By Howard Lee
The latest turn in the legal tussle between Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong and blogger Roy Ngerng, on a defamatory post that Ngerng has made against PM Lee, saw Ngerng’s lawyer M Ravi seeking clarification on the validity of PM Lee to claim aggravated damages.
Through a document sent by hand yesterday, Ravi sought clarification from Drew & Napier, PM Lee’s legal representative, on how Ngerng could have caused aggravated damage to PM Lee.
A report published in The Straits Times indicated that Drew & Napier has replied to Ravi with the necessary evidence. However, a number of queries and calls for proof posed by M Ravi did not seem to have been responded to.
For instance, in the amended defence filed on 27 June, Ravi indicated that PM Lee was aggrieved that the offending article, while removed by Ngerng, was “accessed and downloaded by “various people”, whom he does not name and about whom he gives no particulars.”
“Since the Plaintiff claims substantial damages from the Defendant, he is to put proof (i) of whether any identified (or identifiable) person accessed or downloaded the Article on the Blog and (ii) (whether or not the Plaintiff is able to identify any publishee of the Article) of any alleged impact or effect on him as a result of the Article on the Blog being accessed or downloaded.”
Drew & Napier did not provide the proof requested. Instead, in its response dated 25 June, it had reiterated its earlier position that Ngerng “had no intention of abiding by his undertaking (of making the apology)”, and it has always been Ngerng’s “intention to opportunistically use the occasion of the (PM Lee’s) lawful and legitimate demand to raise (Ngerng’s) public profile, garner support and sympathy, and renew his attack against the Plaintiff.”
Drew & Napier also cited another video by Ngerng, which it claimed Ngerng used to assert that “he was “right” to make the allegations of criminal misappropriation against the Plaintiff, that the allegation was “the truth”, that the Plaintiff has used the law to suppress the fact of his criminal misappropriation… and that the Defendant did not “regret” making the allegation against the Plaintiff.”
Ravi further indicated that the subject of the defamation – the trail of City Harvest Church members that received media and public interest – has yet to receive a “guilty” verdict, and readers of Ngerng’s blog “would have known that the City Harvest Church case was ongoing.”
Ravi also indicated that the offending blog post did not just focus on the defamatory matter, but also delved extensively into the CPF system and concerns about its management.
“As would have been clear to readers, principal concerns included the lack of transparency in relation to the manner in which the Singapore Government, MAS, GIC, and/or Temasek managed the funds from CPF monies; the question of interest on the money in the CPF; the growth of GIC and Temasek as wealth fund managers; and the retirement pension position for the citizens of Singapore. Readers would have read the whole of the Article and, accordingly, would have considered the Words and Images Complained of in the context of the whole.”
Ravi also wrote that PM Lee’s statement of claims did not “set out any “reasons” to show why the Plaintiff “has suffered” any loss or damage”as a result of what Ngerng published.
In addition, Ravi also wrote that PM Lee was not able to proof why the initial offer of damage by Ngerng, amounting to $5,000, was “derisory”, and if more was to be expected from Ngerng, PM Lee needs to put to proof “the basis upon which such damages are claimed”.
M Ravi told TOC that he will be making a full submission based on Article 14 of the Constitution, which guarantees a Singaporean’s right to freedom of expression, and will cite Commonwealth papers to show that PM Lee has no cause of action against Ngerng. He added that he will not comment on this matter for now as the case is before court.

Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

【冠状病毒19】陈笃生医院实验室出现人为失误 裕廊西女中学生没确诊

早前一名13岁的裕廊西中学女学生,被误传确诊冠状病毒19,证实时陈笃生医院实验室出现人为失误,把两名病患的拭子检测样本标记错误。 据卫生部和陈笃生医院今日(7月14日)所发出的文告指出,于本月10日公布确诊的13岁裕廊西女学生病例实属失误。该名女学生并没有感染冠毒,也没有出现学校感染,而是医院实验室工作人员将女学生和另一名客工的的拭子检测样本标记错误。 女学生之后再接受两次检测,都出现阴性结果,而目前女学生也已经出院。 确诊客工目前已经入住国家传染病中心,情况稳定。 医院已经针对此事,向两名病患发出通知,并对所造成的困扰和不安表示抱歉。 陈笃生医院实验室已经就此事,对同一期进行的检测展开核查工作,确保没有出现任何失误,并将采取额外措施,避免类似事件重演。

民主党邀民出席 3月16日“减轻生活费用”政策发布会

新加坡民主党将在本月16日(周六),下午2时正,于新加坡民主党总部(宏茂桥3道,第62街,#02-30, Link@AMK工业大厦),举办“减轻生活费用”政策发布会,诚邀民众和支持者出席。 民主党文告表示,为了打造一个具同情心、包容心和持续发展的家园,为了让国人有充足的理由投出神圣的一票,民主党将拟定首个减轻生活费用替代方案,于本周六公布。 民主党指出,新加坡被列为世界上生活费最为昂贵的国家之一,而日益高涨的生活费是所有人民共同关注的课题,但是执政党人民行动党却未能改善,反而视情况加剧。 民主党怒斥在2015年大选期间,行动党总理李显龙,曾向人民承诺会努力解决生活费问题,改善人民生活和负担。“可是行动党却通过提高各种行政收费,增加了民众的痛苦。自上届大选以后,短短三年内他们提高、或者拟议提高了14项行政收费。” 该党也列举诸多已经被调涨,或将可能被提高的各种收费的开销,包括:水费、停车费、车辆进入市区费、市政理事会杂费、电费、煤气费、巴士费、幼儿班学费、大学学费、工艺学院学费、消费税、二氧化碳排放费、数码数字服务费和柴油税。 推出系列方案大选宣言 民主党表示,该党将提出,如何降低人们生活费用的建议,以便减缓新加坡各阶层人民,包括青年、家庭主妇、年老父母、退休人士以及商家在经济上的负担。 除了生活费的替代方案,该党也将陆续推出一系列、针对各课题的替代方案,包括教育、房屋、人口、医疗保健、经济、马来族群和部长薪金等,然后将把各种方案集成一本书,在大选前把详细方案发布给国人审查。 吁民投出有价值的一票 该党相信,此史无前例的举动,能向新加坡国人证明了他们的决心。有关的替代方案也将成为该党的里程碑,更是该党在来解答选的宣言。 民主党希望人民在来届大选中落实选民责任时,不仅仅是抱着反对的心态,而是真正感到手中投出值得的一票。  

Another social media boo boo by PAP MP?

PAP MP for Mountbatten SMC, Lim Biow Chuan, posted the following photo…

牛车水庆中秋灯饰祝福语不伦不类 民众啼笑皆非!

续去年“找吴刚代嫦娥值班”,牛车水庆中秋筹委会今年又一创举:奇葩中秋祝福语令民众啼笑皆非! 据了解,该筹委会灯饰组负责人李玉凤,接受《联合早报》采访时表示,在中国承包商开始制作灯饰前,已经修改过一份祝语清单,要求对方删除“国家欢乐”等不当用语,但对方并未及时纠正过来。 直至挂上去、发现灯饰有问题后,才要求承包商拆下换新的。 本地作曲家潘耀田感叹这些祝福语不伦不类,是否意味着中文水平“无下限的朝着地府方向下降?” 潘耀田在个人脸书贴文提到:“ 又想起我们的“国运”(国家运动)之一的“讲华语运动”, 不禁怀疑:这是否和已故名歌手邓丽君名曲里的句子有点不谋而合异曲同工?“ “邓丽君曾如斯悲痛唱道: “…….. 我没忘记你忘记我,连名字你都說错,证明你一切都是在骗我,看今天你怎么说 ……..你心里根本没有我?把我的华语还给我 ……..…