~ By Howard Lee ~

Team Singapore (photo credit www.teamsingapore.com.sg)
It is barely days to the Olympic and Paralympic Games, and as the eyes of the world look towards the greatest show on Earth, there will invariably be those who will ask the inevitable: How many medals will our athletes take home?

That question would also undoubtedly be on the minds of Singaporeans. But if you think about it, it is a strange question indeed, not least in reflecting how far we have come as an aspiring sporting nation.

With that one silver medal in Beijing 2008, Singapore is now a medal contender at the Olympics, a far cry from the long drought since the days of weightlifting silver blazed by Tan Howe Liang.

Indeed, we have achieved much in our pursuit for Olympic glory. Much can be said about the efforts of both the athletes striving for their best, and the people behind them who made their Olympic dreams possible.

It has not always been that way. It seemed not so long ago when Singapore has lamented the number of foreigners among our sporting pool, who were viewed with a fair degree of suspicion. Were they making use of their sporting abilities to get a pink IC? What have we done instead to cultivate our Singaporean sons and daughters for sporting excellence?

There was a time when the Ministry of Community Development, Youth and Sports was seen as doing nothing more than throwing money away just to get a medal under our belt.

While that story has yet to reach its conclusion, perhaps a sliver of light has shone through. Among the ranks of the current Team Singapore, there are many more Singaporeans, born and bred here. They are young, and a few would be making their Olympic debut.

What is more, it is already clear that the majority of these athletes will not likely win medals. The immediate instinct would be, why still field them? The answer from the Singapore National Olympic Council – because they are our best, and taking part in the Games can only make them better.

For once, the direction (or at least the public relations efforts) of our national sporting bodies, not least the national Sports Councils, have been spot on, and they have to be commended for it.

As a medal contender, Singapore will never make it into the league of the true Olympic nations, but we can still be a formidable sporting nation if we get our policy compass right.

Ours should be a policy of allowing every Singaporean interested in making sports their career choice a chance to turn that dream into reality. Taking part in the Games, even if you do not make the final cut, is an important step, as much as it is a vital signal of support from your country. The current signs are encouraging.

But we still have far to go. For a start, we need to pay a better tribute to our sporting heroes, to demonstrate that they are not forgotten after their Olympic glory. It is heartening to see our ex-Olympians featured in the Straits Times, but we need to take better stock of what they have achieved, beyond mere show-pieces for the next generation of athletes.

In the course of my work the past year, I have had the opportunity to meet former Olympians like Chia Boon Leong, C Kunalan and Ang Peng Siong. They struck me as unassuming people, who thought little of their current status, and did what they did for the love of sport and country. And it is clear that they are not yet near their sporting sunset.

Ang is, of course, a recognised national coach. As for C Kunalan, I have met him at every other sporting event related to the Games I’ve been to, still active flagging of runs, opening school exhibits and leading tours at the sports museum.

How do we keep them in the sporting fraternity in a structured way that is sustainable to them as a livelihood, to tap on both their knowledge and fighting spirit for the benefit of our future athletes? This will be one of the key challenges facing our nation, if we want to signpost the future for our athletes after their competing prime.

And for another, we need to pay greater attention to our Paralympians. If anything, they are the ones hauling the medals home from the Paralympic Games, yet very little media attention has been paid on their achievements.

I’ve had to opportunity to meet some of the people at the Singapore Disability Sports Council, and their dedication is no less than those who work with able-bodied athletes. I’ve also met para-athletes Muhammad Firdaus, Theresa Goh, Yip Pin Xiu and Jovin Tan, all champions in their own right.

In them I see a fighting spirit that simply becomes a part of them, because they are essentially no different from any youngster trying to find their place in the world. What more can we do to give them the recognition they deserve and increase national awareness of their cause? That would be our moral imperative, more than anything else.

Here, I end with my best wishes to Team Singapore – you have achieved much to be where you are today. The final result at the Olympic and Paralympic Games is really the icing on the cake, and you will be no less acknowledged for what you bring home.


You May Also Like

维文致电柬、越外长 外交部:过去虽存在分歧惟重申续维持友好关系

我国总理因“越南侵柬”论引发越南和柬埔寨两国抗议,如今我国外交部发文告回应,新加坡高度珍视与柬、越两国的关系,尽管过去存在分歧,但仍彼此尊重和友谊相待,且我国与这些国家的双边关系在很多领域都有增长,并共同合作以打造团结的东盟。 外交部发言人称,这是总理在“香”会的演说,以及在致哀泰前首相布勒姆的言论之背景,反映了新加坡长期以来的立场,而过去也同样表态过。我国建国总理李光耀也在他的回忆录中阐述此点。 文告提及,在1979年对于柬埔寨的处境,东盟(当时只有五成员国:泰国、新加坡、印尼、马来西亚和菲律宾)在一份联合声明中也阐述了立场,“肯定柬埔寨人民应享有免受外部势力干预或影响、自行决定未来的自主权利。” 外交部重申,绝不会同情红高棉、也绝不愿看到红高棉政权重返柬埔寨。1988年,东盟赞同联合国大会谴责红高棉的决议,确保红高棉不会涉足柬埔寨政坛。新加坡和东盟也热衷为柬人民提供人道主义援助,且在联合国经济及社会理事会支持下,率先召开1980年对柬埔寨人民人道主义援助国际会议。 外交部解释,总理提及那段历史,乃是为了解释当代领导的远见,以协助受苦人民结束痛苦和悲惨战祸,并实现了现在享有的和平和合作。 “他(李总理)还想强调,区域稳定与繁荣以及东盟团结不能被视为理所当然。当前的地缘政治不确定性,使得推动东盟国家保持团结和凝聚力,加强合作变得更加重要。” 外交部称,尽管新、越对于历史存有不同观点,但两国领导都愿意放下成见促进双边和东盟密切伙伴关系。同样,当柬埔寨在国际监督下完成选举、推举新政府后,新加坡也积极与柬埔寨建立良好关系,并在柬准备好后,将该国带入东盟。“对过去的理解,使我们能够充分重视我们现在享有的良好关系。” 外交部指出,我国外交部长维文也各别致电越南越南副总理兼外长范平明,以及柬埔寨副首相兼外长布拉索昆,向他们解释这一点。而他们也同意尽管过去存在严重分歧,不过希望大家都走向合作、对话与友谊的道路。

Singapore, ASEAN must strongly condemn Myanmar

Charges are a flimsy excuse to extend her detention, which expires at the end of this month. Gerald Giam.