By TR EMERITUS

You know there was this hooha on Ministry of Manpower and their ergonomic chairs right? [Link to story]

In short, they “spent almost $272,000 to buy a total of 472 Herman Miller chairs for its staff.”

One chair costs $575 – sparking public debate whether the chair is too expensive and excessive.

That was last year (under Gan Kim Yong’s time).

In a recent report, audits by Auditor-General’s Office have shown that “the Ministry of Manpower was found to have given inadequate oversight in awarding a tender for the purchase of office chairs”. [Link to story]

The audit report is online. On pg 32, it states that “the tender approving authority accepted the TER which, without showing cost-effectiveness consideration, recommended the award of tender to the highest bid. This raises doubt on the adequacy of scrutiny by the approving authority in the tender award process.”

But guess what? I was checking GeBIZ, the govt website for tendering and awarding of procurement…

And the Ministry of Manpower is not the only one buying such expensive chairs.

The Attorney-General’s Chambers procured 200 chairs at $597 each, totalling $119,400.

It was awarded on 20 March 2012 to Xtra Office Pte Ltd:

Spring Singapore too:

28 chairs at $650 each, total $18,200.

It is awarded on 1 Aug 2012, to Xtra Office Pte Ltd.

Incidentally, Xtra Office Pte Ltd is the same supplier to Ministry of Manpower in 2011.

To do more comparison, I did more digging:

Prices of office chairs at Ministries and Stat Boards      
    Price /unit Qty Total
Spring Singapore Supply of Chairs to SPRING Singapore at Connexis South $650 28 18,200
Subordinate court High Back Chairs- Supply and delivery $350 20 7,000
  Mid Back Ergonomics Chairs- supply and delivery 195 200 39,000
         
Ministry of Home Affairs-Singapore Civil Defence Force Supply and delivery of Chair Executive, Medium Backrest 165 30 4,950
         
National Environment Agency Mid-back Armchair with mesh-back support backrest 210 20 4,200
  Mid-back Armchair with mesh-back support backrest 350 20 7000
         
Public Utilities Board 4120706/3PN/Provision of Office Chairs and Delivery to Environment Building 150 17 2550
         
Ministry of National Development-Ministry Headquarter Supply and Delivery of Office Chairs 170 100 17,000
         
MCYS – Rehabilitation and Protection General Office Chairs (Corporate Service Unit) 350 13 4550
         
Attorney-General’s Chambers Tender For The Supply And Delivery Of Up To 200 Units Of Ergonomic Office Chairs To Attorney-General’s Chambers 597 200 119,400
Attorney-General’s Chambers Office Chairs (Without armrest) – up to 350 units of office chairs as indicated in Annex A 155 350 54,250

Most chairs procured by ministries and stat boards in the past 6 months are priced from $150 to $350.

All these numbers are obtained from www.gebiz.gov.sg. I just compiled them on an excel spreadsheet.

Granted, I have no idea how these office chairs look like or their differing functions/comfort levels.

But should Govt bodies purchase expensive chairs?

TOC thanks TR EMERITUS for allowing us to republish this article. The article was first published here

You May Also Like

遇上马拉松赛事大塞车 新人婚宴延迟两句钟开场

渣打银行新加坡国际马拉松赛于周六开跑,不料却引发大塞车,造成许多民众的不便,更让一对新人婚宴延迟开场。 年度渣打银行新加坡国际马拉松赛于11月30日傍晚6点开跑,12月1日落幕,但由于赛事在周末举行,而且选择在高峰期间封路,另又有三场大型活动正同时进行,造成大塞车,引来网民炮轰。 新人夫妇倍感绝望 其中一对新人夫妇恰好在当日举行婚宴,不料现场大部分嘉宾均受困于赛车中,就连新郎父母也受困其中,导致婚宴延迟至晚间9时才开场。 《联合早报》报道,新浪李健铭(33岁,总监)与太太当晚在滨华大酒店(Marina Mandarin)宴请约350名亲友,婚宴前的鸡尾酒会原定7时开始,但仅有一两成宾客到场。 他向记者透露,不仅仅是宾客迟到,就连摄影师与造型师都因此迟到,而父母原定要在下午3时到场梳化,却因赛车三小时,到场后化妆师已离开,只能让亲戚帮忙。 “那期间真的让人很绝望,我们焦虑万分却又无能为力”。 一直到9时左右,宾客陆续到场,他们也正式开席,当时所有流程只能匆忙进行,一些宾客因为时间太晚只能先行离开,二人的婚宴一直拖到晚间11时45分才结束,而两人接近凌晨1时才有时间果腹。 李健铭表示,为了筹备大喜之日,新娘一直亲力亲为,却不曾想到最后败在塞车上,因此压力大到崩溃落泪。 “她对所计划的都无法顺利进行感到失望,我也只能在旁安慰。” 如今两人心情已平复,而选择将此事公开并非为了道歉或赔偿,但希望主办单位能够在安排上有所改善。…

