wish to know that Edz Ello has confessed that he made the 3 offending posts. As TTSH said on 9 January 2015:

Capture53-392x480

Subscribe
Notify of
27 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

MOH: Isolation of patients with Zika ceased; Zika testing subsidised for all Singaporeans with symptoms

The Ministry of Health (MOH) stated in the press release yesterday (5…

GE2020 Results: PAP wins Bishan Toa-Payoh GRC with 67.26% of the vote

Bishan Toa-Payoh GRC has been officially called for People’s Action Party (PAP)…

新科电子(培训与虚拟)得内政部合约 监督巡艇建造、测试

本社此前报导,在2017年7月,新加坡内政部招标寻求承包商,为警察海岸卫队(PCG)建造12艘铝制巡逻艇,最终该工程合约在2018年11月26日,正式颁发给新科海事(ST Marine)。 新科海事是新科工程(ST Engineering)的子公司。 不过,根据政府电子商务中心(GeBiz)展示的采购招标资料,内政部刚在今年5月10日,正式把另一合约判给新科工程旗下另一家子公司—新科电子(培训与模拟系统)有限公司。 上述工程合约价值146万新元,让新科电子提供为期五年的海事工程服务,以监督那些交付给本地、中国、拉脱维亚和台湾等地进行的建造巡艇工程,确保巡艇装备和规格符合需求。 根据合约需求,那些在海外建造的巡艇一旦建成,就会运返新加坡安装特定设备,在投入服役前,还要进行检测。新科电子就负责监督建造过程和测试。 从招标简历上看,内政部的招标是在去年9月19日刊登,为期180天,当时共有两家公司竞标,一家是新科电子,另一家则是 G-Master海事服务有限公司,后者开出的服务价码约300万元。毋庸置疑,新科电子以价格优势取得合约。 或许新科电子获得上述招标看起来很合理,不过必须注意的是,他的姐妹公司新科海事,也获得为警察海岸卫队建巡艇的合约。 这意味着,新科电子负责监督和测试的本地建造船只,也可能包括由其姐妹公司建造的12艘巡逻艇。 不过,照正常逻辑来看,理应由不同的单位或机构,来负责监督工程,才能避免利益冲突。 本社也针对此事致函内政部,以寻求当局的回应。…

Stern written warning, fine of $300 or charge in court for anyone in breach of safe distancing measures, starting from 9 April

The people who are found to be in breach of elevated safe…