After an almost two-hour delay in the morning, the trial of 16-year old blogger Amos Yee finally got underway at the State Court on Thursday.

The teenager is being charged on two counts involving his online content which he had published recently.

The first count is for remarks in a Youtube video which the prosecution claims “contained remarks against Christianity, with the deliberate intention of wounding the religious feelings of Christians in general”.

The second charge is one of transmitting an allegedly obscene caricature of Singapore’s late prime minister, Lee Kuan Yew, and the late British prime minister, Margaret Thatcher, on his blog.

A third charge, originally filed against him, was under the Protection from Harassment Act for the video which the prosecution claims “contained remarks about Mr Lee Kuan Yew which was intended to be heard and seen by persons likely to be distressed”.

The prosecution has stood down this third charge for the time being. It could be taken up against Amos Yee again in the future.

The youth was arrested on 30 March and charged the next day.

He is also currently in remand after having rejected the conditions attached to his bail, which include not posting any content online on any subject until his trial is completed.

The prosecution, at the bail review hearing which was held on Wednesday, also introduced a new condition – that Amos Yee went for “psychiatric counselling” if he is let out on bail.

The deputy public prosecutor had also agreed to remove other earlier bail conditions, including the requirement for the teenager to report daily to the Bedok police station.

But Amos Yee refused the conditions altogether, prompting the judge at the review to deny his release from remand.

Members of the public turned up early at court room 7 at the State Court for Thursday’s trial, and the public gallery was packed, with those unable to get in having to wait outside the room.

When Amos Yee was finally brought out in court, a collective gasp was raised from those in the public gallery.

The teenager was handcuffed and shackled in both hands and feet as he made his way to the dock, and he wore a white t-shirt with the word “PRISONER” emblazoned on the back.

“Why shackle him?” some in the gallery said out loud. “Why treat him like that?” they asked. This prompted court officers to order the gallery to be silent.

Amos Yee, who looked to be in good spirits, confirmed that he was pleading not guilty to both charges when asked by the presiding judge, Jasvender Kaur.

He also chose not to give testimony.

The prosecution said it will not be calling any witnesses.

Defence counsel, Alfred Dodwell, told the court that defence will be relying on the statement which Amos Yee had given to the police.

The judge then turned to the evidence submitted by the prosecution, and made particular mention of the obscenity charge.

Apparently referring to the image of Lee and Thatcher, which is the basis of the prosecution’s obscenity charge, the judge said an image by itself was not enough to conclude obscenity. She said there must be intent to profane and corrupt.

She thus instructed the prosecution to address this at Friday’s hearing.

The hearing lasted only a short while as defence counsels asked the court for more time to examine the prosecution’s evidence.

The judge agreed and adjourned the hearing to tomorrow afternoon.

Asked by reporters after the hearing how his client was holding up, Mr Dodwell said, “He’s in the highest spirit possible and he is very happy with the conduct of the case and he feels very confident about it. Amos is very positive. He believes that he’s done nothing wrong, stands by what he says, and this is the very reason why he is in remand, because he refused to be gagged.”

Mr Dodwell, visibly upset, then reminded the media that Amos Yee was a youth and that he should be treated with dignity.

He was apparently referring to news reports which had inaccurately claimed that the teenager had refused psychiatric counselling twice and had refused to attend a third one.

In fact, counsellor Vincent Law has since told The Online Citizen (TOC) that Amos Yee’s third session at the Institute of Mental Health (IMH) had clashed with the day of his bail review hearing.

He thus could not attend the IMH session, even though they had tried to ask the institute to bring the session forward. (See here.)

Mr Law told TOC, “You should know that Amos refused bail today (Wednesday) not because he doesn’t want to continue psychiatric counselling but because he didn’t want to be gagged.”

Indeed, this has been the teenager’s position from the beginning. He believes that he has not done anything wrong, and not been found guilty of any offence, and thus should have the right under the Constitution to free speech.

The bail conditions denied him this right and he thus rejected the conditions.

“For a 16-year old boy to take such a stand, I think… [the] media should reflect him properly,” Mr Dodwell said, “as opposed to try to paint him as some psychopath, needing psychiatric treatment and stuff.”

“He is only 16! Only 16! Please don’t forget that,” Mr Dodwell said. “Don’t make him out to be some kind of demon.”

His remarks were met with cheers and applause from members of the public who were there.

Both of Amos Yee’s parents were also present in court today.

In the meantime, police have told the media that investigations are still ongoing into the assault on Amos Yee which took place on 30 April outside the State Court.

A 49-year old man is reported to have since been arrested by the police for the incident.

Notify of
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like


今日(6月4日)是60年代左派领导者,已故林福寿医生逝世八周年(生于1931年2月21日,逝于2012年6月4日)。他曾在已故建国总理李光耀政府期间,被拘留近20载。 功能八号氏族会今日在脸书专页贴文,悼念林福寿过去为新加坡作出的贡献和牺牲。与此同时,也勿忘那些在1963年2月2日,冷藏行动下的被迫害者。 当时政府号称冷藏行动为最大宗的国家安全行动。多达133人,依“维护公共安全条例”(PPSO)下, 在凌晨时分被逮捕。包括林福寿、工会工作人员、专家、教育工作者以及学生领袖,进行拘留并在未经审判下长时间监禁他们。 然而,在许多新闻报导中,都没有提及任何颠覆性文件或任何武器被扣押。“我们可以肯定地说,被捕者没有任何武器或颠覆性文件。他们甚至没有试图逃脱或抵抗逮捕。政府怎么能认为他们很危险必须被对付?” 社阵中委林福寿,得到来自吉隆坡友人预警有关警方的突袭行动,但他仍留在家里,也未拒捕。傅树介医生等人亦是如此。如果他们真的是颠覆或恐怖份子,难道不早就试图逃之夭夭? 人民行动党声称,被捕者是颠覆性、不忠的新加坡人,这是荒唐可笑的。当时有武器在手的都是辜加兵和参与行动的警察。每个被捕者都动用了10位武装人员。1963年使用的震慑策略,仍沿用至今。 由于政府没有任何针对被捕者的颠覆证据,也没有人受到审判。 在《内安法令》下,决策者完全可以滥用权力。可以无限期拘留林福寿等政治对手,甚至可以拘留一世。 在拘留的第十年,他被开出条件,若接受就能获释,但他拒绝接受李光耀的要求。1972年3月18日,林福寿医生透过妻子陈宗孟医生发出声明,显示他拒绝“给脸”李光耀,林福寿钢铁般的意志,导致他必须面对另外10年监禁的代价。 功能八号氏族会指出,容许《内安法令》存在的危险在于,若缺乏政府更迭和有力的反对党,那么像林福寿那样的拘留者很可能就这么被遗忘、无限期地被关在监狱。难道我们要继续任由政府滥用此恶法? 林福寿去世前一周,他还曾发简讯给光谱行动25周年纪念主办方,…

Hong Kong DBS branch vandalised with graffiti containing vulgarities against PM Lee and PAP, graffiti removed upon discovery

A DBS Bank branch in Hong Kong was vandalised with vulgarities aimed…

Two deaths reported by MOH for 2 May; One from complications due to COVID-19 infection, the other still under investigation

The Ministry of Health (MOH) has confirmed and verified an additional 447…

Lawrence Wong claims to follow WHO's advisory while the PM Lee coins his own phrases

Minister for National Development Lawrence Wong has in a recent press conference…