• About Us
    • Fact Checking Policy
    • Ownership & funding information
    • Volunteer
  • Subscribe
  • Letter submission
    • Submissions Policy
  • Contact Us
The Online Citizen Asia
  • Opinion
    • Editorial
    • Commentaries
    • Letters
    • Comments
  • Current Affairs
    • Singapore
    • Malaysia
    • Indonesia
    • China
    • ASEAN
    • Asia
    • International
  • Finance
    • Economics
    • Labour
    • Property
    • Business
  • Community
    • Arts & Culture
    • Consumer Watch
    • NGO
    • Lifestyle
    • Travel
  • Politics
    • Civil Society
    • Parliament
    • Transport
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Health
    • Housing
  • Law & Order
    • Legislation
    • Court Cases
No Result
View All Result
  • Opinion
    • Editorial
    • Commentaries
    • Letters
    • Comments
  • Current Affairs
    • Singapore
    • Malaysia
    • Indonesia
    • China
    • ASEAN
    • Asia
    • International
  • Finance
    • Economics
    • Labour
    • Property
    • Business
  • Community
    • Arts & Culture
    • Consumer Watch
    • NGO
    • Lifestyle
    • Travel
  • Politics
    • Civil Society
    • Parliament
    • Transport
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Health
    • Housing
  • Law & Order
    • Legislation
    • Court Cases
No Result
View All Result
The Online Citizen Asia
No Result
View All Result

Sub judice and Lynn Lee

by onlinecitizen
16/06/2013
in Current Affairs
Reading Time: 5 mins read
0

By Choo Zheng Xi/ TOC Co-Founder

The “harm” that the law on contempt of Court seeks to prevent is the undermining of public confidence in the fair administration of justice.

The category of contempt of Court  Singaporeans would most likely have read about is an offence known as “scandalizing the Court”.

This was the type of contempt proceedings brought against English journalist Mr Alan Shadrake for statements about the Singapore judiciary in his book on the death penalty, “Once a Jolly Hangman”.

You might also remember a group of activists who were convicted for scandalizing the Court for wearing kangaroo t-shirts at the Supreme Court during a Court hearing of a defamation suit by Mr Lee Kuan Yew against Dr Chee Soon Juan.

Last week, a much less well known type of contempt of Court was used against filmmaker Lynn Lee. The Attorney-General’s Chmabers (AGC) issued a letter against Lynn lee for allegedly committing what is known as “sub judice” contempt of Court.

To the layperson, “sub judice” can loosely be understood as commenting on ongoing cases. “sub judice” means “under judgment” in Latin.

However, if one were to take a more critical look into the nature and history of the law on sub judice contempt, I don’t think the AGC correctly applied it to Lynn.

Also, given the lack of clarity of the law in this area in Singapore, the issuance of an accusation of sub judice contempt by way of warning letter is likely to have the unfortunate effect of making journalists err on the side of self-censorship.

The purpose of sub judice contempt

Let’s start with first principles.

The main purpose of sub judice contempt is to protect the rights of accused persons to a fair trial.

To illustrate, the English case of AG v Sport Newspapers Ltd was about a case of the disappearance of a schoolgirl on her way home from school.

The accused had previous convictions for sexual offences, but these were not put before the Court. “The Sport” newspaper published details of the accused’s previous criminal convictions.

The AG charged the editor of The Sport for contempt on the basis that the publication of the accused’s previous criminal convictions would prejudice his chance to a fair trial of his case: jurors hearing the case might be biased against the accused as a result of the information published.

The principles set down in AG v Sport Newspapers Ltd are important: “In criminal proceedings…the parties, particularly defendants, are entitled to a fair trial by a tribunal whose judgment has not been affected by extraneous pressure or inadmissibile evidence” (emphasis added).

And again, later in the judgment:

“It (the law on sub judice) exists to vindicate and protect the rights of litigants, not the rights of courts or judges save in so far as their task is to vindicate and protect the rights of litigants”. (emphasis added)

Lynn’s video has to been analyzed in this context: what was the likelihood that it could have prejudiced the fair trial of He Jun Ling and Liu Xiang Ying should their trials have gone ahead?

