By Ghui

There is ongoing debate between Archbishop Nicholas Chia and Function 8 on the retraction of a letter given by Archbishop Chia in support of an anti ISA rally. To muddy the waters, there is also argument on whether or not these letters should have been made public in the first place.

Given that there is a sizable number of Catholics in Singapore and the many questions in relation to Operation Spectrum that still remain unanswered, this whole saga is unsurprisingly generating great public interest.

Each party has its side to the story and Singaporeans have the right to discuss, comment and question. However, what I do not understand is why the Ministry of Home Affairs sees the need to chastise Function 8 for being “disrespectful” to Archbishop Chia?

Surely this is an issue between the Archbishop (or more broadly the Catholic Church) and the activist group. What is the government body’s role in this debacle?  Individual employees of the Ministry of Home Affairs have every freedom to express their opinions in their personal capacity but an official chastisement is certainly unnecessary. Why the government should get involved in what is essentially a private dispute boggles the mind!

Of course, this issue is now one of public concern and the government will no doubt want to be kept apprised of the situation. Be that as it may, is it the government’s role to take sides? This is not some schoolroom fight where the teacher has to step in to tell one party off for being “disrespectful”.

I can understand why the Ministry of Home Affairs would be concerned with events that could upset the religious balance in our city-state but this is hardly one of those! No religious groups are expressing inflammatory remarks nor is any party inciting religious unrest! The only tenuous connection to religion is that one of the parties is an archbishop! This is hardly about religion and raises the question of whether politics have crept into the domain of religion in what is supposed to be a secular system.

To avoid that suspicion, the Ministry of Home Affairs should not get directly involved.

You May Also Like

Magic shows, Ikea and the corporatisation of LGBT politics

By Jolovan Wham Ikea has stuck to its guns. Despite resistance from…

Ngee Ann City cordoned off a floor at Tower A after its first confirmed case of coronavirus

The Management of Ngee Ann City cordoned off a floor in Tower…

64岁男子倒卧在兀兰组屋垃圾斜槽,已证实死亡

在兀兰组屋内6号通道第677座的垃圾斜槽附近发现一具男性尸体。 据《海峡时报》报道,尸体是昨日早晨由清洁工发现,当时他们正准备清理垃圾斜槽,该名男子被发现时已无法动弹,立即报警处理。 警方接获通报后与救护人员立即赶往现场,救护人员到场后也证实男子已无气息,而警方所得知该名男子64岁,目前案件已非自然死亡案件处理,仍在侦办中。 本地网媒Mothership随后向警方求证,表示男子并非倒卧在斜槽内,而是斜槽附近。  

推广恐怖主义而被扣押四年 男子持双重国籍面控

因推广恐怖主义而被扣押了四年的49岁男子,因隐瞒了持有双重国籍的身份,今天被控上庭。 被告Zulfikar bin Mohamed Shariff,自2016年7月在内安法令下被拘留至今。据资料显示,他积极在网上推广有关恐怖主义和恐怖组织伊斯兰国(ISIS),包括劝诫其他穆斯林拒绝世俗、宪政和民主制度的国家,相信应该以暴力纠正而改为伊斯兰国教法。 最少两名国人受影响成为激进分子,其中一人,Muhammad Shamin Bin Mohamed Sidik已在内安法令下被逮捕和拘留。 根据内政部文告指出,被告于2002年和家人旅居澳大利亚,当时就已经持有新加坡和澳洲的双重国籍。他回到我国被逮捕后,受到内政部安全局和移民与关卡局调查时,隐瞒了澳洲国籍,只承认持有新加坡国籍。 被告也承认为了不失去双重国籍的身份,他在2013年更新新加坡护照时,并没有对移民与关卡局坦承持有其他国家的公民权。…