The Court of Appeal has reserved judgement in the case of Yong Vui Kong once again after he filed a criminal motion alleging unequal treatment.

Yong’s lawyer Mr M Ravi, submitted in court this morning that his client has been a victim of unfair treatment, as Yong had been charged and convicted of a capital offence, while the prosecution withdrew charges against his boss Chia Choon Leng.

The prosecution had initially filed 26 charges against Chia. Five of the 26 charges were directly related to Yong, stating that Chia had instigated Yong to carry drugs into Singapore. The Attorney-General’s Chambers (AGC) later withdrew all 26 charges.

Chia recieved a discharge not amounting to an acquittal, and is currently held under the Criminal Law (Temporary Provisions) Act. It is likely that he may be released in one to two years’ time. Yong, on the other hand, faces the gallows.

Mr Ravi argued that this differentiated treatment was in breach of Article 12 of the Constitution, which guarantees equality under the law, pointing out that a less culpable offender has been sentenced to death while the mastermind has not been prosecuted at all.

Mr Ravi also submitted that the AGC had exercised their discretion based on irrelevant considerations while ignoring relevant considerations in their decision to proceed with a capital charge against Yong. He stated that the prosecution had not given enough weight to the fact that Yong was young and in a vulnerable position when the crime was committed, while giving undue weight to the fact that Yong did not want to identify Chia in court, although his refusal was due to fear for the safety of his family.

He thus asked that Yong’s conviction be quashed and his case be sent back to the AGC for review in light of the new circumstances.

Mr Ravi also pointed out that in the exercise of the law, one should also keep in mind the intention of Singapore’s policy. He reminded the court that when the Misuse of Drugs Act was first amended to include the mandatory death penalty in 1975, its aim was to target the masterminds of drug syndicates, and not mere couriers. The then Law Minister, Mr Chua Sian Chin, highlighted this in his speech to Parliament:

It (the Mandatory Death Sentence) is not intended to sentence petty morphine and heroin peddlers to death.

However, Chief Justice Chan Sek Keong and Justices of Appeal Andrew Phang and V K Rajah asked if Chia could be charged under Singapore law for his alleged abetting and instigation, pointing to the fact that the act was committed in Johor Bahru, Malaysia.

After hearing from both sides, the court reserved judgement, asking that both the applicant and prosecution file additional written submissions on whether Chia’s alleged offences can or should be tried under Singapore law. The submissions will be filed on Monday.

After the court delivers its verdict on this new appeal, Yong will have another three months to file a new petition for clemency to the President.

This article first appeared in 'We believe in 2nd chances'. TOC thanks that website for allowing us to reproduce it here. Read Yong Vui Kong’s submissions HERE.


Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like


黎巴嫩首都贝鲁特港口,在本月4日下午发生大爆炸事故,造成78人死亡,近4000人受伤。 爆炸威力强大,连远至200公里外的塞浦路斯都能感到震动,当地居民还拍摄到爆炸现场形成蘑菇云。 据了解事缘爆炸现场附近,有储存爆炸品和化学物品的仓库,事发前仓库还发生火警。 黎巴嫩安全总局认为, 爆炸可能是由储存在仓库、2750吨充公得来的高爆炸性物料硝酸铵所引起。 这些物品2014年以来,就一直被扣押在港口,但港口人员多年来却没有做保护措施。  

Tan Wah Piow to AGC: Phey ‘s criminality is more than adequate in law to render 1975 conviction unsafe

Singapore exile and lawyer, Tan Wah Piow has just replied to Attorney-General’s…

New Senior Minister of State Edwin Tong: Overall public trust in PAP Govt remains healthy

In the long interview with Channel News Asia which was published today…

MINDEF: Formal reasons for detention of Terrex ICVs not yet provided

Ministry of Defence (MINDEF) has updated that formal reasons for the detention…