Was there a real risk that a Judge hearing the matter would have been adversely swayed against Liu and He by Lynn’s video?

Sub judice: a Singapore case from the history books

One has to dig deep to find a reported case of sub judice contempt in Singapore.

In 1967, a very interesting complaint alleging sub judice contempt was made against Dr Goh Keng Swee, then the Minister of the Interior and Defence.

The complaint was brought by Lau Swee Soong, a former student of Ngee Ann College.

Lau was arrested for participating in a student demonstration outside City Hall. Lau claimed trial to charges of rioting and was convicted.

Lau brought the sub judice complaint against Dr Goh in relation to statements made by the Ministry of the Interior and Defence about the demonstrations, in which Dr Goh and the Ministry alleged that the students had staged an illegal procession with the intention of staging clashes with the police.

Justice Choor Singh, in holding that Dr Goh was not guilty of sub judice contempt, held that the statements were of a general nature and was said by Dr Goh in the scope of his duty.

Justice Singh then went on to state that he would not exercise the Court’s powers to commit for contempt given the gravity of the punishment: “the jurisdiction (to punish for contempt), being arbitrary and unlimited, should be most jealously and carefully watched, and exercised with the greatest reluctance and the greatest anxiety”.

The above principle should certainly apply in Lynn’s case, as much as it did to Dr Goh Keng Swee.

Sub judice by way of letter: an unfortunate development

Given the purpose of the sub judice rule and its historical roots in Singapore, I doubt if the AGC’s warning to Lynn was the best way to proceed.

The warning letter issued to Lynn was terribly unfair. She now has to live with the stigma of an official “warning” letter stating unequivocally that she is guilty of contempt of Court.

This is despite the fact that the assertion was never tested in a Court of law. It is the view of AGC, which initiated the investigation, decided on her liability, and selected her punishment.

In fact, in light of the purpose and history of sub judice contempt, it is my personal view that it was unlikely that this charge would have succeeded in Court.

More significantly, the warning letter has the potential to negatively impact press freedom in Singapore. Lawyers advising journalist clients on how to proceed on reporting on ongoing cases are now likely to advise their clients to err on the side of caution.

This is unfortunate, given that the AGC’s “out-of-bounds” (OB) markers seems to be drawn more broadly than legal authorities suggest they should.

Separately, several people have also asked me why Prime Minister Lee’s comments on retaining s377A while a constitutional challenge is underfoot do not constitute sub judice contempt. These people point out that the Government’s rationale for retaining s377A is precisely an issue that the Courts currently have to decide on.

I am unable to answer that question, but perhaps greater clarity on the AGC’s policy approach to sub judice contempt would shed some light in this area.

 

Declaration of interest: Choo Zheng Xi was counsel for He Jun Ling and was part of the team that handled the s377A constitutional challenge. He writes this article in his personal capacity. This article is not intended to be relied on as a substitute for legal advice. 

For just US$7.50 a month, sign up as a subscriber on The Online Citizen Asia (and enjoy ads-free experience on our site) to support our mission to transform TOC into an alternative mainstream press.

Related Posts

Malaysian court sentences man to 1,050 years’ jail, 24 strokes of the cane, for raping stepdaughter 105 times
AFP

Thai court jails activist for 28 years jail for royal defamation

26/01/2023
Earning only S$400 a month, delivery-rider turned hawker threw in the towel after two years of running a rojak stall
Community

Earning only S$400 a month, delivery-rider turned hawker threw in the towel after two years of running a rojak stall

26/01/2023
KKH’s lack of continuous monitoring baby’s vital signs “was not ideal”, said State Coroner
Health

KKH’s lack of continuous monitoring baby’s vital signs “was not ideal”, said State Coroner

26/01/2023
Dozens of COVID protesters still behind bars in China: HRW
AFP

Dozens of COVID protesters still behind bars in China: HRW

26/01/2023
8 dead, including 6 Chinese nationals, after ship sinks near Japan
AFP

8 dead, including 6 Chinese nationals, after ship sinks near Japan

26/01/2023
“党籍不会过期失效”  前进党称已就党籍终止知会卡拉
Health

Nurse disabled permanently after vaccine injury and sacked by SGH; Did the hospital advise her to apply for VIFAP?

