By Zephyr Mansor –

Letter to the Editor

I would like to share my experience with HDB which I hope you would share with the other TOC readers.

Last night, I found out that 2/3 of my salary was deducted from my bank account through GIRO. After looking at the bank statement, it showed that HDB had deducted that amount. This morning I went to the HDB branch office to seek clarification. I was told that a letter of notification was sent informing me that the said amount would be deducted and if I objected I should send a reply. I told the officer that I did not receive any letter and hence do not give my approval. She said that in the event of no reply, HDB would go ahead and deduct the amount.

I asked if they tried to contact me by any other means since HDB has my mobile, home numbers and email address, her reply is NO. She went on to say that HDB's main office sends the notification letters which the branch office usually don't know anything about until there's an issue like in my case.

I can reverse the deduction by emailing the main office, explaining why I want my money back which I have. I'm told if they agree I have to wait 2 weeks to get my money back.

I find it very disturbing that HDB only sends ONE letter of notification when it wants to deduct a lot of money from your GIRO account. We all know that ONE letter of notification is enough to cover their asses.

I'm a bit behind in my mortgage payments as I was unemployed for about 10 months last year but am now fully employed with enough money to pay HDB the arrears. Which I plan to at my own terms. But to deduct 2/3 of my salary is blatant disregard for my other financial responsibilities which includes child support. Now I will incur late payment charges for all my other expenses while waiting for them to return my money. I have since cancelled my GIRO with HDB. It's an open invitation for them to take your money.

We all know the Gahmen takes money from its citizens everyday, all the time from ERP, COE, GST, etc. But have them put their hands into my bank account is crossing the line.

You May Also Like

Report: Mooting a social assistance scheme search engine

Ideas discussed at a workshop on urban poverty. Cerelia Lim.

Lack of community policing or alcohol, the major contributing cause to Little India Riot?

On Monday (5 June), Yeoh Lam Keong, Former GIC Chief Economist and academic at…

他国被迫“锁国” 陈川仁:一开始未能管控病毒传播

在今日(25日)召开国会前夕,国会议长陈川仁今早在脸书发文,指其他国家被迫转向“封境”措施,是因为未能一开始管控住传播,导致后来病例数增长、医疗体系不堪重负。 “这正是在中国、伊朗、意大利发生的事,接下来会是… …?”他也指当前这些国家只能采取封锁减缓病毒传播,但他担忧可能已错过防堵窗口。陈川仁也指我国还在可控范围,还不到上述国家的地步,因为一开始就已采取措施,例如香港、台湾和韩国也展示他们如何应对疫情。 新加坡在昨日新增49起武汉冠状病毒(COVID-19)确诊病例,本地累计确诊558例。与此同时我国也宣布落实更严厉措施,包括乐龄活动停办、娱乐场所停止运营等。 有不少民众质问,为何当初就采取严谨措施?为何政策一改再改?有者甚至质问是否这些措施太严苛? 对此陈川仁认为,打从疫情出现,我国就致力把感染率维持在最低,以便能更好地照顾病患,透过一些列措施来追踪和隔离,致使目前得以把病例数量维持在可控范围,医疗系统不至于超过负荷,医护人员能照顾严重病患。 依据需要进行管制 他认为我国政府是依据需要进行管制。当前较严厉管制措施影响日常生活和经济,但更多是关乎管理风险和减少感染率、协助病患康复。 “至今我们都做得相当不错,但随着有海外国人返国,如今迎来第二波疫情。但我们必须让他们回来,都是我们的国人,即时他们病了也要照顾。” 他指由于其他地区陷入混乱状态,预计未来数周或几个月内还有更多国人回来,也意味着也有病例增加的可能。他认为这就是为何政府宣布了新的举措。 不过,他又直言,其他国家喜剧性地被迫转向封镜措施,是因为已失去控制,“他们没能管控一开始的传播,已传播到社区且病例数指数型增长,随之医疗系统不胜负荷,也致使死亡率攀升。” “这正是在中国、伊朗、意大利发生的事,接下来是….?这些都会发生除非采取紧急的封锁措施(有些还三心两意?)才能减缓病毒传播。我担忧他们已错失窗口。”…

DBS/POSB first in Singapore to provide instant approval for credit cards & DBS cashline via MyInfo

DBS Bank launched a new online application service leveraging the national platform…