MP Zainal: $700 a month enough for a Bangla worker to buy land back home

At a roundtable on wages organised by ST on Friday (30 Nov),…

林志蔚投稿《联合早报》 最低工资需足以反映“生活工资”

续上周针对最低薪金制议题,在国会与执政党议员交锋,工人党盛港集选区议员林志蔚也投稿《联合早报》,续阐述对于最低工资和政府渐进式薪资模式的比较。 尽管林志蔚的国会辩论获得广大报导和讨论,惟他也认为,论述中某些较细致复杂的部分却似乎被埋没。他表示,朝野双方都同意有必要向收入最低的工友给予援助,而通过某种形式的最低工资制,来提高工友工资也是做法之一。 “国务资政尚达曼甚至把渐进式薪金模式称为“加强版最低工资制”,可见这两项提议之间并不存在巨大的差距。” 当然,从设计上说,制定最低工资确实有可能造成失业率上升,进而降低经济效率。在我们看来,为了加强社会公正,作出一定的权衡取舍是值得的。更何况,全球各地数百项研究的证据也显示,只要不把最低工资定得太高,最低工资制对就业的影响微乎其微,甚至无法察觉。 而政府渐进式薪金制(PWM)和最低薪金制的差异,在于后者主张定下一个简单划一、适用于经济体系中所有工薪阶层的最低收入水平。“相比之下,渐进式薪金模式则根据不同行业设定不同的最低工资,同时为工资增幅制定额外层级,让工友随着掌握更多技能、赚取更高工资。” 渐进式薪金模式自2012年首次公布,并于2015年起正式推行以来,仅涵盖三个行业领域,覆盖收入处于底层第30个百分位数的受薪工友当中仅20巴仙人口。 但是,若让渐进式薪金模式以更快速步伐覆盖所有行业,正如全国职工总会副秘书长许宝琨所期许,那至少就最低工资的概念而言,这两种制度之间几乎没什么实际区别。 唯一有待厘清的,就只剩下必须决定工资最低的行业应有的最低工资水平。由于所有其他行业的最低工资都不可能低于这个底限,因此工人党在乎的是,这个工资底限水平必须足以反映“生活工资”,意即足以维持基本生活费。 虽然渐进式薪金模式具备让工友提升技能的灵活性和奖励元素,看似有一定的好处和优势,但是林志蔚认为,设计更简单的最低工资制,成效会更显著。最低工资制体现了这项政策的目标:确保努力工作的国人能赚取足够收入来维持生活。 “工人党建议把最低工资定为1300元。我们是根据政府2019年一家四口的家庭平均基本生活必需品开支调查报告得出这个数额。当然,我们没必要固执地紧咬着这个数字不放。就如我在国会上回应其他议员提问时也曾说过,我的建议是成立一个独立的全国理事会来探讨这个问题,决定最低工资水平,并在必要时定期修订这个数额。” 第二,根据不同行业设定不同的最低工资水平,可能会间接鼓励业者抱着侥幸心态钻漏洞,以至于违背了推行这个模式的初衷。打个比方,一些雇主可能刻意篡改行业领域的类别,以便符合资格采用适用于这个特定行业的较低工资底限。随着更多行业推行渐进式薪金模式,这种滥用情况恐怕只会更严重。 第三,为不同的行业设定不同的最低工资水平、工资层级,以及种种条件和标准,只会使行政工作变得非常繁琐复杂。这还会带来额外的交易成本,并为制度注入诸多低效元素。这些额外的低效元素对经济可能造成的负担,比起从一开始就推行最低工资制,恐怕还要更沉重。…

Appoint members of various political parties to EBRC: SDA

The Singapore Democratic Alliance (SDA) has issued a media statement to question…