26/01/2023

Latest posts

Malaysian court sentences man to 1,050 years’ jail, 24 strokes of the cane, for raping stepdaughter 105 times

Thai court jails activist for 28 years jail for royal defamation

26/01/2023
Earning only S$400 a month, delivery-rider turned hawker threw in the towel after two years of running a rojak stall

Earning only S$400 a month, delivery-rider turned hawker threw in the towel after two years of running a rojak stall

26/01/2023
KKH’s lack of continuous monitoring baby’s vital signs “was not ideal”, said State Coroner

KKH’s lack of continuous monitoring baby’s vital signs “was not ideal”, said State Coroner

26/01/2023
Dozens of COVID protesters still behind bars in China: HRW

Dozens of COVID protesters still behind bars in China: HRW

26/01/2023
8 dead, including 6 Chinese nationals, after ship sinks near Japan

8 dead, including 6 Chinese nationals, after ship sinks near Japan

26/01/2023
“党籍不会过期失效”  前进党称已就党籍终止知会卡拉

Nurse disabled permanently after vaccine injury and sacked by SGH; Did the hospital advise her to apply for VIFAP?

26/01/2023
Man and 2-year-old daughter fell into hole in bridge at Sungei Buloh Wetland Reserve, “seconds away from drowning”

Man and 2-year-old daughter fell into hole in bridge at Sungei Buloh Wetland Reserve, “seconds away from drowning”

26/01/2023
Ruling on Trump ban marks defining moment for Facebook panel

Meta says Trump to be allowed back on Facebook, Instagram

26/01/2023

Trending posts

Ho Ching breaks silence over Temasek’s write down of its US$275 million investment in FTX, says it “can afford to be contrarian”

US regulator questions VCs’ due diligence work prior to investing in FTX; Ho Ching says Temasek can afford to be contrarian

by The Online Citizen
24/01/2023
27

...

Two Indian nationals paid about S$330 and S$730 respectively for forged certificates submitted in their S-Pass application

MOM found issuing EPs meant for foreign PMETs to PRC waitress and general worker

by Correspondent
26/01/2023
26

...

Sub judice and Lynn Lee

by onlinecitizen
16/06/2013
0

...

“党籍不会过期失效”  前进党称已就党籍终止知会卡拉

AGC asked to explain purposes of 68 private letters of inmates illegitimately forwarded to prosecutors

by The Online Citizen
21/01/2023
16

...

Indian rupee falls 60% since signing of CECA while Singapore becomes top investor in India

by Correspondent
25/01/2023
34

...

“党籍不会过期失效”  前进党称已就党籍终止知会卡拉

Has HDB flats become “more affordable” by “selling” at a shorter lease of 50-years?

by Leong Szehian
25/01/2023
18

...

June 2013
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
« May   Jul »
  • About Us
  • Subscribe
  • Letter submission
  • Contact Us

© 2006 - 2021 The Online Citizen

No Result
View All Result
  • Opinion
    • Editorial
    • Commentaries
    • Comments
  • Current Affairs
    • Malaysia
    • Indonesia
    • China
    • ASEAN
    • Asia
    • International
  • Finance
    • Economics
    • Labour
    • Property
    • Business
  • Community
    • Civil Society
    • Arts & Culture
    • Consumer Watch
    • NGO
  • Politics
    • Parliament
    • Transport
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Health
    • Housing
  • Law & Order
    • Legislation
    • Court Cases
  • Lifestyle
    • Travel
  • Subscribers login

© 2006 - 2021 The Online Citizen